Skip to main content

Conclusion: Learning About Social Movements from East Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1994 Accesses

Part of the book series: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies ((NCSS))

Abstract

Besides being fascinating accounts of social movements, what lessons for social movement theory do these chapters offer? Do they tell us anything about the role of culture in social movement theory? Do they introduce new concepts and theories that can expand our analytical toolkit? The concept of culture poses a challenge for the dominant structural-instrumental-mechanism school of social movement theory. Let us first review the origins and content of that challenge. Then we can assess what new tools may be emerging from East Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Under criticism, Tarrow first weakened his claims for the explanatory power of POS structuralism without explicitly acknowledging so (Kurzman 2004), and then finally published a rejection of the approach titled “Confessions of a Recovering Structuralist” (Tarrow 2005).

  2. 2.

    Tilly’s article “Useless Durkheim” illustrates how structuralists reject out of hand ideas of the effect of collective values on social movements (Tilly 1981).

References

  • Alexander, Jeffrey. 2003. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert Neelly. 1967. “Civil Religion in America.” Daedelus 96(1, Winter):1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, Robert and David Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1983. “The Forms of Capital.” pp. 241–58 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. Richardson. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1999. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” pp. 53–75 in State/Culture State-Formation After the Cultural Turn, edited by G. Steinmetz. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, Jeffrey. 1982. State and Citizen in Japan: Social Structure and Policy-Making in the Development of a ‘New Industrial City,’ 1960–1980. Harvard University (doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Sociology): University Microfilms International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, Jeffrey. 1986. “The Ties That Bind: Social Fabric and the Mobilization of Environmental Movements in Japan.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 4:227–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, Jeffrey. 1988. “State as Process: The Effect of Party and Class on Citizen Participation in Japanese Local Government.” Social Problems 35(2):131–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, Jeffrey. 1998. Environmental Politics in Japan: Networks of Power and Protest. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, Jeffrey. 2003. “Movement in Context: Thick Networks and Japanese Environmental Protest.” pp. 204–229 in Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by M. Diani and D. McAdam. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, Jeffrey. 2005. “Identity Dynamics: Motivations and Movement Mobilizations in the US and Japan.” In Threats and Opportunities in Contentious Politics, edited by C. Tilly and M. Kousis. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48:147–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1966. Suicide, a Study in Sociology. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103(2):281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai. 1975. A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organization. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter, Dietrich Rueschmeyer, and Theda Skocpol. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman, Ron and Andrew Jamieson. 1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. University Park, TX: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1972. POWER/KNOWLEDGE. New York, NY: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” pp. 208–226 in Ichel. Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by P. Rabinow and H. Dreyfus. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, Roger and Robert Alford. 1991. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” pp. 232–63 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. Powell and P. DiMaggio. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. 1992. “The Social Psychology of Collective Action.” pp. 53–76 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by A. D. Morris and C. McClurg Mueller. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1983. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis an Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Jeff. and James M Jasper. 2004. “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory.” pp. 3–30 in Rethinking Social Movements Structure, Meaning, and Emotion, edited by J. Goodwin and J. M. Jasper. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action, Social Structure, and Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3, November):481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, John. 1992. “The Capital(s) of Cultures: A Nonholistic Approach to Status Situations, Class, Gender and Ethnicity.” In Cultivating Differences Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by M. Lamont and M. Fournier. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Lynn. 1984. “Charles Tilly's Collective Action.” pp. 244–275 in Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, edited by T. Skocpol. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, James. 1997. The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman, Charles. 2004. “The Poststructuralist Consensus in Social Movement Theory.” pp. 111–20 in Rethinking Social Movements Structure, Meaning, and Emotion, edited by J. Goodwin and J. M. Jasper. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Nan. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug. 1988. Freedom Summer. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug. 1996. “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” pp. 23–40 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings, edited by D. McAdam, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug., Sidney G. Tarrow, and Charles. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82(6):1212–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1995. “The Process of Collective Identity.” pp. 41–63 in Social Movements and Culture, edited by H. Johnston and B. Klandermans. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge Cultural Social Studies. Cambridge [England] New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Aldon D. 1984. The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakane, Chie. 1970. Japanese Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, Jeffrey. 1975. Agrarian Revolution. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poletta, Francesca. 2004. “Culture is not Just in Your Head.” pp. 97–110 in Rethinking Social Movements Structure, Meaning, and Emotion, edited by J. Goodwin and J. M. Jasper. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poletta, Francesca and James Jasper. 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27:283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, Kent, Daniel Martin, and Gary Fine. 2003. Symbols, Selves and Social Reality. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. Richard. 2001. Institutions and Organizations. 2nd ed. Foundations for Organizational Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, William J. Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98:1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil. 1963. The Theory of Collective Behavior. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, Ann. 1995. “Cultural Power and Social Movements.” pp. 3–24 in Social Movements and Culture, edited by H. Johnston and B. Klandermans. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney G. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 2nd ed. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison/Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, Capital and European States: AD 990–1992. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1999. “Now Where?” pp. 407–19 in State/Culture: State-Formation After the Cultural Turn, edited by G. Steinmetz. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1981. “Useless Durkheim.” In As Sociology Meets History, edited by C. Tilly. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. and Sidney G. Tarrow. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, Alain, Hegedus Zsuzsa, Francois Dubet, and Michael Wieviorka. 1983. Anti-Nuclear Protest. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Ralph. 1981. “Collective Behavior and Resource Mobilization as Approaches to Social Movements: Issues and Continuities.” Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 4:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1946. “The Social Psychology of the World Religions.” pp. 267–301 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by M. Weber, C. W. Mills and H. H. Gerth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1951. The Religion of China. Translated by H. Gerth. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society, Vols 1 & 2. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Merry. 1992. The Japanese Overseas: Can They Go Home Again? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittier, Nancy. 2002. “Meaning and Structure in Social Movements.” pp. 289–308 in Social Movements: Identity, Culture and the State, edited by D. Meyer, N. Whittier and B. Robnet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, Mayer N. 1992. “Looking Backward to Look Forward: Reflections on the Past and Future of the Resource Mobilization Research Program.” pp. 326–48 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by A. D. Morris and C. McClurg Mueller. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Broadbent .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Broadbent, J. (2011). Conclusion: Learning About Social Movements from East Asia. In: Broadbent, J., Brockman, V. (eds) East Asian Social Movements. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09626-1_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics