Building and sustaining cultures of peace does not mean eliminating conflict. Rather, conflict is to be expected. Sharp, even profound, disagreements among groups are almost inevitable in any social setting. These disagreements may be or become deeply divisive and threaten to split the community on moral or political grounds. The challenge for building a culture of peace, therefore, becomes how such contention is expressed and managed. This involves building institutions that are authoritative and legitimate and altering behavioral repertoires among community members so that conflicts can be waged short of violence. This chapter argues that nonviolent action, as a method of making contention, makes three important contributions to building and sustaining a culture of peace. First, nonviolent means of struggle promote social norms that eschew violence, even without any kind of overarching commitment to pacifism. Second, nonviolent struggle helps to build trust among individuals and groups, even when they find themselves in contention. Third, the structural requirements for effective nonviolent action diffuse power throughout society—effectively empowering groups who might otherwise be excluded, broadening democratic participation, and valuing inter-group communication.
The repertoire of nonviolent methods for contentious action has important consequences for each of these approaches to building peaceful communities. It does this by virtue of the characteristics of engaging in nonviolent action as well as by the behavioral consequences of its practice. In addition, it promotes institutions that are responsive to community interests and needs, reflect norms of social justice, and are generally effective in their actions. Such institutions will have deeper legitimacy and consequently will be able to act with greater authority. Of vital importance, these institutions will also be perceived as legitimate venues for conflict resolution and for contention.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, D. (2002). The American peace movements. Available electronically at http://www.cul-ture-of-peace.info/apm/title-page.html. (Originally published in a print edition, 1985, New Haven, CT: Advocate Press.)
Ackerman, P., & Kruegler, C. (1994). Strategic nonviolent conflict. Westport, CT: Greenwood
Ackerman, P., & Duvall, J. (2000). A force more powerful: A century of nonviolent conflict. New York: Palgrave
Atack, I. (2006). Nonviolent political action and the limits of consent. Theoria, 111: 87–107
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books
Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. (1994). Empowering teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
Boulding, K. E. (1989). Three faces of power. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Briggs, X. S. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 177–221
Burrowes, R. J. (1996). The strategy of nonviolence defense: A Gandhian approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
Chabot, S. (2000). A culture of peace in motion: Transnational diffusion of the Gandhian repertoire from India to the U.S. civil rights movement. International Journal of Humanities and Peace, 16(1)
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. NY: Free Press
Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict development and civilization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Gil, D. G. (1996). Preventing violence in a structurally violent society: Mission impossible. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66(1), 77–84
Guidry, J. A, & Sawyer, M. Q. (2003). Contentious pluralism: The public sphere and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 1(2), 273–289
Hardin, R. (2002) Trust and tustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Jenkins, J. C., & Bond, D. (2001). Conflict carrying capacity, political crisis and reconstruction: A framework for the early warning of political system vulnerability. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(2), 3–31
Kelman, H. C. (1997). Group processes in the resolution of international conflicts: Experiences from the Israeli-Palestinian case. American Psychologist, 52(3), 212–220
Kriesberg, L. (1998). Constructive conflicts: From escalation to resolution. Lanham, MD.: Rowman & Littlefield
Martin, B. (1989). Gene Sharp's theory of power. Journal of Peace Research, 26(2), 213–222
Martin, B. (1993). Social defense, social change. London: Freedom Press
McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2000). Nonviolent action as contentious interaction. PS: Political Science and Politics 33(2):149–154
Michaud, H. (2005) Roses, cedars and orange ribbons: A wave of non-violent revolution. Radio Netherlands Worldwide. Accessed at http://www.radionetherlands.nl/documentaries/050629doc
Montville, J. S. (1997). Ethnic conflict. In R. S. Powers & W. B. Vogele (Eds.), Protest, power and change: An encyclopedia of nonviolent struggle from ACT-UP to Women's Suffrage. New York: Garland
Northrup, T. A. (1997). Identity theory. In R. S. Powers & W. B. Vogele (Eds), Protest, power and change: An encyclopedia of nonviolent struggle from ACT-UP to Women's Suffrage. New York: Garland
Osgood, C. E. (1966). Perspective in foreign policy. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books
Parkman, P. (1990). Insurrectionary Civic Strikes in Latin America 1931–1961. Cambridge, MA: The Albert Einstein Institution
Platt, J. (1973). Social traps. American psychologist. 28:641–651
Rubin, J., Pruitt, D., & .Kim, S. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate and settlement. New York: McGraw-Hill
Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press
Seligman, A. (1997). The problem of trust. New York: Princeton University Press
Sharp, G. (1973). Politics of nonviolent action, Vols.1–3. Boston: Porter Sargent
Sharp, G. (2005). Waging nonviolent struggle: 20th century practice and 21st century potential. Boston: Porter Sargent
Vogele, W. B. (1994). Stepping back: Nuclear arms control and the end of the cold war. Westport, CT: Praeger
Williams, B. (1988). Formal structures and social reality. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cromwell, M., Vogele, W.B. (2009). Nonviolent Action, Trust and Building a Culture of Peace. In: de Rivera, J. (eds) Handbook on Building Cultures of Peace. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09575-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09575-2_16
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09574-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09575-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)