Skip to main content

The Practice of Psychology in Medical Settings: Financially Sustainable Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Psychological services are safe, effective and economical treatments for multitude of medical conditions. For a variety of contractual and procedural reasons though, when psychological services are performed within a medical setting, obtaining payer reimbursement is often problematic. Because of this, many settings make no attempt to seek reimbursement for these services. This is not a sustainable in the long run though, as it leaves the psychology profession with no economic value to the institution. However, an examination of medical business methods reveals a number of financially sustainable models for the practice of psychology.

I’ve got all the money I’ll ever need, if I die by four o’clock.

—Henny Youngman

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that at the time of this writing, the DSM 5 has now been published, but has yet to be implemented by most payers. However, in the United States, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) has now mandated the use of ICD-10 for diagnostic coding for all services beginning in October of 2015. Since the DSM 5 differs markedly from both the ICD-10 and the beta version of ICD-11 on many of the diagnoses that health psychologists are likely to use, it is not clear how relevant the DSM 5 will be to the practice of health psychology. At the time of this writing, it appears that payers may continue to utilize the DSM IV codes until October of 2015, at which time the ICD-10 codes and definitions will be adopted.

  2. 2.

    The reader should be aware that laws, regulations and acceptable business practices are in a constant state of flux, vary regionally, and vary among both payers and policies as well. While we have made every effort to supply correct information, it remains the responsibility of the professional to verify that a billing method is acceptable to both the payer and the institution.

  3. 3.

    Note that this method, while acceptable to a number of payers at the time of this writing, utilizes the DSM-IV format, which is expected to be obsolete in the United States as of October, 2015. The ICD-10, which goes into effect on that date, does not use a multi-axial diagnosis, and at this time it does not have a code for “Diagnosis deferred.” Because of this, it remains to be seen how payers will implement H&B coding under the ICD-10 system, and psychologists would be wise to be proactive in this regard. Coding “no diagnosis” psychologically may be acceptable.

  4. 4.

    The second category of psychologists, under Medicare, “independently practicing psychologists,” may only perform diagnostic and testing services and therefore would be limited to providing services under the two health and behavior assessment codes.

References

  1. Bruns D. The implementation of integrated primary care at Kaiser Permanente: an interview with Dr. Roger Johnson. 1998. http://www.healthpsych.com/practice/ipc/rogerjohnson1.html. Accessed: 7. Apr. 2014.

  2. Datz G, Bruns D. Billing and coding for psychological pain management. In: Deer TR, editor. Comprehensive treatment of chronic pain: medical, interventional, and behavioral approaches. New York: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler R. Integration of care is about money too: the health and behavior codes as an element of a new financial paradigm. Fam Syst Health. June 2008;26(2):207–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barisa MT, American academy of clinical neuropsychology. The business of neuropsychology: a practical guide. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual on mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Beebe M, Dalton JA, Espronceda M. CPT 2009 professional edition (Current procedural terminology, professional ed.). Washington, DC: American Medical Association; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Psychological Association Practice Organization. Health and behavior code reimbursement; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Dorsten B. Psychological considerations in preparing patients for implantation procedures. Pain Med. 2006;7(s1):S47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruns D, Disorbio JM. Assessment of biopsychosocial risk factors for medical treatment: a collaborative approach. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2009 Jun;16(2):127–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American Psychiatric Association. Task force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR (4th ed). Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reid MC, Engles-Horton LL, Weber MB, Kerns RD, Rogers EL, O’Connor PG. Use of opioid medications for chronic noncancer pain syndromes in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Mar;17(3):173–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin EH, Heckbert SR, Rutter CM, et al. Depression and increased mortality in diabetes: unexpected causes of death. Ann Fam Med. 2009 Sep–Oct;7(5):414–21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Katon W, von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, et al. Behavioral and clinical factors associated with depression among individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004 Apr;27(4):914–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaynes BN, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, et al. Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: a cross-sectional analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Mar–Apr;5(2):126–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke K. Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Nov 10;163(20):2433–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2001 Jun;24(6):1069–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Dorsten B, Weisberg JN. Psychosocial co-morbidities in patients with pain. In Pagoto S, editor. Psychological and physical co-morbidity: a behavioral medicine perspective. New York: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 development. 2012. http://www.dsm5.org. Accessed: 27. Oct. 2012.

  19. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Benefit Policy Manual. Chapter 15–Covered Medical and Other Health Services. 2014. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/bp102c15.pdf. Accessed: 7. Apr. 2014.

  20. Disorbio JM, Bruns D, Barolat G. Assessment and treatment of chronic pain: a physician’s guide to a biopsychosocial approach. Pract Pain Manag. 2006 March;6(2):11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merrill CT, Elixhauser A. Procedures in U.S. hospitals, 2003. Rockville: U.S. Department of health and human services, agency for healthcare research and quality; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bruns D, Mueller K, Warren PA. Biopsychosocial law, health care reform, and the control of medical inflation in Colorado. Rehab Psychol. 2012 May;57(2):81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kessler R, Stafford D. Primary care is the defacto mental health system. In: Kessler R, Stafford D, editors. Collaborative medicine case studies: evidence in practice. New York: Springer; 2008: pp. 9–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher EB, Fitzgibbon ML, Glasgow RE, et al. Behavior matters. Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5):e15–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson A, Fan MY, Unutzer J, Katon W. One extra month of depression: the effects of caregiving on depression outcomes in the IMPACT trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 May;23(5):511–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Steffens DC, Snowden M, Fan MY, et al. Cognitive impairment and depression outcomes in the IMPACT study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 May;14(5):401–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hunkeler EM, Katon W, Tang L, et al. Long term outcomes from the IMPACT randomised trial for depressed elderly patients in primary care. BMJ. 2006 Feb 4;332(7536):259–63.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Unutzer J, Powers D, Katon W, Langston C. From establishing an evidence-based practice to implementation in real-world settings: IMPACT as a case study. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;28(4):1079–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruns D, Mueller K, Warren PA. A review of evidence-based biopsychosocial laws governing the treatment of pain and injury. Psychol Injury Law. 2010;3(3):169–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peek CJ. Planning care in the clinical, operational, and financial worlds: clinical, operational, and financial “Collaboration” and what it looks like on the ground. In: Kessler R, Stafford D, editors. Collaborative medicine case studies. New York: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Bruns PsyD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

American Psychological Association (APA) Sample Language for Letters to Private Insurance Carriers Regarding Coverage of Health and Behavior Services

It has been brought to our attention that your company is not currently reimbursing psychologists for services provided under the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) health and behavior assessment and intervention codes. We would like to take this opportunity to enhance your understanding of the new codes and to discuss the value and effectiveness of health and behavior services.

An Overview of the Health and Behavior Assessment and Intervention Codes

The health and behavior codes were developed to provide psychologists and other health care providers with a way to accurately capture services that focus on the biopsychosocial factors affecting physical health problems. Examples of the physical health issues that psychologists might address under the new codes include patient adherence to medical treatment, symptom management, health-promoting behaviors, health-related risk-taking behaviors, and overall adjustment to physical illness. In almost all cases, a physician will already have diagnosed the patient’s physical health problem before a psychologist sees the patient.

The assessment codes apply to services that identify biopsychosocial factors important to the treatment or management of physical health problems. The intervention codes reflect services used to modify biopsychosocial factors affecting a patient’s physiological functioning, health, and well-being. The codes are published in the CPT manual issued by the American Medical Association (AMA) as follows:

96150:

The initial assessment of the patient to determine the biological, psychological, and social factors affecting the patient’s physical health and any treatment problems

96151:

A re-assessment to evaluate the patient’s condition and determine the need for further treatment

96152:

Intervention services provided to an individual to modify the psychological, behavioral, cognitive, and social factors affecting the patient’s physical health and well-being

96153:

Intervention service provided to a group

96154:

Intervention service provided to a family with the patient present

96155:

The intervention service provided to a family without the patient present

As you are likely aware, developing new CPT codes is a stringent process subject to review by various AMA-coding committees. APA worked closely with the AMA on the creation of the health and behavior codes because psychologists are among the leading health care providers whose training prepares them to furnish these types of services. In 2000, assisted by the National Association of Social Workers, APA conducted a survey to determine appropriate values for the codes and made recommendations to the AMA’s Relative Value Update Committee (RUC) concerning values for the new codes. In 2001, the RUC recommended that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) adopt the values forwarded by the RUC.

CMS accepted the RUC’s recommendation and included the codes and their relative values in the 2002 Physician Fee Schedule published in the November 1, 2001 Federal Register (66 FR 55245, 55463, 55499). At that time, CMS designated the codes as “active,” meaning the codes would be reimbursable effective January 1, 2002 so long as Medicare covered them. Subsequently, CMS determined that Medicare would cover the health and behavior codes with the exception of code 96155 (family intervention without the patient present). CMS excluded code 96155 from coverage because Medicare pays only for services provided directly to Medicare beneficiaries.

Psychologists’ Role in Addressing Physical Health Problems Through the Use of Behavioral Assessments and Interventions

According to the AMA’s CPT Changes 2002 manual, the new codes may be utilized by pediatricians, family physicians, internists, psychiatrists, psychologists, advanced practice nurses, clinical social workers, and other health care professionals within their scope of practice who have specialty or subspecialty training in health and behavior assessment/intervention procedures. However, physicians performing these services are directed to use the Evaluation and Management or Preventive Medicine services codes.

In order for a psychologist to provide both health and behavior assessment and intervention services to a Medicare beneficiary, he or she must be a “clinical psychologist” as defined in Medicare.Footnote 4 This means the psychologist has a doctoral degree in psychology and is licensed or certified by the State in which he or she practices to provide diagnostic, assessment, preventive, and therapeutic services directly to individuals.

As noted earlier, the new health and behavior codes are intended to be used with patients who have a physical health, not a mental health, problem. Although more typically recognized for their work involving mental health, psychologists also use their skills and abilities to treat patients suffering from physical health problems. When treating a patient for a mental health diagnosis, a psychologist would use the appropriate psychotherapy code, not one of the health and behavior codes.

We trust this letter explains the purpose for which the health and behavior codes were developed and clarifies that psychologists, along with certain other health care professionals, are authorized to provide services under the codes. We look forward to hearing that your company has decided to provide coverage of health and behavior services by psychologists.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruns, D., Kessler, R., Van Dorsten, B. (2014). The Practice of Psychology in Medical Settings: Financially Sustainable Models. In: Hunter, C., Hunter, C., Kessler, R. (eds) Handbook of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09817-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09817-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09815-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09817-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics