Skip to main content

Biotechnology and the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry Integration and Impact

  • Chapter
  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

Against the background of important changes under way in the pharmaceutical industries of advanced countries brought about, in part, by advances in biotechnology, this chapter seeks to examine how well-prepared the Indian pharmaceutical industry is to integrate biotechnology techniques to create new drugs. Tracing the evolution of the industry, the chapter proposes a classification of firms according to their technology strategies, revealing the riskaverse attitude of Indian firms. Then it illustrates that while key steps taken by the government of India to promote biotechnology research in public institutes and university departments are laudable, failure on the part of the government to forge effective networks between industry and research institutions for the commercialization of research is a major weakness. Thus integration of biotechnology remains mainly at the level of distribution of imported diagnostic kits and therapeutics with little impact on the industrial structure of the Indian pharmaceutical sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Institut National de Ia Recherche Agronomique (INRA) Grenoble, France.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Affairs Research Group, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  3. “For the first time scientists have been released from the slow and uncertain techniques of trying to improve on nature by breeding mutant strains, and instead have at their fingertips techniques which enable them to do this with a surprising degree of certitude,” M. Sharp (1989) “Biotechnology in Britain and France: The Evolution of Policy”, in Strategies for New Technology: Case Studies from France and Britain, edited by M. Sharp and P. Holmes (London: Philip Alan) pp. 119-159.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Table Top ten biotechnology drugs on the market from “A Survey of Biotechnology and Genetics”, The Economist, 25 February 1995, pp. 1-18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Turcq, D. (1995) “India and China: Asia’s Non-identical Twins”, McKinsey Quarterly, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, Economic Intelligence Service (January 1996) “Drugs and Pharmaceuticals”, India’s Industrial Sector, Bombay.

    Google Scholar 

  7. According to Turq, it is “1/20 to 1/30 of US prices”.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Centre for Monitoring the Indian Economy (April 1996), “The Indian Corporate Sector”, New Delhi, A-27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), (1991) Biotechnology in a Global Economy, US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grabowski, H. and Vernon, J.(1994) “Innovation and Structural Change in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3 (2) pp. 435-449. Pisano, G.P. (1991) “The Governance of Innovation: Vertical Integration and Collaborative Arrangements in the Biotechnology Industry”, Research Policy, 20, pp. 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bull A.T., G. Holt and M.D. Lilly (1982) Biotechnology: International Trends and Perspectives, OECD, Paris; Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) (1991) Biotechnology in a Global Economy, US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office; Orsenigo, L., (1989), “The emergence of biotechnology”, London, Printer Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  12. European Biotech 96 Volatility and Value (1996) Ernst & Young’s Third Annual Report on the European Biotechnology Industry. Biotech 96 Pursuing Sustainability (1996) Ernst & Young’s Tenth Annual Report on the Biotechnology Industry; Joly, D. and Ramani, S.V. (1996) ‘Technology Creation in the Biotechnology Sectors: The French Connection’, International Journal of Technology Management, Special issue on Access to Technological and Financial Resources for SME Innovation, 12 pp. 830–848.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cueni, T. “Pharmaceutical Innovation: Can Europe Compete?” reproduced by Pfizer Forum Europe, as an advertisement in The Economist, 25 February 1995. Cueni is Executive Director of Pharmaceutical Partners for Better Healthcare, which describes itself as a group representing 40 major research-based pharmaceutical companies worldwide.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Probert, J. (1994) “Japanese Pharmaceutical Firms: Players in the European Market?” in Helmut Schutte, The Global Competitiveness of the Asian Firm, New York: St Martin’s Press, p. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmad, H. (1988) Technological Development in Drugs and Pharmaceutical Industry in India, Navrang, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh, S. (1985) Multinational Corporations and Indian Drug Industry, Criterion Publications, New Delhi, p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Japanese, bowing to Western pressure, changed their patent law in 1976. Till the early 1980s Japan banned foreign firms from applying alone for the first stage of regulatory approval and required that the clinical testing for a drug should be carried out on Japanese citizens (Probert, pp. 238, 240).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Redwood, H. (1994) New Horizons in India, Oldwicks Press Ltd, Suffolk, England, pp. 15-22.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kolte, S.B. (1977) “Prices and Profits in the Pharmaceutical Industry”, PhD thesis, Poona University, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Centre for Monitoring the Indian Economy (January 1996); Economic Intelligence Service, Bombay, Indias Industrial Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. In the course of interviewing the firms in the directory a number of firms stated to the author that they plan to enter into biotechnology but have not done so as yet.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sasson, A. (1993) Biotechnologies in Developing Countries: Present and Future, vol. I, UNESCO publication.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Opinions expressed by government officials in interviews.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Adler, P.S. (1989) “Technology Strategy: A Guide to the Literature”, Research in Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, vol. 4, 25–151.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Carvalho, B. (1996) “A New Prescription for Prosperity”, Business World, 6–19 March, pp. 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dibner, M.D., Sollod, C.J., and Sizemore, T.D. (1996) “India, despite Limitations, Strives for Proficiency in Modern Biotech R&D”, Genetic Engineering News, 16 (4) 15 February.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shivanand, K. (1994) “Leaders in Technology”, Business India, 4–17 July, pp. 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Speech by representative of Sol Pharmaceuticals Ltd at the 9th National Conference on In-house R&D in Industry, New Delhi, 28–29 November 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  30. “Potent Beyond Expiry Date”. Economic Times, 2 October 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  31. “Dr Reddy’s Laboratories”, Business India, 12-25 September 1994, p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shivanand, K., “Leaders in Technology”, Business India, 4–17 July 1994, pp. 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  34. (1995) “The Smart Investor”, Business Standard, 5 November.

    Google Scholar 

  35. (February 1995) “Small Firms with Big Ideas”, Business World, pp. 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  36. (September 1995), “Banking on the Nameless”, Global, New Delhi, pp. 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  37. (1995) “Parting Ways”, Business India, 19 June-2 July.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hari, P. (1996) “A New Crucible of Capitalism”, Business World, 6–19 March.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramani, S.V., Venkataramani, M.S. (1999). Biotechnology and the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry Integration and Impact. In: Dzever, S., Jaussaud, J. (eds) China and India. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-333-99508-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics