This study investigates the dimensionality of a recently developed measure of social beliefs—the Social Axioms Survey (SAS) for American respondents. Ethnic group and geographical differences in the endorsement of social beliefs were also assessed with the SAS with samples of college and noncollege students in eight locations in the USA (N = 2,164). Results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the five-factor structure found previously in international samples (Leung & Bond, 2004). Differences among ethnic groups showed that African Americans scored higher on the belief dimension of religiosity than did Asian or Caucasian Americans. Asian Americans were more inclined toward socially cynical beliefs than were other ethnic groups and believed more in fate control than did Caucasian or Hispanic Americans. Differences in social beliefs across locations were limited to religiosity beliefs when only Caucasian American respondents were considered. Implications for comparisons of samples from the USA with other countries are discussed.
A persistent problem in cross-cultural research has been finding ways to describe cultures in ways that allow for comparison among them. The most common cultural comparison uses the individualism—collectivism dimension (IC) (Hofstede, 1980; Triandis, 1995) and self-construal as the individual-level or psychological indicator (Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Singelis, 1994). Among all the dimensions available, none has generated the research that has accrued to the IC dimension (see Oyserman, Coon, & Kemmelmeier, 2002 for a review and critique). In an effort to add to the cultural dimensions available to scholars wishing to compare and understand cultures, an SAS was recently developed (Leung et al., 2002). The dimensions identified in the survey are based on beliefs rather than values or self-construals.
The results of this initial study suggested that five social axioms factors may be universal: Fate Control, Reward for Application, Cynicism, Religiosity, and Social Complexity. The pan-cultural dimensionality was confirmed in a larger, subsequent study (Leung & Bond, 2004). The purpose of the current study was to explore ethnic group and geographical variations in social beliefs with the SAS in a population from the USA. In addition, we sought to assess the dimensionality of the SAS in this population with a large enough sample to ensure the stability of the factor structure obtained.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baldwin, J & Hopkins, R. (1990). African American and European-American cultural differences as assessed by the worldviews paradigm: An empirical analysis. Western Journal of Black Studies, 14, 38–52.
Bentler, P. M. (1985–1995). EQS. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au. A., Tong, K. K., & Chemonges-Nielson, Z. (2004). Combining social axioms with values in predicting social behaviors. European Journal of Personality, 18, 177–191.
Boykin, A. W. (1983). The academic performance of Afro-American children. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives. New York: Freeman.
Brody, G., & Shaffer, D. (1982). Contributions of parents and peers to children's moral socialization. Developmental Review, 2, 31–75.
Chinese Culture Connection (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fraser, C., & Gaskell, G. 1990. The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. Oxford: Clarendon.
Furnham, A. (1988). Lay theories. London: Pergamon.
Grantham, D. (1994). The South in modern America. New York: HarperCollins.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Jones, J. M. (1988). Racism in black and white. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism (pp. 117–135). New York: Plenum.
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model of social beliefs in multi-cultura lperspective. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2008). Psycho-logic and eco-logic: Insights from social axiom dimensions. In F. van de Vijver, D. van Hemert, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Individuals and cultures in multilevel analysis (pp. 197–219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., Muñoz, C., Hernñndez, M., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Bierbrauer, G., & Singelis, T. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.
Majors, R., & Mancini-Billson, J. (1993). Cool pose: The dilemmas of black manhood in America. New York: Touchstone Books.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–73.
Reed, J. (1972). The enduring South: Subcultural persistence in mass society. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Reed, J. (1983). Southerners: The social psychology of sectionalism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). The universal content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New dimensions of values. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S. C., & Yoon, G. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.
Singelis, T. M., & Brown, W. J. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21, 354–389.
Singelis, T. M., Hubbard, C., Her, P., & An, S. (2003). Convergent validation of the Social Axioms Survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 269–282.
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H.C. Bhawuk, D., & Gelfand, M. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275.
Slote, W., & De Vos, G. (Eds.) (1998). Confucianism and the family. New York: State University of New York Press.
Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482–497.
Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Vandello, J., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 279–292.
Wrightsman, L. S. (1992). Assumptions about human nature. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singelis, T.M. et al. (2009). Exploring Ethnic Group and Geographic Differences in Social Axioms in the USA. In: Leung, K., Bond, M.H. (eds) Psychological Aspects of Social Axioms. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09810-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09810-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09809-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09810-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)