Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 550))

Abstract

The current definitions of brain death are predicated on the prognostic observation that brain dead patients would quickly die even with intensive care. But this is now shown to be untrue.1–4 Neuroremediation technologies and advances in intensive care will make it increasingly possible to keep alive the bodies of patients who would currently be classified as brain dead, and recover much of the memories and capabilities that we currently consider irrecoverable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shewmon D. Recovery from `brain death’: a neurologist’s apologia. Linacre Q 1997; 64: 31–96.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emanuel L. Reexamining death: the asymptomatic model and a bounded zone definition. Hastings Cent Rep 1995; 25 (4): 27–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Truog R. Is it Time to Abandon Brain Death? Hastings Cent Rep 1997; 27 (1): 29–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kozorovitskiy Y, Gould E. Adult Neurogenesis: A Mechanism for Brain Repair? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2003; 25 (5): 721–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hodges H, Veizovic T, Bray N, et al. Conditionally immortal neuroepithelial stem cell grafts reverse age-associated memory impairments in rats. Neuroscience 2000; 101 (4): 945–955.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arlotta P, Magavi SS, Macklis JD. Induction of adult neurogenesis: molecular manipulation of neural precursors in situ. Ann N YAcad Sci 2003; 991: 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzsimons HL, Bland RJ, During ML. Promoters and regulatory elements that improve adeno-associated virus transgene expression in the brain. Methods 2002; 28 (2): 227–236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Poulsen DJ, Harrop JS, During MJ. Gene therapy for spinal cord injury and disease. J Spinal Cord Med 2002; 25 (1): 2–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Helms Tillery SI, Taylor DM, Schwartz AB. Training in cortical control of neuroprosthetic devices improves signal extraction from small neuronal ensembles. Rev Neurosci 2003; 14 (1–2): 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, et al. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113 (6): 767–791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor DM, Tillery SI, Schwartz AB. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 2002; 296 (5574): 1817–1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mojarradi M, Binkley D, Blalock B, et al. A miniaturized neuroprosthesis suitable for implantation into the brain. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003; 11 (1): 38–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shenoy KV, Meeker D, Cao S, et al. Neural prosthetic control signals from plan activity. Neuroreport 2003; 14: 591–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Herberman E. Mind over Mater: Controlling Computers with Thoughts. ALS News [serial online] 1999; Mar 5. Available at: http://www.rideforlife.com/n_thought030899.htm. Accessed: September 1, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alataris K, Berger TW, Marmarelis VZ. A novel network for nonlinear modeling of neural systems with arbitrary point-process inputs. Neural Netw 2000; 13 (2): 255–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Miller LE. Brain-machine interfaces: computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience. Trends Neurosci 2003; 26 (6): 329–334.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alcor. 2000. Cryonics Reaching for Tomorrow [on line]. Available at:http://www.alcor.org

    Google Scholar 

  18. Safar P. Suspended animation for delayed resuscitation from prolonged cardiac arrest that is unresuscitable by standard cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2000; 11 (Suppl): N214 - N218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nanomedicine: grounds for optimism, and a call for papers. Lancet 2003;362(9385).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kurzweil R. The Coming Merging of Mind and Machine. In Sci Am. [serial online] 1999; Fall. Available at: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articlelD=0007EE6E-F71F–1C72–9B81809EC588EF21. Accessed: September 1, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Feng R, Rampon C, Tang YP, et al. Deficient neurogenesis in forebrain-specific presenilin-1 knockout mice is associated with reduced clearance of hippocampal memory traces. Neuron 2001; 32 (5): 911–926.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McMahan J. The metaphysics of brain death. Bioethics 1995; 9: 91–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Youngner S, Bartlett E. Human death and high technology: the failure of whole-brain formulations. Ann Intern Med 1983; 99: 252–258.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nash M, Park A, Wilworth J. Glimpses of the mind. Time 1995;July 17: 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chislenko E. Interview with Alexander Chislenko. Thing Reviews [serial online] 1997. Available at: http://www.old.thing.net lttreview/marrev97.03.html. Accessed: September 1, 2003.

  26. Annas GJ. The man on the moon, immortality, and other millenial myths: the prospects and perils of human genetic engineering. Emory Law J 2000; 49 (3): 753–782.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hughes, J.J. (2004). The Death of Death. In: Machado, C., Shewmon, D.A. (eds) Brain Death and Disorders of Consciousness. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 550. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48526-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48526-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0976-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48526-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics