Skip to main content

Academic demands are central to the lives of children living in the information age and in industrial societies. Schools are the workplaces of children and are the gateways into adult work for most adolescents. Historically, academic concerns are the most common reason that children are referred for special education services within schools and are central to many requests for outpatient services (Lloyd, Kauffman, Landrum, & Roe, 1991). The synergy between children's academic and social/emotional functioning creates a complex interrelationship in which mental health problems can adversely affect children's educational attainment and academic success affects mental health (Johnson, McGue, & Iacono, 2006). Children who suffer from depression, anxiety, or Attention-Deficit/Hyper-activity Disorder (ADHD) are at an apparent disadvantage in attending to, completing, and profiting from instruction. Similarly, children who are at risk for or exhibit conduct problems are at increased risk for poor academic achievement that may result from the interaction of diverse factors (Montague, Enders, & Castro, 2005). The synergy also exists when examined from the opposite perspective. Children who repeatedly fail at school are more likely to exhibit anxiety, depression, negative self-esteem, and conduct problems (Jimerson, Carlson, Rotert, Egeland, & Sroufe, 1997).

When phenomena co-occur, the question of causation naturally arises. Are the client's academic difficulties the result of psychopathology such as a depressive disorder, is the depressive disorder the result of frustration and chronic failure at school, or are both concerns the result of a third factor? The limitations of correlational and epidemiological research likely preclude a strong determination of a causal connection between psychopathology and academic performance. Additionally, the ways psychopathology and academic attainment interact may be substantively idiographic. For some children, psychopathology may create substantive barriers to academic achievement; for others, psychopathological symptoms may be largely the result of chronic negative environmental events resulting from academic failure that are nearly inescapable due to mandatory school attendance. Although parents and teachers may view psychopathology as causing academic concerns, for some children academic concerns may be an important stressor contributing to psychopathology (Jimerson et al., 1997; Kelley, Reitman, & Noell, 2002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association on Mental Retardation (2002). Definition of mental retardation. Retrieved February 20, 2007, from the AAMR website: http://www.aamr.org/Poli-cies/faq_mental_retardation.shtml.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardoin, S. P., Witt, J. C., Connell, J. E., & Koenig, J. (2005). Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 362–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardoin, S. P., Witt, J. C., Suldo, S. M., Connell, J. E., Koenig, J. L., Resetar, J. L., & Slider, N. J. (2004). Examining the incremental benefits of administering a maze and three versus one curriculum-based measurement reading probe when conducting universal screening. School Psychology Review, 33, 218–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, J., Faraone, S. V., Mick, E., Williamson, S., Wilens, T. E., Spencer, T. J., Weber, W., Jetton, J., Kraus, I., Pert, J., & Zallen, B. (1999). Clinical correlates of ADHD in females: Findings from a large group of girls ascertained from pediatric and psychiatric referral sources. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 38, 966–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruininks, R. H., Woodcock, R. W., Weatherman, R. F., & Hill, B. K. (1996). Scales of Independent Behavior—Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christ, T. J. (2006). Short term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimates of standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals. School Psychology Review, 35, 128–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christ, T. J., & Silberglitt, B. (in press). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: The standard error of measurement. School Psychology Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. E., Jr. (2006). Constructing a math applications, curriculum-based assessment: An analysis of the relationship between applications problems, computation problems and criterion-referenced assessments. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information & Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K. (1997). Conners' Rating Scales-Revised. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, A. J. (1997, norms; 1988, content). KeyMath-revised/Normative update. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Harn, B. A. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cybriwsky, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (1990). Using constant time delay procedures to teach multiplication facts. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 11, 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • 10/31/2008 6:30PM

    Google Scholar 

  • Demchak, M. (1990). Response prompting and fading methods: A review. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 603–615.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P. K. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Marston, D. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests (Research Report No. 22). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockrell, J. E., & Shield, B. M. (2006). Acoustical barriers in classrooms: The impact of noise on performance in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duhon, G. J., Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Freeland, J. T., Dufrene, B. A., & Gilbertson, D. N. (2004). Identifying academic skill and performance deficits: The experimental analysis of brief assessments of academic skills. School Psychology Review, 33, 429–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, L. K., & Dunlap, G. (1989). A self-monitoring package for teaching subtraction with regrouping to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 309–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espin, C., Shin, J., Deno, S. L., Skare, S., Robinson, S., & Benner, B. (2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. Journal of Special Education, 34, 140–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J. F., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., Espy, K. A., Francis, D. J., Davidson, K. C., Rourke, B. P., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1989). Comparison of cutoff and regression-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 334–338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Morris, R. D., Lyon, G. R. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of learning disabilities in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 506–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • J. D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Lyon, G. R., Foorman, B. R., Stuebing, K. K, & Shaywitz, B. A. (1998). Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 186–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Barnes, M., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Olson, R. K., & Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.) Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 185–250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. J., Fuchs, L. S., Good, R. H., III, O'Connor, R. E., Simmons, D. C., Tindal, G., & Torgesen, J. K. (2002). Analysis of reading assessments instruments for K-3: Results by grade. Retrieved August 24, 2003, from http://idea.uoregon.edu/assess-ment/analysis_results/se_lists/assess_grade.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, C. (1987). Alternative assessment committee report: Curriculum-based assessment. CASP Today, 36, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1992). Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 58, 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1994). Must instructional useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children, 61, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptu-alizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Allinder, R. M. (1989). The reliability and validity of skills analysis within curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique, 14, 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Thompson, A., Roberts, P. H., Kubek, P., & Stecker, P. M. (1994). Technical features of a mathematics concepts and applications curriculum-based measurement system. Diagnostique, 19, 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansle, K. A., Gilbertson, D. N. & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2006). Elementary school teachers' perceptions of curriculum-based measures of written expression. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 11(5), 1–17. Available online: http://pareon-line.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=5.

  • Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Naquin, G. M., & Slider, N. J. (2002). Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternate measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing. School Psychology Review, 31, 477–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., Vanderheyden, A. M., Slider, N. J., Hoffpauir, L. D., Whit-marsh, E. L., & Naquin, G. M. (2004). An examination of the criterion validity and sensitivity to brief intervention of alternate curriculum-based measures of writing skill. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansle, K. A., VanDerHeyden, A. M., Noell, G. H., Resetar, J. L., & Williams, K. L. (2006). The technical adequacy of curriculum-based and rating-based measures of written expression for elementary school students.School Psychology Review 35, 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., III, & Kaminski, R. A. (2002).Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., III, & Shinn, M. R. (1990). Forecasting accuracy of slope estimates for reading curriculum-based measurement: Empirical evidence.Behavioral Assessment 12, 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., III, Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision making utility of continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third grade high-stakes outcomes.Scientific Studies of Reading 5, 257–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., III. (2004). Using the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy (DIBELS). Retrieved May 10th, 2004, fromhttp://dibels.uoregon.edu/index.php.

  • Granger, D. A., Whalen, C. K., Henker, B., & Cantwell, C. (1996). ADHD boys' behavior during structured classroom social activities: Effects of social demands, teacher proximity, and methylphenidate.Journal of Attention Disorders 1, 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.)Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467– 519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., & Gansle, K. A. (1992). Misguided assumptions of DSM—III—R: Implications for school psychological practice.School Psychology Quarterly 7, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresham. F. M., & Witt, J. C. (1997). Utility of intelligence tests for treatment planning, classification, and placement decisions: Recent empirical findings and future directions.School Psychology Quarterly 12, 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D. D., & Larsen, S. C. (1996).Test of written language (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handen, B. L., & Zane, T. (1987). Delayed prompting: A review of procedural variations and results.Research in Developmental Disabilities 8, 307–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton & C. L. Hansen (Eds.)The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. N., & O'Brien, W. H. (2000).Principles and practices of behavioral assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heward, W. L. (2006).Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heward, W. L., Courson, F. H., & Narayan, J. S. (1989). Using choral responding to increase active student response during group instruction.Teaching Exceptional Children 21, 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, H. D., Hieronymus, A. N., Frisbie, D. A., & Dunbar, S. B. (1996).Iowa tests of basic skills. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosp, J. L., & Ardoin, S. P. (in press). Assessment for instructional planning.Assessment for Effective Intervention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007).The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, K. W., & Nolet, V. (2000).Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1400et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Vollmer, T. R., & Zarcone, J. R. (1990). The experimental (functional) analysis of behavior disorders: Methodology, applications, and limitations. In A. C. Repp & N. N. Singh (Eds.)Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 301–330). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, J., & Malecki, C. K. (2005). The utility of CBM written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production-independent, and accurate-production scores.School Psychology Review 34, 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson, S., Carlson, E., Rotert, M., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). A prospective, longitudinal study of the correlates and consequences of early grade retention.Journal of School Psychology 35, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on academic achievement trajectories during adolescence.Developmental Psychology 42, 514–532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, R. A., & Good III, R. H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills.School Psychology Review 25, 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K. A. (2002). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disability. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.)Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 369–426). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1999). Effectiveness of special education. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.)The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 984– 1024). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. L., Reitman, D., & Noell, G. H. (2002).Practitioner's guide to empirically based measures of school behavior. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N., Nihira, K., & Leland, H. (1993).AAMR adaptive behavior scales'School: 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. W., Kauffman, J. M., Landrum, T. J., & Roe, D. L. (1991). Why do teachers refer pupils for special education? An analysis of referral records.Exceptionality 2, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R. (1996). Learning disabilities.The Future of Children: Special Education for Students with Disabilities 6, 56–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGinitie, W., MacGinitie, R., Maria, R. K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000).Gates–MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, D. L., Gresham, F. M., & Bocian, K. M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation.Journal of Learning Disabilities 31, 314–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, D. L., & Siperstein, G. N. (2002). Learning disabilities as operationally defined by schools. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.)Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 287–333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, D., & Deno, S. L. (1981).The reliability of simple, direct measures of written expression (Research Report No. 50). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, D., & Tindal, G. (1996). Best practices in performance monitoring. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.)Best Practices in School Psychology III. Bethesda, MD: NASP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. I. (1986). Measuring pupil progress: A comparison of standardized achievement tests and curriculum-related measures.Diagnostique 11, 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, B. K. (1992). Contingency and choice: The implications of matching theory for classroom instruction.Journal of Behavioral Education 2, 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, B. K., & Houk, J. L. (1989). The application of Hernstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 51, 17–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., Allsopp, D. H., & Mercer, A. R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, M., Enders, C., & Castro, M. (2005). Academic and behavioral outcomes for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. (2006). What are the benefits of progress monitoring? Retrieved October 02, 2006, from www.studentprogress.org.

  • Nihira, K., Leland, H., & Lambert, N. (1993). AAMR adaptive behavior scales—Residential and community: 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noell, G. H. (2008). Research examining the relationships among consultation process, treatment integrity, and outcomes. In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.) Handbook of research in school consultation: Empirical foundations for the field. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noell, G. H., Freeland, J. T., Witt, J. C., & Gansle, K. A. (2001). Using brief assessments to identify effective interventions for individual students. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noell, G. H., Gansle, K. A., Witt, J. C., Whitmarsh, E. L., Freeland, J. T., LaFleur, L. H., Gilbertson, D. A. & Northup, J. (1998). Effects of contingent reward and instruction on oral reading performance at differing levels of passage difficulty. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 659–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noell, G. H., Gilbertson, D. N., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (2005). Eco-Behav-ioral Assessment and Intervention for Culturally Diverse At-Risk Students. In C. L. Frisby & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.) Comprehensive handbook of multicultural school psychology (pp. 904–927). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Slider, N. J., Connell, J. E., Gatti, S. L., Williams, K. L., Koenig, J. L., Resetar, J. L., & Duhon, G. J. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northup, J., Broussard, C., Jones, K., George, T., Vollmer, T. R., & Herring, M. (1995). The differential effects of teacher and peer attention on the disruptive classroom behavior of three children with a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 227–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (Section 504).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1998). Behavior assessment system for children-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, A. J., & Francis, A. (Eds.). (2000). Expert consensus guideline series: Treatment of psychiatric and behavioral problems in mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 105, 159–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L. (Ed.). (1999). Adaptive behavior and its measurement: Implications for the field of mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Escobar M. D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 998–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberglitt, B., & Hintze, J. M. (2005). Formative assessment using CBM-R cut scores to track progress toward success on state-mandated achievement test: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 304–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C. H., Bamberg, J. W., Smith, E. S., & Powell, S. S. (1993). Cognitive cover, copy, and compare: Subvocal responding to increase rates of accurate division responding. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 14, 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stecker, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2000). Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Technical manual, the Stanford-Binet intelligence scale: 4th ed. Chicago, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurber, R. S., Shinn, M. R., & Smolkowski, K. (2002). What is measured in mathematics tests? Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures. School Psychology Review, 31, 498–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindal, G., & Parker, R. (1989). Assessment of written expression for students in compensatory and special education programs. Journal of Special Education, 23, 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading dif ficulties. Jour nal of School Psychology, 40, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Office of Education. (1977). Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 42, 65082–65085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, J. (1995). Functional assessment and intervention in a regular classroom setting for the disruptive behavior of a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Videen, J., Deno, S., & Marston, D. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (Research Report No. 84). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Shippen, M. E., Alberto, P., Houchins, D. E., & Cihak, D. F. (2005). Using the expressive writing program to improve the writing skills of high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children, 3rd ed., San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, J. C., Daly, E. J., III, & Noell, G. H. (2000). Functional assessments: A step-by-step guide to solving academic and behavior problems. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Cybriwsky, C., Doyle, P. M., Schuster, J. W., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 239–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock—Johnson tests of achievement (3rd ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyke, J. (2001). Reflections on a research career: Generalizations from 25 years of research on assessment and instructional decision making. Exceptional Children, 67, 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Noell, G.H., Ardoin, S.P., Gansle, K.A. (2009). Academic Assessment. In: Matson, J.L., Andrasik, F., Matson, M.L. (eds) Assessing Childhood Psychopathology and Developmental Disabilities. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09528-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics