Advertisement

Are Parents Decisive? The Intergenerational Transmission of Social Axioms Under Conditions of Rapid Social Change

Chapter
Part of the International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP)

The chapter reports a study of 149 East German university students and their parents. It addresses six research questions: (1) the structural equivalence of social axioms across generations, (2) their positional stability across generations (i.e., a high parent—child correlation), (3) differences in the average endorsement of social axioms between generations, (4) differences in parent— child correlations for same-gender as opposed to opposite-gender parent—child dyads, (5) the impact of parental similarity on the endorsement of social axioms in intergenerational transmission, and (6) the importance of zeitgeist for intergenerational transmission. The central finding of the reported study is that—under conditions of rapid social change, as found in East Germany after unification—the five social axioms differ largely in the extent to which they are transmitted from one generation to the next. Strongest transmission effects among the five social axioms were found for religiosity. Only for that dimension of social axioms does one find high structural, intergenerational similarity that speaks for a fully equivalent definition of the social axiom dimension across generations, and a high intergenerational correlation. This does not only mean that religiousness is transmitted well in East German families; the same pertains also to areligiousness. A family's views on religion tend to be quite homogeneous across generations.

Keywords

Intergenerational Transmission Social Complexity Parent Decisive Parental Agreement Subjective Appraisal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. W., & Vernon, P. E. (1931). Study of values: A scale for measuring the dominant interests in personality. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1960). Manual for study of values. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  3. Bierbrauer, G., & Klinger, E. W. (2000). Social axioms scale: German version. Trier: ZPID [http:// www.zpid.de/pub/tests/pt_4137en_de.pdf].Google Scholar
  4. Boehnke, K. (1986). Prosoziale Motivation, Selbstkonzept und politische Orientierung: Entwicklungsbedingungen und Veränderungen im Jugendalter. [Prosocial motivation, self-concept, and political orientation: Development and change in adolescence.] Frankfurt, Germany: Lang.Google Scholar
  5. Boehnke, K. (2004). Do our children become as we are? Intergenerational value transmission and societal value change—two unlinked concepts in social research. In F. Hardt (Ed.), Mapping the world: New perspectives in the humanities and social sciences (pp. 99–118). Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
  6. Boehnke, K., Hadjar, A., & Baier, D. (2007). Parent—child value similarity: The role of zeitgeist. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 778–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bottenberg, E. H. (1982). Alltagsphilosophische Konzeptionen von Personen—ein persönlichkeit-spsychologischer Zugang. [Everyday philosophical conceptions of individuals—a personality psychology approach.] Psychologie und Praxis, 26, 78–93.Google Scholar
  8. Bronner, S. J. (2000). The American concept of tradition: Folklore in the discourse of traditional values. Western Folklore, 59(2), 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. S. (1968). Gordon Willard Allport: 1897–1967. The American Journal of Psychology, 81(2), 279–284.Google Scholar
  10. Carlton, D. W., & Weiss, A. (2001). The economics of religion, Jewish survival, and Jewish attitudes toward competition in Torah education. Journal of Legal Studies, 30(1), 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. H., Miller, C. C., & Huber, G. P. (1999). Determinants of executive beliefs: Functional conditioning and social influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 763–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dilthey, W. (1977). Ideas concerning a descriptive and analytic psychology. In R. M. Zaner, & K. L. Heiges (Eds.), Descriptive psychology and historical understanding (pp. 23–120). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  14. Dukes, W. F. (1955). Psychological study of values. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 24–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dusek, J. B., & Flaherty, J. F. (1981). The development of the self-concept during the adolescent Years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46(4-Serial Number 191).Google Scholar
  16. Dutta, M. J., & Basu, A. (2007). Health among men in rural Bengal: Exploring meanings through a culture-centered approach. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 38–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frommaget, M. (1974/75). Approche quantitative de la Weltanschauung. Bulletin de Psychologie, 75(28), 901–916 (in French).Google Scholar
  18. Hagan, J., Rippl, S., Boehnke, K., & Merkens, H. (1999). The interest in evil. Social Science Research, 28, 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho, W.-C. (2000). The political meaning of Hong Kong popular music: A review of sociopolitical relations between Hong Kong and the People's Republic of China since the 1980s. Popular Music, 19, 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holloway, S. D., Kashiwagi, K., Hess, R. D., & Azuma, H. (1986). Causal attributions by Japanese and American mothers about performance in mathematics. International Journal of Psychology, 21, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanofsky, S., & Lieb, R. J. (2007). Control mastery theory and family therapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(3), 316–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirkpatrick, A. (1976). Aging effects and generational differences in social welfare attitude constraint in the mass public. The Western Political Quarterly, 29(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knafo, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Identity status and parent—child value congruence in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laland, K. N., Kumm, J., & Feldman, M. W. (1995). Gene-culture coevolutionary theory: A test case. Current Anthropology, 36, 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lau, R. R., Quadrel, M. J., & Hartman, K. A. (1990). Development and change of young adults' preventive health beliefs and behavior: Influence from parents and peers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 240–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leung, K., Au, A., Huang, X., Kurman, J., Niit, T., & Niit, K. (2007). Social axioms and values: A cross-cultural examination. European Journal of Personality, 21, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2007). Social Axioms Project [http://personal.cityu.edu.hk/~mgkleung/ sa.htm].
  28. Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., Muñoz, C., Hernández, M., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Bierbrauer, G., & Singelis, T. M. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magsino, R. (1986). Human rights, fair treatment, and funding of private schools in Canada. Canadian Journal of Education, 11(3), 245–263.Google Scholar
  30. Merriam-Webster, Incorporated (1993). Webster's third new international dictionary (unabridged authorized reprint). Köln: Könemann.Google Scholar
  31. Mosley-Howard, G. S., & Evans, C. B. (2000). Relationships and contemporary experiences of the African American family: An ethnographic case study. Journal of Black Studies, 30, 428–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moss, N. E., & Abramowitz, S. I. (1982). Beyond deficit-filling and developmental stakes: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on parental heritage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oettingen, G., Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Causality, agency, and control beliefs in East versus West Berlin children: A natural experiment on the role of context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 579–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson, R. A. (2000). A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters, 11, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rundall, T. G., & Wheeler, J. R. C. (1979). The effect of income on the use of preventative care: An evaluation of alternative explanations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 397–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanford, F. (1961). Psychology: The scientific study of man. San Francisco, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  37. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  38. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Snarey, J. R., & Dollahite, D. C. (2001). Varieties of religion—family linkage: A commentary. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 646–651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soenens, B., Elliot, A. J., Goossens, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyten, P., & Duriez, B. (2005). The intergenerational transmission of perfectionism: Parents' psychological control as intervening variable. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 358–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spranger, E. (1928). Types of men: The psychology and ethics of personality. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  42. [Translation of Spranger, E. (1914). Lebensformen. Geisteswissenschaftliche Psychologie und die Ethik der Persönlichkeit. Halle, Germany: Max Niemeyer.]Google Scholar
  43. Stetsenko, A., Little, T. D., Oettingen, G., & Baltes, P. B. (1995). Agency, control and means— ends beliefs in Moscow children: How similar are they to their Western peers? Developmental Psychology, 31, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Titchener, E.B. (1915). A beginner's psychology book. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Wingert, H. D. (1998). The label “gifted”: Parent beliefs, transmission of beliefs and impact on the child. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 59(1-A), 0340.Google Scholar
  46. Wrightsman, L. S. (1964). Measurement of philosophies of human nature. Psychological Reports, 14, 743–751.Google Scholar
  47. Wrightsman, L. S. (1992). Assumptions about human nature (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor of Social Science MethodologyJacobs University BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations