Advertisement

A New Model for a New Context?

  • Iain Burns
  • Sally Glen
Chapter
Part of the Nurse Education in Practice book series (NEP)

Abstract

A framework known as Project 2000 was established in 1986 for nursing and midwifery education and practice. Historically, views on how best to prepare nurses and midwives have reflected existing ideologies in both education and nursing, which have in turn reflected the prevailing social climate (Spouse, 1998). Project 2000’s intentions were to produce nurses and midwives better able to meet the rapidly changing healthcare needs of society. A framework was thus established that produced not just safe nurses and midwives, but nurses and midwives who were able to improve the quality of patient care and were ‘fit for purpose’ (UKCC, 1986). The question of whether student nurses and midwives are prepared to meet the demands of clinical practice at the point of registration has been debated under the heading ‘fitness for purpose’. A fundamental principle of preregistration nursing and midwifery education, since the establishment of the Project 2000 framework, is the extent to which it provides new practitioners with an appropriate foundation for practice (Luker et al., 1996). There are growing concerns about whether education programmes are equipping nurses with the necessary knowledge and skills base for accountable practice (Scott, 1997; Walsh, 1997; Runciman et al., 1998; DoH, 1999; UKCC, 1999). However, May et al. (1997), while recognising the need for a continual evaluation of the Project 2000 programmes introduced in Scotland in 1992, indicated that the profession ‘seems to be on the right track in our preparation of tomorrow’s practitioners’.

Keywords

National Health Service High Education System Advance Nurse Nurse Programme Clinical Learning Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alavi, C (1995) Introduction. In Alavi, C (ed.) Problem-based Learning in a Health Sciences Curriculum, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amos, E and White, M J (1998) Teaching Tools: Problem-based Learning, Nurse Educator, 23 (2): 11–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, C and Myrick, F (1998) Job Satisfaction in Preceptorship and its Effect on the Clinical Performance of the Preceptor, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27: 364–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beardshaw, V and Robinson R (1990) New for Old? Projects for Nursing in the 1990s, Research Report No. 8, London: King’s Fund Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Bedford, H, Phillips, T, Robinson, J and Shostak, J (1993) Assessing Competencies in Nursing and Midwifery Education, London: ENB.Google Scholar
  6. Boud, D and Feletti, G (1997) Changing Problem-based Learning. Introduction. In Boud, D and Feletti, G (eds) The Challenge of Problem-based Learning (2nd edn), London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  7. Buchan, J (1994) Nursing Shortages and Human Resource Planning, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 31 (5): 460–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavanagh, S J, Hogan, K and Ramgopal, T (1994) Student Nurse Learning Styles, Senior Nurse, 13 (7): 37–41.Google Scholar
  9. Creedy, D and Alavi, C (1997) Problem-based Learning in an Integrated Nursing Curriculum. In Boud, D and Feletti, G (eds), The Challenge of Problem-based Learning, London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  10. Department for Education and Employment (1998) The Learning Age: A Renaissance for a New Britain, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Health (1999) Making a Difference: Strengthening the Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Contribution to Health and Healthcare, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  12. Doring, A, Bramwell, A and Bingham, B (1995) Staff Comfort/Discomfort with Problem-based Learning: A Preliminary Study, Nurse Education Today, 15 (4): 263–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Elkan, R and Robinson, J (1995) Project 2000: A Review of Published Research, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22: 386–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eraut, M (1994) Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence, London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  15. Glen, S (1995) Towards a New Model of Nursing Education, Nurse Education Today, 15: 90–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Glen, S (1999) The Demise of the Apprenticeship Model. In Nicol, M and Glen, S (eds), Clinical Skills in Nursing: Return of the Practical Room?, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Heliker, D (1994) Meeting the Challenge of the Curriculum Revolution: Problem-based Learning in Nurse Education, Journal of Nursing Education, 33: 45–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hewison, A and Wildman, S (1996) The Theory-Practice Gap in Nursing: A New Dimension, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24: 754–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hickie, S (1998) Information Base on Arrangements which Support the Development of Clinical Practice in Pre-registration Nursing Programmes in Scotland, Edinburgh: NBS.Google Scholar
  20. Hilton, P (1992) Clinical Skills Laboratories: Teaching Practice Nursing, Nursing Standard, 10 (37): 44–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirst, P H (1979) Professional Studies in Initial Teacher Education: Some Conceptual Issues. In Alexander, R J and Wormald, E (eds) Professional Studies for Teaching, Guildford: Society for Research in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  22. Hislop, S, Inglis, B, Cope, P, Stoddart, B and McIntosh, C (1996) Situating Theory in Practice: Student Views of Theory and Practice in Project 2000 Nursing Programmes, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23: 171–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jowett, S, Walton, I and Payne, S (1994) Challenges and Changes in Nurse Education—Study of the Implementation of Project 2000, Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales.Google Scholar
  24. Knowles, M (1990) The Adult Learner: The Neglected Species, Houston: Gulf.Google Scholar
  25. Levin, P (1998) Divided they Surely Fall, Times Higher, 6 February, p. 28.Google Scholar
  26. Luker, K, Carlisle, C, Riley, E, Stilwell, B, Davies, C and Wilson, R (1996) Project 2000 Fitness for Purpose: Report to the Department of Health, University of Liverpool and University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  27. McIntyre, D (1980) The Contribution of Research to Quality in Teacher Education. In Hoyle, E and Megarry, J (eds) Professional Development of Teachers, World Yearbook of Education, London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  28. Margetson, D (1994) Current Educational Reform and the Significance of Problem-based Learning, Studies in Higher Education, 19 (1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. May, N, Vetch, L, McIntosh, J and Alexander, M (1997) Preparation for Practice: Evaluation of Nurse and Midwife Education in Scotland, 1992 Programmes, Final Report, Edinburgh: NBS.Google Scholar
  30. National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education, (Chairman R Dearing) (1997a) Higher Education in the Learning Society, London: NCIHE.Google Scholar
  31. National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education, (Chairman R Garrick, Scottish Committee) (1997b) Higher Education in the Learning Society: Report of the Scottish Committee, Edinburgh: NCIHE.Google Scholar
  32. Runciman P, Dewar B and Goulbourne A (1998) Employers’ Needs and the Skills of Newly Qualified Project 2000 Staff Nurses, Edinburgh: Queen Margaret College.Google Scholar
  33. Ryan, G (1993) Student Perceptions about Self-directed Learning in a Professional Course Implementing Problem-based Learning, Studies in Higher Education, 18 (1): 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sadlo, G, Waren Piper, D and Agnew, P (1994) Problem-based Learning in the Development of an Occupational Therapy Curriculum, Part 1: The Process of Problem-based Learning, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57 (2): 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schôn, D A (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Aldershot: Arena.Google Scholar
  36. Scott, G (1997) Diploma Nurses Need Extra Year to Gain Clinical Skills, Nursing Standard, 12 (1): 5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Spouse, J (1998) Learning to Nurse through Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Nurse Education Today 18: 345–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Studdy, S J, Nicol, M and Fox-Hiley, A (1994) Teaching and Learning Clinical Skills Part of Development of a Teaching Model and Schedule of Skills Development, Nurse Education Today, 14: 186–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tom, A (1980) The Reform of Teacher Education through Research: A Futile Quest, Teachers College Record, 82 (1): 15–29.Google Scholar
  40. Tornyay, R de (1990) The Curriculum Revolution, Journal of Nursing Education, 29: 292–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (1986) Project 2000: A New Preparation for Practice, London: UKCC.Google Scholar
  42. United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (1999) Fitness for Practice, London: UKCC.Google Scholar
  43. Walsh, M (1997) Accountability and Intuition: Justifying Nursing Practice, Nursing Standard, 11 (23): 39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iain Burns and Sally Glen 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iain Burns
  • Sally Glen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations