Skip to main content

Part of the book series: British Studies Series ((BRSS))

  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

The traditional title of ‘The English Civil War’ has lost favour among historians of late because it suggests a homogeneous conflict within one kingdom, whereas it is clear that more than one civil war was fought, more than one country was involved and that events unfolded in a quite startling and unforeseen way, with the various players competing for completely different prizes. The belated recognition by English historians of the crucial role played by both Scotland and Ireland has led to a general preference for the term ‘British Civil Wars’ or ‘Wars of the Three Kingdoms’. While one certainly must bear in mind the different course and impact of the fighting in each of the three kingdoms, the crucial point is that it was their fusing together that ignited the flames of protracted warfare. The Scottish crisis of 1637 was the opening page of the drama, whose later scenes turned heavily on the preparedness of the Scots to help either Parliament or the king. As for Ireland, its role was surely necessary to buttress the notion of a great Catholic conspiracy which so obsessed men like Pym; the rebellion there in October 1641 lit the spark that flamed up into civil war in England less than a year later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Malcolm, The King in Search of Soldiers: Charles I in 1642’, Historical Journal, 21 (1978), pp. 257–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. D. G. Wanklyn and P. Young, ‘A King in Search of Soldiers: Charles I in 1642: a Rejoinder’, Historical Journal, 24 (1981), pp. 147–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Adamson, The Baronial Context of the English Civil War’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 5th ser., 40 (1990), pp. 110ff.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Kishlansky, The Rise of the New Model Army (Cambridge, 1979), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Gentles, The New Model Army in England, Ireland and Scotland, 1645–1653 (Oxford, 1992), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Adamson, ‘The English Nobility and the Projected Settlement of 1647’, Historical Journal, 30 (1987), pp. 567–602. Cf. M. Kishlansky, ‘Saye What?’ Historical Journal, 33 (1990), pp. 917–37; 34 (1991), pp. 231–55.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Manning, 1649. The Crisis of the English Revolution (London, 1992), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. P. Kenyon, The Civil Wars of England (New York, 1988), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Hill, The Century of Revolution (1991 reprint), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Morrill (ed.), Reactions to the English Civil War, 1642–1649 (London, 1982), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Morrill, ‘The Ecology of Allegiance in the English Revolution’, Journal of British Studies, 26 (1987), pp. 45–67; Underdown’s reply, pp. 468–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Philip Edwards

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edwards, P. (2001). The British Civil Wars, 1642–51. In: The Making of the Modern English State, 1460–1660. British Studies Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-333-99383-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-333-99383-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-69836-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-333-99383-5

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics