Advertisement

Institutions, Power Relations and Unequal Integration in the Americas: NAFTA as Deficient Institutionality

Chapter

Abstract

At the Summit of the Americas in Miami, December 1994, the heads of 34 nations in the western hemisphere, led by President Clinton, committed themselves to establishing a Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) by the year 2005. They reconvened in Santiago, Chile, in early 1998 to formally launch the FTAA negotiations. According to the documents signed by the leaders, this massive integration effort will herald a new era of equity, growth and sustainable development. Whether it will actually do so may be questioned by looking at the experience of NAFTA, which has led the integration process in the Americas and has been seen as a model for integration.

Keywords

European Union Intellectual Property Free Trade World Trade Organization Regulatory Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altimir, O. (1994) ‘Income Distribution and Poverty Through Crisis and Adjustment’, CEPAL Review, vol. 52.Google Scholar
  2. Bano, R. (1993)’ socioeconomic Structure and Collective Behaviour’, CEPAL Review, vol. 50.Google Scholar
  3. Bazen, S. and Benhayoun, G. (1992) ‘Low Pay and Wage Regulation in the European Community’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 30(4), pp. 623–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bercusson, B. (1994) ‘Social Policy at the Crossroads: European Labour Law after Maastricht’, in R. Dehousse (ed.), Europe After Maastricht: An Ever Closer Union? (Munchen: Law Books in Europe).Google Scholar
  5. Cox, R. (1987) Production, Power and World Order (New York: Columbia Press).Google Scholar
  6. Crucible Group (1994) ‘People, Plants and Patents: The Impact of Intellectual Property on Biodiversity, Conservation, Trade and Rural Society’ (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (IDRC)).Google Scholar
  7. Daly, H. (1993) ‘The Perils of Free Trade: Economists Routinely Ignore its Hidden Costs to the Environment and Community’, Scientific American, November, pp. 50-7.Google Scholar
  8. Devlin, R. (1993) ‘Privatizations and Social Welfare’, CEPAL Review, vol. 49.Google Scholar
  9. Dillon, J. (1993) ‘Intellectual Property Rights in NAFTA: Implications for Health Care and Industrial Policy in Ontario’ (Toronto: Ecumenical Coalition for Economic Justice).Google Scholar
  10. Dominguez, E. and Hettne, B. (1994) ‘Regionalism: The Cases of Europe and North America Compared’, paper presented to 48th International Congress of Americanists, Stockholm-Uppsala.Google Scholar
  11. Feres, J.C. and León, A. (1990) ‘The Magnitude of Poverty in Latin America’, CEPAL Review, no. 41.Google Scholar
  12. Grinspun, R. (1993) ‘NAFTA and Neoconservative Transformation: The Impact on Canada and Mexico’, Review of Radical Political Economics, vol. 25(4), pp. 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grinspun, R. and Cameron M.A. (eds) (1993) The Political Economy of North American Free Trade (New York: St Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  14. Grinspun, R. and Kreklewich, R. (1994) ‘Consolidating the Neoliberal State: Free Trade as a Conditioning Framework’, Studies in Political Economy, vol. 43, pp. 33–61.Google Scholar
  15. Jary, D. and Jary, J. (1991) HarperCollins Dictionary of Sociology (New York: HarperCollins).Google Scholar
  16. Hufbauer, G.C. and Schott, J.J. (1994) Western Hemisphere Economic Integration (Washington: Institutite for International Economics).Google Scholar
  17. McDougall, C.L. (1996) Intellectual Property Rights and the Biodiversity Convention: The Impact of GATT (London: Friends of the Earth).Google Scholar
  18. Pastor, Jr., M. and Wise, C. (1994) ‘The Origins and Sustainability of Mexico’s Free Trade Policy’, International Organization, vol. 48(3), pp. 459–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Posey, D. (1990) ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Just Compensation for Indigenous Knowledge’, Anthropology Today, vol. 6(4), pp. 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raghavan, C. (1990) Recolonization: GATT, the Uruguay Round and the Third World (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
  21. Ranney, D. (1993) ‘NAFTA and the New Transnational Corporate Agenda’, Review of Radical Political Economics, vol. 25(4), pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shiva, V. (1993) ‘Biodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights’, in R. Nader et al. (eds), The Case Against Free Trade (San Francisco: Earth Island Press).Google Scholar
  23. United Nations Development Programme (1992) Human Development Report 1992 (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  24. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (1995)’ states of Disarray: The Social Effects of Globalization’, UNRISD Social Development News, no. 12, Spring/Summer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations