Exploring Ethnic Group and Geographic Differences in Social Axioms in the USA
- 813 Downloads
This study investigates the dimensionality of a recently developed measure of social beliefs—the Social Axioms Survey (SAS) for American respondents. Ethnic group and geographical differences in the endorsement of social beliefs were also assessed with the SAS with samples of college and noncollege students in eight locations in the USA (N = 2,164). Results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the five-factor structure found previously in international samples (Leung & Bond, 2004). Differences among ethnic groups showed that African Americans scored higher on the belief dimension of religiosity than did Asian or Caucasian Americans. Asian Americans were more inclined toward socially cynical beliefs than were other ethnic groups and believed more in fate control than did Caucasian or Hispanic Americans. Differences in social beliefs across locations were limited to religiosity beliefs when only Caucasian American respondents were considered. Implications for comparisons of samples from the USA with other countries are discussed.
A persistent problem in cross-cultural research has been finding ways to describe cultures in ways that allow for comparison among them. The most common cultural comparison uses the individualism—collectivism dimension (IC) (Hofstede, 1980; Triandis, 1995) and self-construal as the individual-level or psychological indicator (Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Singelis, 1994). Among all the dimensions available, none has generated the research that has accrued to the IC dimension (see Oyserman, Coon, & Kemmelmeier, 2002 for a review and critique). In an effort to add to the cultural dimensions available to scholars wishing to compare and understand cultures, an SAS was recently developed (Leung et al., 2002). The dimensions identified in the survey are based on beliefs rather than values or self-construals.
The results of this initial study suggested that five social axioms factors may be universal: Fate Control, Reward for Application, Cynicism, Religiosity, and Social Complexity. The pan-cultural dimensionality was confirmed in a larger, subsequent study (Leung & Bond, 2004). The purpose of the current study was to explore ethnic group and geographical variations in social beliefs with the SAS in a population from the USA. In addition, we sought to assess the dimensionality of the SAS in this population with a large enough sample to ensure the stability of the factor structure obtained.
KeywordsEthnic Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis Cultural Dimension Geographic Difference Social Complexity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baldwin, J & Hopkins, R. (1990). African American and European-American cultural differences as assessed by the worldviews paradigm: An empirical analysis. Western Journal of Black Studies, 14, 38–52.Google Scholar
- Bentler, P. M. (1985–1995). EQS. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
- Boykin, A. W. (1983). The academic performance of Afro-American children. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fraser, C., & Gaskell, G. 1990. The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Furnham, A. (1988). Lay theories. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Grantham, D. (1994). The South in modern America. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Jones, J. M. (1988). Racism in black and white. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism (pp. 117–135). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model of social beliefs in multi-cultura lperspective. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
- Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2008). Psycho-logic and eco-logic: Insights from social axiom dimensions. In F. van de Vijver, D. van Hemert, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Individuals and cultures in multilevel analysis (pp. 197–219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., Muñoz, C., Hernñndez, M., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Bierbrauer, G., & Singelis, T. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Majors, R., & Mancini-Billson, J. (1993). Cool pose: The dilemmas of black manhood in America. New York: Touchstone Books.Google Scholar
- Reed, J. (1972). The enduring South: Subcultural persistence in mass society. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Reed, J. (1983). Southerners: The social psychology of sectionalism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). The universal content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New dimensions of values. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S. C., & Yoon, G. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Slote, W., & De Vos, G. (Eds.) (1998). Confucianism and the family. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
- Wrightsman, L. S. (1992). Assumptions about human nature. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar