Skip to main content

DSS-ERAMANIA: Decision Support System for Site-Specific Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites

Abstract

The DSS-ERAMANIA is a decision support system implementing a site-specific Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) procedure and supporting the experts and the decision makers in the assessment of contaminated soils. It was developed according to a Triad approach, where the results provided by a set of measurement endpoints are evaluated and integrated to support the assessment and characterization of ecosystem impairment (i.e. assessment endpoint) caused by the soil contamination. In the Triad approach, the measurement endpoints refer to three Lines Of Evidence (LOE): environmental chemistry, ecotoxicology and ecology, whose integration should pragmatically reduce the uncertainty in the risk estimation. For the DSS, a framework including three subsequent investigation levels (i.e. tiers) was implemented, that enables the completion of the risk assessment once the provided answer is unequivocal as characterized by a relatively small uncertainty, ensuring at the same time an adequate financial investment. The DSS includes two modules: “Comparative Tables” and “Integrated Ecological Risk Indexes”, both based on Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Module 1 (“Comparative Tables”) aims at comparing the different measurement endpoints belonging to each LOE (i.e. bioavailability tools, toxicity tests and ecological observations) to guide the expert/decision maker in the choice of the suitable set of tests to be applied to the case study for each tier of investigation. Module 2 (“Integrated Ecological Risk Indexes”) provides qualitative and quantitative tools allowing the assessment of terrestrial ecosystem impairment (i.e. the impairment occurring on biodiversity and functional diversity of the terrestrial ecosystem) by integrating complementary information obtained by the application of the measurement endpoints selected in the first module. The two modules were implemented in a software application and validated using the Acna di Cengio contaminated site (located in Savona province, Italy). The objectives, functionalities and structure of the DSS-ERAMANIA will be presented and the main outcomes of the DSS application to the case study will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angelini P, Fenoglio S, Isaia M, Jacomini C, Migliorini M, Morisi A. Tecniche di biomonitoraggio del suolo. ISBN 88-7479-003-1. ARPA Piemonte-CEDAP; 2002. p. 106. [In Italian].

    Google Scholar 

  • ANPA (Agenzia Nazionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente). Guida tecnica sui metodi di analisi per il suolo e i siti contaminati – Utilizzo di indicatori biologici ed ecotossicologici. RTI CNT_TES 1/2004; 2004. [In Italian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Aten CF, Gupta SK. On heavy metals in soil; rationalization of extractions by dilute salt solutions, comparison of the extracted concentrations with uptake by ryegrass and lettuce, and the possible influence of pyrophosphate on plant uptake. Sci Total Environ 1996;178(1–3): 45–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berta G, Fusconi A, Trotta A, Scannerini S. Morphogenetic modifications induced by the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus strani E3 on the root system of Allium porrum L.. New Phytol 1990;114: 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton Jr. GA, Chapman PM, Smith EP. Weight-of-evidence approaches for assessing ecosystem impairment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2002;8: 1657–1673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CARACAS. Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe. Final Publication. Vol. 1-Scientific Basis. LQM Press, Nottingham, UK; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesaro P, Volante A, Massa N, Bona E, Lingua G, Berta G. Phytotoxicity Test to be Used in Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Polluted Soils. XVII International Botanical Congress, Vienna, 17–23 July; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PM, McDonald BG, Lawrence GS. Weight of evidence frameworks for sediment quality (and other) assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2002;8: 1489–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLARINET. Proceeding of the CLARINET Workshop on Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites. April 17–19, 2001, Nunspeet, NL; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLARINET. Sustainable Management of Contaminated Land: An Overview. A Report from the Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies; 2002a. p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLARINET. Review of Decision Support Tools for Contaminated Land Management, and Their Use in Europe. A Report from the Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies; 2002b. p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critto A, Torresan S, Semenzin E, Giove S, Mesman M, Schouten AJ, Rutgers M, Marcomini A. Development of a site-specific Ecological Risk Assessment: Part I: A multi-criteria based system for the selection of ecotoxicological tests and ecological observations. Sci Tot Env 2007;379: 16–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dondero F, Jonsson H, Rebelo M, Pesce G, Berti E, Pons G, Viarengo A. Cellular responses to environmental contaminants in amoebic cells of the slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum. Comp Physiol Biochem 2006;143(2): 150–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOFRAME. Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods: ECOFRAM Terrestrial Draft Report; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusconi A, Repetto O, Bona E, Massa N, Gallo C, Dumas-Gaudot E, Berta G. Effects of cadmium on meristem activity and nucleus ploidy in roots of Pisum sativum L. cv Frisson seedlings. Env Exp Bot 2006;58: 253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardi C, Tomaselli M, Parisi V, Petraglia A, Santini C. Soil quality indicators and biodiversity in northern Italian permanent grasslands. Eur J Soil Biol 2002;38: 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorny M, Grum L. Methods in Soil Zoology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker JE, Berta G, Lingua G, Fusconi A, Sgorbati S. Quantification of AMF-induced modifications to root system architecture and longevity. In: Varma A, editor, Mycorrhyzal Manual. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany; 1998. pp. 515–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDEAS. Quarta relazione (da Giugno 2004 a Dicembre 2004) del progetto di ricerca ERA-MANIA. Final report of the ERA-MANIA project. Centre IDEAS. Venice: Ca’ Foscari University; 2004. pp. 144–166. [In Italian].

    Google Scholar 

  • INIA – Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y tecnologia Agraria y alimentaria, Desarrollo de criterios para la caracterizacion de suelos contaminados y para determinar umbrales para la proteccion de los ecosistemas. Madrid, Espana; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2005;1(2): 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingua G, Fusconi A, Berta G. The nucleus of differentiated root plant cells: modifications induced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Eur J Histochem 2001a;45: 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingua G, D'Agostino G, Fusconi A, Berta G. Nuclear changes in pathogen-infected tomato roots. Eur J Histochem 2001b;45: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long ER, Chapman PM. A sediment quality triad: measures of sediment contamination, toxicity and infaunal community composition in Puget Sound Mar Poll Bull 1985;16: 405–415.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NY; 1988. p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD guideline for testing of chemicals n. 207. Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi V. La qualità biologica del suolo. Un metodo basato sui microartropodi. Acta naturalia de L'Ateneo Parmense 2001;37: 97–106. [In Italian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira AG, Quintana SC. From technocratic to participatory decision support systems: Responding to the new governance initiatives. J Geogr Inf Decision Anal 2002;6: 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petruzzelli G, Lubrano L, Giovannini G, Lucchesi S, Cervelli S. Distribution and behaviour of heavy metals in soils following different clean up procedures. In: Arendt F et al., editors, Contaminated Soil. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; 1993. pp. 545–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutgers M, Den Besten P. Approach to legislation in a global context, B. The Netherlands perspective – soils and sediments. In: Thompson KC, Wadhia K. and Loibner AP, editors, Environmental Toxicity Testing. Blackwell Publishing CRC Press, Oxford; 2005. pp. 269–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenzin E, Critto A, Carlon C, Rutgers M, Marcomini A. Development of a site-specific Ecological Risk Assessment: Part II: A multi-criteria based system for the selection of bioavailability assessment tools. Sci Tot Env 2007;379: 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenzin E, Critto A, Rutgers M, Marcomini A. Integration of bioavailability, ecology and ecotoxicology by three lines of evidence into ecological risk indexes for contaminated soil assessment. Sci Tot Env 2008a;389: 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenzin E, Critto A, Rutgers M, Marcomini A. Ecosystem impairment evaluation on biodiversity and functional diversity for contaminated soil assessment. Submitted to Integr Environ Assess Manag 2008b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siller D, Blodgett C, Cziganyik N, Omeroglu G. Factors involved in urban regeneration: remediation and redevelopment of contaminated urban sites – a comparison of France and the Netherlands. In: Proceeding of CABERNET 2005: The International Conference on Managing Urban Land. Compiled by Oliver L, Millar K, Grimski D, Ferber U, Nathanail CP. Land Quality Press, Nottingham; 2004. ISBN 0-9547474-1-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter II GW, Efroymson RA, Sample BE, Jones DS. Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UK-EA. Ecological Risk Assessment: A Public Consultation on a Framework and Methods for Assessing Harm to Ecosystems from Contaminants in Soil; 2003. www.environment-agency.gov.uk.

  • UNICHIM 1651. Determinazione dell’inibizione della germinazione e allungamento radicale in Cucumis sativus L. (Cetriolo), Lepidium sativum L. (Crescione), Sorghum saccharatum Moench (Sorgo) – saggio di tossicità cronica breve; 2003. [In Italian].

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIPMN (Università del Piemonte Orientale). Progetto per la realizzazione di un centro di eccellenza riguardante monitoraggio e bonifica dei siti inquinati. Rapporto finale realizzato nell’ambito delle attvità di ricerca finanziate dal Commissario delegato per la bonifica dell’ACNA di Cengio, Alessandria, Italy; 2004. [In Italian].

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke P. Multicriteria Decision-Aid. Wiley & Sons, Chickester, UK; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • VROM. Soil Policy Letter. Circular BWL/2003 096 250, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Hague, The Netherlands; 2003. Download: international.vrom.nl/docs/internationaal/7178menarev_1.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work and the ERA-MANIA project were funded by the Italian Government Commissary for the rehabilitation of the Bormida Valley and were developed by University of Venice, Ca’ Foscari, Interdepartmental Centre for Sustainable Development (IDEAS) in collaboration with Italian National Environmental Protection Agency (APAT), Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM) and Consortium Venezia Ricerche (CVR).

We specially thank Claudio Carlon, Miranda Mesman and Ton Schouten for their contribution to the ERA-MANIA project. We also thank Prof. Silvio Giove for developing the MCDA procedures of the DSS-ERAMANIA, Stefano Silvoni for the implementation of the software “DSS-ERAMANIA Module 1: Comparative Tables” and Stefania Gottardo for her technical support.

We are grateful to the Steering Committee members (Trudie Crommentujin, Bona Piera Griselli, John Jensen, Giuseppe Marella, Cristina Menta, Nick Pacini, Gianniantonio Petruzzelli, Eugenio Piovano, Milagros Vega and Aldo Viarengo) for the helpful discussions during the testing phase of both Module 1 and 2 developments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Semenzin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Semenzin, E., Critto, A., Rutgers, M., Marcomini, A. (2009). DSS-ERAMANIA: Decision Support System for Site-Specific Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites. In: Marcomini, A., Suter II, G., Critto, A. (eds) Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09722-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics