Advertisement

Adoption of Service Oriented Computing from the IT Professionals’ Perspective: An e-Government Case Study

  • Ilse Baumgartner
  • Peter Green
Part of the IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 274)

Abstract

The case study reported in this paper focuses on the question: what are the critical factors that influence IT professionals’ intention to adopt the Service Oriented Computing (SOC) paradigm? This work reports a case study examining the e-Government initiative in a middle-sized European city. It uses an initial SOC adoption model developed through a proceeding interview-based exploratory study [2]. The current study has two principle aims. The first aim is to “shed some light” on the IT professionals’ acceptance of such complex technological approaches as Service Oriented Computing in the e-Government sector and to report key learning issues emerging from the case study. The second aim of the case study is to bring further credibility to the first study and to validate empirically its assertions. Some of the major findings of the study are the replacement of the complexity variable by the variable of maintainability, and the replacement of the trust and dependency variables (both of interpersonal rather than of technical nature) by the variable of external involvement. The results of the study also suggest the introduction of the “champion” of the approach variable. Theoretical and practical implications that follow are presented and discussed.

Keywords

e-Government technology acceptance acceptance of Service Oriented Computing 

References

  1. [1]
    R.Agarwal, J. Prasad, A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47:3 (2000) 295-308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    I.Baumgartner, P.Green, Service Oriented Computing: what do IT professionals think?, (2007) (currently under review)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    L. Carter, F. Belanger, The Influence of Perceived Characteristics of Innovating on eGovernment Adoption, Electronic Journal of e-Government 2:1 (2003) 11-20Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. D'Ambra, W. Huang, V. Bhalla, An empirical investigation of the adoption of eGovernment by Australian citizens: some unexpected research findings, Journal of Computer Information Systems 3:1 (2002) 15 - 22Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Z. Ebrahim, Z. Irani, E-Government adoption: architecture and barriers, Business Process Management Journal 11:5 (2005) 589-611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. J. Gallivan, Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework, SIGMIS Database Special issue: Adoption, diffusion, and infusion of IT 32: 3 (2001) 51-85Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Gilbert, P. Balestrini, D. Littleboy, Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-Government, The International Journal of Public Sector Management 17:4 (2004) 286-301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. A. Johnson, B. C. Hardgrave and, E. R. Doke, An industry analysis of developer beliefs about object-oriented systems development, SIGMIS Database 30:1 (1999) 47-64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Khalifa, J.M. Verner, Drivers for software development method usage, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47:3 (2000) 360-369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    B. Kitchenham, L. Pickard, S. L. Pfleeger, Case Studies for Method and Tool Evaluation, IEEE Software 12:4 (1995) 52-62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Leigh, R. Atkinson, Breaking Down Bureaucratic Barriers: The Next Phase of Digital Government, Progressive Policy Institute, Technology & New Economy Project (2001)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    F. Li, Implementing E-Government strategy in Scotland: current situation and emerging issues, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organisations 1:2 (2003) 44-65Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M.B. Miles, A.M. Humberman Qualitative Data Anaysis: A sourcebook of new methods, Sages Publications, Newsbury Park (1984)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    G.C. Moore, I.Benbasat, Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation,. Information Systems Research 2:3 (1991) 192-222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    W.J. Orlikowski, D.C. Gash, Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 2:2 (1994) 174-207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    S.C. Palvia, N.L. Chervany, An experimental investigation of factors influencing predicted success in DSS implementation, Information and Management 29:1 (1995) 43-53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S.C. Palvia, N.L. Chervany, Effect of environmental and process variables on DSS implementation success: evidence from an experimental investigation for the moving stage of change, Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track 3 (1989) 812-21Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. K. Riemenschneider, B. C. Hardgrave, and F. D. Davis, Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of Methodologies: A Comparison of Five Theoretical Models, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28:12 (2002) 1135-1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    T.L. Roberts, M.L. Gibson, Jr., K.T. Fields, R.K. Rainer, Jr, Factors that impact implementing a system development methodology, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24:8 (1998) 640-649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    E.M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations (The Free Press, New York, 1995, 4th ed.)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    S. Smith, R. Jamieson, Determining key factors in e-Government information system security, Information Systems Management. Boston 23:2 (2006) 23-33Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    R. Stake, The art of case research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (1995)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    F. Sultan, L. Chan, The adoption of new technology: the case of object-oriented computing in software companies, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47:1 (2000) 106-126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly 27:3 (2003) 425-478Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Warkentin, D. Gefen, P. Pavlou, G. Rose, Encouraging Citizen Adoption of eGovernment by Building Trust, Electronic Markets 12:3 (2002) 157-162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    X. Wei, J. Zhao, Citizens' requirement analysis in Chinese e-Government, Proceedings of the 7th international Conference on Electronic Commerce 113 (2005) 525 - 428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    R. Yin, Case study research: Design and methods, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing 2nd ed. (1994)Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    M.V. Zelkowitz, D.R. Wallace, Experimental Models for Validating Technology, IEEE Computer 31:5 (1998) 23-31Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    2006 Online Availability of Public Services: How is Europe Progressing?, full Capgemini report available on http://www.capgemini.com/resources/thought_leadership/2006_online_availability_of_public_services/ (last access September 6, 2007)
  30. [30]
    Platform  “Digitales Österreich”  (Digital Austria), available on http://reference.e-Government.gv.at/Digitales_OEsterreich.725.0.html (last access September 6, 2007)

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilse Baumgartner
    • 1
  • Peter Green
    • 1
  1. 1.Business SchoolThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAU

Personalised recommendations