Advertisement

Introduction

Chapter
Part of the International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP)

Leung and Bond (2008) argue that most people are purposeful in life, frequently grappling with two fundamental questions: what goals to pursue in life and how to pursue those goals. The “what” question has been extensively researched under the rubric of values, a long-vibrant enterprise which seeks to identify the general goals that guide people's choices and actions (e.g., Rokeach, 1973). Given the prominence of research on values, it is no coincidence that values are also widely used in conceptualizing national culture and its influence on the performance of its citizens (e.g., Kluckhohn & Stodtbeck, 1961). With its breadth of coverage, the now-classic work of Hofstede (1980) on work-related values has leapfrogged other value frameworks as the dominant paradigm in cross-cultural theorizing.

Subsequent to Hofstede's (1980) ground-breaking work, several major projects have continued to search for value-based dimensions of cultural variation. Using values derived from the Chinese cultural heritage, the Chinese Culture Connection (1987) identified a new dimension of national value variation, Confucian work dynamism, or short-term vs. long-term orientation (Hofstede, 1991). Schwartz (1994) has established a more psychologically grounded mapping of cultures with his seven culture-level value domains. Finally, Smith, Dugan, and Trompenaars (1996) identified three major value dimensions. It is instructive to note that Smith and Bond (1998, ch. 3) concluded that converging results have been obtained across these different value surveys.

Keywords

General Belief Epistemological Belief Experimental Social Psychology Fate Control Axiom Dimension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. (1996). The meta-analysis of factor analyses: An illustration based on the cumulation of correlation matrices. Psychological Methods, 1, 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bond, M. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multi-cultural studies of values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brockner, J. (2003). Unpacking country effects: On the need to operationalize the psychological determinants of cross-national differences. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 333–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheung, M. W. L., Leung, K., & Au, K. (2006). Evaluating multilevel models in cross-cultural research: An illustration with social axioms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 522–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chinese Culture Connection (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keller, H. (1997). Evolutional approaches. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 215–255). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational basis. N Y: Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model for social beliefs in multicultural perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 119–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (2008). Psycho-logic and eco-logic: Insights from social axiom dimensions. In F. van de Vijver, D. van Hemert, & Y. P. Poortinga (Eds.), Individuals and cultures in multilevel analysis (pp. 197–219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., Muñoz, C., Hernãndez, M., Murakami, F., Yamaguchi, S., Bierbrauer, G., & Singelis, T. M. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J.-P., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. B. (1998). Social psychology across cultures (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and managerial values: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations