Abstract
Nursing work is intertwined with a number of technologies. This paper explores the work practices in a pediatric intensive care unit, and discusses some possible directions for introducing new technologies. Work in intensive care is approached as a set of complex and networked practices that are characterized by dynamism and reflexivity of situated action. We observed how, in the intensive care unit, the emerging issues and complexity of organizational action are anticipated with situational adaptability and self-ordering of action. Although the nurses are capable of adapting to rapidly changing situations, at the same time, the nursing practices are bounded by the situational rationalities, such as the information available on the patient. With new technologies, we see several opportunities for change in time-place arrangements, in coordination and communication practices, and in information sharing practices. The roles and tasks of the various actants may reformulate, and thereby possibly their skills and professional identities as well. All of this will take place when work practices, new technologies, and care processes are negotiated and made irreversible through the actions of the participants.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aanestad, M. 2003. “The Camera as an Actor: Design-in-Use of Telemedicine Infrastructure in Surgery,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (12:1), pp. 1-20.
Anderson, P. 1999. “Complexity Theory and Organization Science,” Organization Science (10:3), pp. 216-232.
Barnes, B. 2001. “Practice as Collective Action,” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, and E. von Savigny (eds.), London: Routledge, pp. 17-27.
Berg, M. 2001. “Implementing Information Systems in Health Care Organizations: Myths and Challenges,” International Journal of Medical Informatics (64:2/3), pp. 143-156.
Bijker, W. E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelite, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Socio-Technical Change, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bowles, K. 1997. “The Barriers and Benefits of Nursing Information Systems,” Computers in Nursing (15:4), pp. 191-196.
Bucknall, T., and Thomas, S. 1997. “Nurses’ Reflections on Problems Associated with Decision Making in Critical Care Setting,” Journal of Advanced Nursing (25:2), pp. 229-237.
Castells, M. 2000. “Toward a Sociology of the Network Society,” Contemporary Sociology (29:5), pp. 693-699.
Ciborra, C. U. 2002. The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of System, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems, London: Routledge.
Cohen, M. 1999. “Commentary on the Organization Science Special Issue on Complexity,” Organization Science (10:3), pp. 373-376.
Desai, A. 2005. “Adaptive Complex Enterprises,” Communications of the ACM (48:5), pp. 33-35.
Doolin, B., and Lowe, A. 2002. “To Reveal Is to Critique: Actor-Network Theory and Critical Information Systems Research,” Journal of Information Technology (17:2), pp. 69-78.
Effken, J. A. 2001. “Informational Basis for Expert Intuition,” Journal of Advanced Nursing (34:2), pp. 246-255.
Haythornthwaite, C. 2006. “Articulating Divides in Distributed Knowledge Practice,” Information, Communication and Society (9:6), pp. 761-780.
Howcroft, D., Mitev, N., and Wilson, M. 2004. “What We May Learn from the Social Shaping of Technology Approach,” In Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, J. Mingers and L. Willcocks (eds.), Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 329-371.
Jacucci, E., Hanseth, O., and Lyytinen, K. 2006. “Introduction: Taking Complexity Seriously in IS Research,” Information Technology & People (19:1), pp. 5-11.
Jones, M., and Karsten, H. 2008. “Review: Giddens’s Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly 32:(1), 127-157 (plus Appendix A, available at http://www.misq.org/archivist/vol/no32/issue1/JonesAppendix.pdf).
Kaghan, W. N., and Bowker, G. C. 2001. “Out of Machine Age? Complexity, Sociotechnical Systems and Actor-Network Theory,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (18:3/4), pp. 253-269.
Kim, R. M., and Kaplan, S. M. 2006. “Interpreting Socio-Technical Co-Evolution: Applying Complex Adaptive Systems to IS Engagement,” Information Technology & People (19:1), pp. 35-54.
Knox, H., Savage, M., and Harvey, P. 2006. “Social Networks and the Study of Relations: Networks as Method, Metaphor and Form,” Economy and Society (35:1), pp. 113-140.
Lamb, R., King, J. L., and Kling, R. 2003. “Informational Environments: Organizational Contexts of Online Information Use,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (54:2), pp. 97-114.
Latour, B. 1991. “Technology Is Society Made Durable,” In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, J. Law (ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 103-131.
Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lauri, S., and Salanterä, S. 1998. “Decision-Making Models in Different Fields of Nursing,” Research in Nursing and Health (21:5), pp. 443-452.
Law, J., and Callon, M. 1995. “Engineering and Sociology in a Military Aircraft Project: A Network Analysis of Technological Change,” In Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology, S. L. Star (ed.), Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 281-301.
Merali, Y. 2004. “Complexity and Information Systems,” In Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, J. Mingers and L. Willcocks (eds.), Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 407-446.
Moser, I., and Law, J. 2006. “Fluids or Flows? Information and Qualculation in Medical Practice,” Information Technology & People (19:1), pp. 55-73.
Orlikowski, W. J. 2002. “Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing,” Organization Science (13:3), pp. 249-273.
Robinson, M. 1992. “Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Cases and Concepts,” In Readings in Groupware and Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Assisting Human-Human Collaboration, R. Baecker (ed.), San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kauffmann, pp. 29-49.
Salanterä, S., Eriksson, E., Junnola, T., Salminen, E. K., and Lauri, S. 2003. “Clinical Judgement and Information Seeking by Nurses and Physicians Working with Cancer Patients,” PsychoOncology (12:3), pp. 280-290.
Schneider, K., and Wagner, I. 1993. “Constructing the ‘Dossier Representatif’: Computer-Based Information Sharing in French Hospitals,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (1:4), pp. 229-254.
Star, S. L., and Ruhleder, K. 1996. “Steps Towards an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Scale Information Spaces,” Information Systems Research (7:1), pp. 111-134.
Thielke, S., Hammond, K., and Helbig, S. 2007. “Copying and Pasting of Examinations Within the Electronic Medical Record,” International Journal of Medical Informatics (76:Supplement 1), pp. S122-S128.
Van Maanen, J. 1988. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vuokko, R., and Karsten, H. 2007. “Working with Technology in Complex Networks of Interaction,” In Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda, T. McMaster, D. Wastell, E. Ferneley and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Boston: Springer, pp. 11-22.
Vuokko, R., Tetri, P., Peltola, J., and Karsten, H. 2007. Hoitajien työkäytänteet lasten tehoosastolla, National Report 13, Turku, Finland: Turku Centre for Computer Science (in Finnish).
Wiener, C., Strauss, A., Fagerhaugh , S., and Suczek, B. 1979. “Trajectories, Biographies and the Evolving Medical Technology Scene: Labor and Delivery and the Intensive Care Nursery,” Sociology of Health and Illness (1:3), pp. 261-283.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vuokko, R., Karsten, H. (2008). Transforming Work Practices in a Complex Environment. In: Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Middleton, C., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Information Technology in the Service Economy: Challenges and Possibilities for the 21st Century. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 267. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09768-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09767-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09768-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)