A Psychologist’s View on Bayesian Evaluation of Informative Hypotheses
Psychologists, like other scientists, gather and analyse data to evaluate the explanatory power of theories. Typically they build on earlier studies, explicitly or implicitly formulating competing hypotheses and inferring different predictions about, for instance, the relative scores of different groups on an outcome measure in an experimental study. As a means to test their theories, psychologists are accustomed to the classical statistical tradition and most of them apply null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) that is dominant within this tradition. They are trained to use the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), which centers on NHST, and train their students to do the same.
KeywordsStructural Equation Modeling Bayesian Approach Dissociative Identity Disorder Structural Equation Modeling Framework Bayesian Evaluation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hoijtink, H.: Beter een goed verhaal dan de hele waarheid [A good story is better than the whole truth]. In: Bronner, A.E., Dekker, P., de Leeuw, E., de Ruyter, K., Smidts, A., Wieringa, J.E. (eds) Ontwikkelingen in het Marktonderzoek [Developments in Market Research] (pp. 201–212). Haarlem, De Vrieseborch (2005)Google Scholar
- Krueger, J.I., Funder, D.C.: Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 313–376 (2004)Google Scholar
- Masson, M.E.J., Loftus, G.R.: Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203–220 (2003)Google Scholar
- Matthews, G., Deary, I.J., Whiteman, M.C.: Personality Traits (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press (2003)Google Scholar
- Spiegelhalter, D.J., Myles, J.P., Jones, D.R., Abrams, K.R.: An introduction to Bayesian methods in health technology assessment. British Medical Journal, 319, 508–512 (1999)Google Scholar