Abstract
Imitation is not only a powerful means to drastically downsize the exploration space when learning behavior. It also helps to align the learning efforts of a robot group towards a common goal. However, one prerequisite in imitation, the decision of which robot to imitate, is often factored out in current research.
In our work we address this question by providing a means to measure the similarity between two robots. Based on this similarity a robot can choose which robot to imitate. The affinity of two robots with respect to imitation is most reasonably measured by calculating their behavioral difference, since the goal of imitation is learning new behavior. This is accomplished by each robot individually constructing an Affordance Network which is a Bayesian network upon its conditional affordance probabilities in the environment. An affordance represents the interaction possibilities an object provides to the robot. These Affordance Networks are then compared with a new metric.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
. Balch, T. Behavioral Diversity in Learning Robot Teams. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Dec. 1998.
A. Billard and M. J. Mataric. Learning human arm movements by imitation: : Evaluation of a biologically inspired connectionist architecture. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 37(2-3):145-160, 2001.
E. Burnstein, E. Stotland, and A. Zander. Similarity to a model and self-evaluation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62:257-264, 1961.
N. Cesa-Bianchi, Y. Freund, D. Haussler, D. P. Helmbold, R. E. Schapire, and M. K. Warmuth. How to use expert advice. J. ACM, 44(3):427-485, 1997.
. K. Dautenhahn and C. Nehaniv. An agent-based per- spective on imitation, 2002.
. P. J. D. et. al. On graphs with unique node labels. In Graph Based Representations in Pattern Recognition, volume 2726, pages 409-437, Heidelberg, DE, 2003. Springer Berlin.
. P. Fitzpatrick, G. Metta, L. Natale, S. Rao, and G. Sandini. Learning about objects through action-initial steps towards artificial cognition. Robotics and Automation, 2003. Proceedings. ICRA’03. IEEE International Conference on, 3, 2003.
. N. Friedman. Learning belief networks in the presence of missing values and hidden variables. In Proc. 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 125-133. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.
J. Gibson. The theory of affordances. In R.Shaw and J.Brandsford, editors, Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward and Ecological Psychology, pages 62-82. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977.
J. J. Gibson. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Houghton-Mifflin Company, Boston, 1966.
D. Heckerman, D. Geiger, and D. M. Chickering. Learning bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data. Mach. Learn., 20(3):197-243, 1995.
. A. Ijspeert, J. Nakanishi, and S. Schaal. Movement imitation with nonlinear dynamical systems in humanoid robots, 2002.
. M. Kopicki, A. Sloman, J. Wyatt, and R. Dearden. Learning object affordances by imitation. Technical report, The University of Birmingham, 2005.
. M. Lopes, F. Melo, and L. Montesano. Affordance-based imitation learning in robots. In 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007.
E. Oztop, N. Bradley, and M. Arbib. Infant grasp learning: a computational model. Experimental Brain Research, 158(4):480-503, 2004.
. A. Slocum, D. Downey, and R. Beer. Further Experiments in the Evolution of Minimally Cognitive Behavior: From Perceiving Affordances to Selective Attention. From Animals to Animats 6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, 2000.
A. Ude, T. Shibata, and C. G. Atkeson. Real-time visual system for interaction with a humanoid robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 37(2-3):115-125, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Golombek, R., Richert, W., Kleinjohann, B., Adelt, P. (2008). Measurement of Robot Similarity to Determine the Best Demonstrator for Imitation in a Group of Heterogeneous Robots. In: Hinchey, M., Pagnoni, A., Rammig, F.J., Schmeck, H. (eds) Biologically-Inspired Collaborative Computing. BICC 2008. IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 268. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09655-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09655-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09654-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09655-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)