Leung and Bond (2008) argue that most people are purposeful in life, frequently grappling with two fundamental questions: what goals to pursue in life and how to pursue those goals. The “what” question has been extensively researched under the rubric of values, a long-vibrant enterprise which seeks to identify the general goals that guide people's choices and actions (e.g., Rokeach, 1973). Given the prominence of research on values, it is no coincidence that values are also widely used in conceptualizing national culture and its influence on the performance of its citizens (e.g., Kluckhohn & Stodtbeck, 1961). With its breadth of coverage, the now-classic work of Hofstede (1980) on work-related values has leapfrogged other value frameworks as the dominant paradigm in cross-cultural theorizing.
Subsequent to Hofstede's (1980) ground-breaking work, several major projects have continued to search for value-based dimensions of cultural variation. Using values derived from the Chinese cultural heritage, the Chinese Culture Connection (1987) identified a new dimension of national value variation, Confucian work dynamism, or short-term vs. long-term orientation (Hofstede, 1991). Schwartz (1994) has established a more psychologically grounded mapping of cultures with his seven culture-level value domains. Finally, Smith, Dugan, and Trompenaars (1996) identified three major value dimensions. It is instructive to note that Smith and Bond (1998, ch. 3) concluded that converging results have been obtained across these different value surveys.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becker, G. (1996). The meta-analysis of factor analyses: An illustration based on the cumulation of correlation matrices. Psychological Methods, 1, 341–353.
Bond, M. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multi-cultural studies of values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009–1015.
Brockner, J. (2003). Unpacking country effects: On the need to operationalize the psychological determinants of cross-national differences. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 333–367.
Cheung, M. W. L., Leung, K., & Au, K. (2006). Evaluating multilevel models in cross-cultural research: An illustration with social axioms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 522–541.
Chinese Culture Connection (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.
Keller, H. (1997). Evolutional approaches. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 215–255). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, New York.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational basis. N Y: Plenum, New York.
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model for social beliefs in multicultural perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 119–197.
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2008). Psycho-logic and eco-logic: Insights from social axiom dimensions. In F. van de Vijver, D. van Hemert, & Y. P. Poortinga (Eds.), Individuals and cultures in multilevel analysis (pp. 197–219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., Muñoz, C., Hernãndez, M., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Bierbrauer, G., & Singelis, T. M. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J.-P., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171–188.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. B. (1998). Social psychology across cultures (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and managerial values: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231–264.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leung, K., Bond, M.H. (2009). Introduction. In: Leung, K., Bond, M.H. (eds) Psychological Aspects of Social Axioms. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09810-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09810-4_1
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09809-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09810-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)