Encompassing Prior Based Model Selection for Inequality Constrained Analysis of Variance

  • Irene KlugkistEmail author
Part of the Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences book series (SSBS)


In Chapter 2, three psychological datasets with competing, informative hypotheses were introduced. For instance, with respect to the Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) data of Huntjens, two competing theories about interidentity amnesia were presented [11]. Some believe that information provided to one identity cannot be retrieved by another identity of the DID-patient; that is, there is no transfer of information between identities.


Model Selection Prior Distribution Marginal Likelihood Unconstrained Model Prior Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Akaike, H.: Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332 (1987)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Berger, J.O., Delempady, M.: Testing precise hypotheses. Statistical Science, 2, 317–352 (1987)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Berger, J., Pericchi, L.: Objective Bayesian methods for model selection: Introduction and comparison. In: Lahiri, P. (ed) Model Selection. Monograph Series, Lecture Notes Vol. 38 pp. 135–207. Beachwood OH (2001)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bernardo, J.M., Smith, A.F.M.: Bayesian Theory. Chichester, Wiley (1994)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Boelen, P.A., Bout, J. van den: Complicated grief, depression, and anxiety as distinct post-loss syndromes: A confirmatory factor analysis study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 2175–2177 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Boelen, P.A., Keijser, J. de, Bout, J. van den: Psychometrische eigenschappen van de Rouw VragenLijst (RVL) [Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Traumatic Grief]. Gedrag & Gezondheid, 29, 172–185 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bozdogan, H.: Model selection and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytic extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370 (1987)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Carlin, B.P., Chib, S.: Bayesian model choice via Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 57, 473–484 (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Chib, S.: Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1313–1321 (1995)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Cohen, J.: The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 12, 997–1003 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Huntjens, R.J.C., Peters, M.L., Woertman, L., Bovenschen, L.M., Martin, R.C., Postma, A.: Inter-identity amnesia in dissociative identity disorder: A simulated memory impairment? Psychological Medicine, 36, 857–863 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Jefferys, W., Berger, J.: Ockham’s razor and Bayesian analysis. American Scientist, 80, 64–72 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kass, R.E., Raftery, A.E.: Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795 (1995)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kato, B.S., Hoijtink, H.: A Bayesian approach to inequality constrained hierarchical models: Estimation and model selection. Statistical Modelling, 6, 231–249 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Klugkist, I., Hoijtink, H.: The Bayes Factor for inequality and about equality constrained models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 6367–6379 (2007)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Klugkist, I., Kato, B., Hoijtink, H.: Bayesian model selection using encompassing priors. Statistica Neerlandica, 59, 57–69, (2005)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Klugkist, I., Laudy, O., Hoijtink, H.: Inequality constrained analysis of variance: A Bayesian approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 477–493 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Laudy, O., Hoijtink, H.: Bayesian methods for the analysis of inequality constrained contingency tables. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16, 123–138 (2007)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Laudy, O.: Bayesian Evaluation of Equality and Inequality Constrained Hypotheses for Contingency Tables. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University (2006)Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Lindley, D.V.: A statistical paradox. Biometrika, 44, 187–192 (1957)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Newton, M.A., Raftery, A.E.: Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 56, 3–48 (1994)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Reijntjes, A., Dekovic, M., Vermande, M., Telch, M.: The role of depressive symptoms in early adolescents online emotional responding to a peer evaluation challenge. Depression and Anxiety (in press)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Smith, A.F.M., Spiegelhalter, D.J.: Bayes factors and choice criteria for linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 42, 213–220 (1980)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Methodology and StatisticsUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations