Skip to main content

‘Home, Sweet Home’: Stratford-upon-Avon and the Making of the Royal Shakespeare Company as a National Institution

  • Chapter
Talking Shakespeare
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

Based in the town of Shakespeare’s birth, itself in the heart of England, the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) cannot avoid being cast in the role of the nation’s Pythian serpent, guardian of the Bard’s flame and anointed declarer of prophetic utterance. The RSC has welcomed and exploited this destiny but knows there is also a damaging price to pay. The Company nurses a peculiar double burden of privilege and responsibility that reflects the contradictory position it finds itself in: it is nationally subsidized, with a local, national and international audience, presenting in Britain and abroad the works of the supreme icon of national as well as international writing in ways that aim both to honour authoritatively the truths of texts that are four centuries old, and at the same time to ind meanings in them that resonate for its diverse audiences today. Like the playwright whose name the company bears, the RSC has to be both particular and general in appeal; it has to be ‘authentic’ and represent continuity, yet continually be new and embody change, if it is not to die.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Select Bibliography

  • Addenbrooke, David, The Royal Shakespeare Company: The Peter Hall Years, London, William Kimber, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauman, Sally, The Royal Shakespeare Company: A History of Ten Decades, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Colin, Other Spaces: New Theatre and the RSC, London, Eyre Methuen, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollimore, Jonathan and Sinfield, Alan (eds), Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakakis, John (ed.), Alternative Shakespeares, London, Methuen, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, Stephen, Power Play: The Life and Times of Peter Hall, London, Hodder & Stoughton, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, John (ed.), Peter Hall’s Diaries: The Story of a Dramatic Battle, London, Hamish Hamilton, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter, Making an Exhibition of Myself, London, Sinclair-Stevens, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, Terence, That Shakespearean Rag: Essays on a Critical Process, London, Methuen, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holderness, Graham (ed.), The Shakespeare Myth, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joughin, John (ed.), Shakespeare and National Culture, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, Robert, Representing Shakespeare: England, History and the RSC, Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Notes and References

  1. Peter Hall, quoted in David Addenbrooke, The Royal Shakespeare Company: The Peter Hall Years (London: William Kimber, 1974), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Illustrated Programme of the World Theatre Season, Aldwych Theatre, March 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foreword to Judith Cook, At the Sign of the Swan (London: Harrap), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Goodwin (ed.), Peter Hall’s Diaries: The Story of a Dramatic Battle (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1983), p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chairman’s Report, RSC Annual Report: 121st Report of the Council 1996/97.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Illustrated Programme of the World Theatre Season.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Quoted in Stephen Fay, Power Play: The Life and Times of Peter Hall (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1996), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodwin (ed.), Peter Hall’s Diaries, p. 222.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Times, 5 December 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Addenbrooke, The Royal Shakespeare Company, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Actor Hugh Quarshie, who played Antony in Hall’s 1995 Stratford production of Julius Caesar, used this description, quoted in Peter Holland, English Shakespeares (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 4–5. In an interview with the author of this chapter (20 March 1998, unpublished), Hall volunteered this label himself.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Addenbrooke, The Royal Shakespeare Company, p. 227; and Sally Beauman, The Royal Shakespeare Company: A History of Ten Decades (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peter Hall, Making an Exhibition of Myself (London: Sinclair-Stevens, 1993), pp. 76–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nahum Tate (1652–1715), playwright and poet whose adaptations included King Lear with a happy ending; Thomas Bowdler (1754–1825) published an expurgated ‘Family Shakespeare’, hence to ‘bowdlerize’; David Garrick (1717–79), Henry Irving (1838–1905), Donald Wolfit (1902–68) and Laurence Olivier (1907–89), leading Shakespearean actors.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quoted in The Independent, 2 February 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Deborah Cartmell Michael Scott

Copyright information

© 2001 Colin Chambers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chambers, C. (2001). ‘Home, Sweet Home’: Stratford-upon-Avon and the Making of the Royal Shakespeare Company as a National Institution. In: Cartmell, D., Scott, M. (eds) Talking Shakespeare. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-333-98574-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics