Skip to main content

Response to Intervention and Positive Behavior Support

  • Chapter
Handbook of Positive Behavior Support

Part of the book series: Issues in Clinical Child Psychology ((ICCP))

Abstract

Special education in the United States emerged as an extension of the medical model that experienced explosive growth in the decades of the fifties and sixties (cf. Sailor & Guess, 1980). The construct of disability (or “handicap” as it was largely described in that period) placed the locus of educational impairment squarely on the individual. Failure to progress educationally or developmentally along expected age norms was considered the result of a quasi-disease state. This was during the testing movement, when the fields of psychiatry and psychology were growing rapidly. Thus, when a pattern of deficit in educational progress was determined, the student would be referred for diagnostic testing. Analysis of test results would then determine a likely category of disability, and a prescription would result, often in the form of referral to special education, usually to a special class formed to address the needs of students in that category.

More recently, a different logic model has begun to emerge for providing services and supports to students who fail to progress as expected in the general curriculum, one that stands in contrast to the extant medical model and challenges it as having the potential to be a better service model. Response to intervention (RTI) is the prevalent term for this logic model, and as of this writing, it is gaining rapid momentum across all aspects of preschool through 12-grade education in America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (1996). Policies and practices for addressing barriers to student learning and current status and new directions (SMHS Policy Report). Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Mental Health in Schools, Department of Psychology

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2006). The school leader's guide to student learning supports: New directions for addressing barriers to learning. Thousands Oaks, CA: Cor-win Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergan, J. R., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York: Plenum

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, J., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Davies, E., Levine, P., Newman, L., et al. (with Chorost, M., Garza, N., & Guzman, A.). (2003). Engagement, academics, social development, and independence: The achievements of elementary and middle school students with disabilities. Review draft. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R., & Danielson, L. (2004). The Office of Special Education Program's LD Initiative: A context for inquiry and consensus. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 186–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Doolittle, J. (2007). Responsiveness to intervention: 1997 to 2007. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.). (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2005). Response to intervention principles and strategies for effective practice. New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey, E., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Differences in performance between students with learning disabilities and mild mental retardation: Implications for categorical instruction. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22, 119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. H. (1995). Behavior problems in preschool childr en: A review of recent r esear ch. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 36, 113–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, G., & Grunebaum, H. (1967). Perspectives on primary prevention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 17, 331–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. T., Helms, J. E., & Juby, H. L. (2004). The relationship between racism and racial identity for white Americans: A profile analysis. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 32, 2–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S. (2000). The academic achievement challenge: What really works in the classroom? New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, L. K., & Dahlquist, C. M. (2002). Functional assessment: Strategies to prevent and remediate challenging behavior in school settings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Children's Behavioral Alliance. (2003). In the best interests of all: A position paper of the Children's Behavioral Alliance. Retrieved December 11, 2004, from http://www. chadd.org/pdfs/inthebestinterestsofall.pdf

  • Conroy, M. A., & Brown, W. H. (2004). Early identification, prevention, and early intervention with young children at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders: Issues, trends, and a call for action. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 224–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortiella, C. (2006). A parent's guide to response-to-intervention [Web site]. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www/ncld.org/images/stories/downloads/parent_ center/rti_final.pdf

  • Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Harn, B. A. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 9–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, D. A., & Horner, R.H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools. New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, D. A., Horner, R. H., & Hawken, L. S. (2004). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program. New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. N., Lindo, E. J., & Compton, D. L. (2007). Children at risk for reading failure. Constructing an early screening measure. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Minneapolis, MN: Leadership Training Institute for Special Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J., Lee, S. W., & Tollefson, N. (2001). A reliability and validity study of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills—modified. School Psychology Review, 30, 33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M. (2007). Response to intervention: Examining Classroom behaviour support in second grade. Exceptional Children, 73, 288–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Feil, E. G., Severson, H. H., & Walker, H. M. (1998). Screening for emotional and behavioral delays: The Early Screening Project. Journal of Early Interventions, 21, 252–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forness, S. R., & Kavale, K. A. (2000). Emotional or behavioral disorders: Background and current status of the E/BD terminology and definition. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 264–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). Responsiveness to Intervention: Preventing and identifying mathematics disability. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(4), 60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Bouton, B., Caffrey, E., & Hill, L. (2007). Dynamic assessment as responsiveness to intervention. A scripted protocol to identify young at-risk readers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 58–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute of the Development of Education Achievement. Available at http://dibel.uoregon.edu

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F., & Elliott, S. (1990). The social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2001). Social competence of students with high-incidence disabilities: Conceptual and methodological issues in interpreting outcomes of social skills training. Exceptional Children, 67, 311–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, B., & Justice, K. (2006). RTI and the classroom teacher. A guide for fostering teacher buy-in and supporting the intervention process. Horsham, PA: LRM

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., Holtzman, W. H., & Messick, S. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: Equity through valid educational practices. Final report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 1083–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., Todd, A. W., Lewis-Palmer, T., Irvin, L. K., Sugai, G., & Boland, J. B. (2004). The School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 1998, P.L. 105-17, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004, P.L. 108–446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Kame'enui, E. J. (2007). Responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, B. K., & Deshler, D. D. (2004). Teaching content to all. Evidence-based inclusive practices in middle and secondary schools. Boston: Pearson

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Torgesen, J. K., Wood, F., et al. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In C. E. Finn Jr., A. J. Rotherham, & C. R. Hokanson Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259–287). Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • McCook, J. E. (2006). The RTI guide: Developing and implementing a model in your schools. Horsham, PA: LRP

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P. A., Goldberg, M. M., Watkins, M. W., Stanley, J. L., & Glutting, J. J. (2006). A nationwide epidemiologic modeling study of LD: Risk, protection, and unintended impact. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 230–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMasters, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2005). Responding to non-responders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, K. W. (1993). School social behavior scales. Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, K. W. (2001). Assessment of children's social skills: Recent developments, best practices, and new directions. Exceptionality, 9(1/2), 3–18,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE). (2006). Response to intervention policy consideration and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Culturally Responsive Education Systems. (2005). Cultural considerations and challenges in response-to-intervention models (NCCRESt position statement). Retrived June 23, 2007, from http://www.ncrest.org/publications/ position_statements.html

  • National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. Retrieved June 23, 2007, from www.Idonline.org/njcld

  • National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (2007). Responsiveness to intervention school-based practices. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from www.nrcld.org/rti_ practices/indelc.html

  • Nelson, J. R., Martella, R., & Marchand-Martella, N. (2002). Maximizing student learning: The effects of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Surgeon General. (2001). Youth violence: A report of the surgeon general. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, A., & Yates, J. (2002). Considerations in the assessment of English language learners referred to special education. In A. Artiles & A. Ortiz (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment and instruction (pp. 65–86). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems

    Google Scholar 

  • Osher, D., Dwyer, K., & Jackson, S. (2003). Safe, supportive, and successful schools: Step by step. Longmont, CO: Sopris West

    Google Scholar 

  • President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. R. (1987). Manual for the revised behavior problem checklist. Coral Gables, FL: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. (2005). Learning disabilities: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 510–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, D. J., Tilly, W. D., III, Grimes, J. P. (1998). Functional and noncategorical identification and intervention in special education. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailor, W., & Guess, D. (1980). Severly Handicapped Students. An Instructional Design. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailor, W., Stowe, M. J., Turnbull, R., III, & Kleinhammer-Tramill, P. J. (2007). A case for adding a social-behavioral standard to standards-based education with school-wide positive behavior support as its basis. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandomierski, T., Kincaid, D., & Algozzine, B. (2007). Response to intervention and positive behavior support: Brothers from different mothers or sisters with different misters? PBIS Newsletter 4(2). Retrieved October 5, 2007, from www.pbis.org/new/ New/Newsletters/Newsletter4-2.aspx

  • Sanetti, L. H., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2005). Treatment integrity assessment within a problem-solving model. In R. Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Assessment for intervention: A problem-solving approach (pp. 304–325). New York: Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sideridis, G., Morgan, P. L., Botsas, G., Padeliadu, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Predicting LD on the basis of motivation, metacognition, and psychopathology: An ROC analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 215–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simeonsson, R. J. (1994). Risk, resilience, and prevention: Promoting the well-being of all children. Baltimore: Brookes

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. W., & Gilles, D. L. (2003). Using key instructional elements to systematically promote social skills generalization for students with challenging behavior. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speece, D. L., Case-Pericola, L., & Eddy-Molloy, D. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stecker, P. M. (2007). Tertiary intervention. Using progress monitoring with intensive services. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). Introduction to the special series on positive behavior support in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(3), 130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Gresham, F. M. (2002). Behaviorally effective school environments. In M. Shinn, H. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II (pp. 315–350). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, B. D. (1997). Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? And other conversations about race: A psychologist explains the development of racial identity (rev. ed). New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. S., & Conroy, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58, 78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, B. J., White, R., Johnston, S., & Dunlap, G. (2005). Positive behavior support as a family-centered endeavor. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S. (2003). How many tiers are needed for response to intervention to achieve acceptable prevention outcomes? Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Response to Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO. December 4, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). Group size and time allotted to intervention: Effects for students with reading difficulties. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 275–298). Parkton, MD: York Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., & Roberts, G. (2007). Secondary interventions in reading. Providing additional instruction for students at risk. Teaching Exceptional Children 39(5), 40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. H. (1992). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD) (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: Oregon Research Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., Severson, H. H., Todis, B. J., Black-Pedego, A. E., Williams, G. J., Haring, N. G., et al. (1990). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD): Further validation, replication, and normative data. Remedial and Special Education, 11(2), 32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Stratton, C. (1997). From parent training to community building. Families in Society, 78(2), 156–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehby, J. H., Lane, K. L., & Falk, K. B. (2003). Academic instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 194–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyke, J. (2005). Assessment and decision making for students with learning disabilities: What if this is as good as it gets? Learning Disability Quarterly 28, 125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., Graden, J., Wesson, C., Algozzine, B., & Deno, S. (1983). Generalizations from five years of research on assessment and decision making: The University of Minnesota Institute. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4, 75–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sailor, W., Doolittle, J., Bradley, R., Danielson, L. (2009). Response to Intervention and Positive Behavior Support. In: Sailor, W., Dunlap, G., Sugai, G., Horner, R. (eds) Handbook of Positive Behavior Support. Issues in Clinical Child Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09632-2_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics