Skip to main content

Abstract

A look at a definition of landscape in an ordinary dictionary reveals that landscape can mean both a representation of a scene (pictorial scenery) and that which might be thus represented, as when “a portion of territory that can be viewed at one time from one place” is represented in a painting of, for example, “natural inland scenery” or as “a particular area of activity: SCENE”:

Landscape is thus both a form of representation and something that is represented. This raises issues, I will argue, concerning the historical and present day character of the interrelationship between the representation and that represented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberti, L.B. (1956 [1435–36]). On Painting. London: RKP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell, J. (1972). The Idea of Landscape and the Sense of Place. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell, J. (1980). The Dark Side of the Landscape: the Rural Poor in English Painting 1730–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell, J. (1987). the Public Prospect and the Private View: the Politics of Taste in Eighteenth-Century Britain. In J.C. Eade (Ed.), Projecting Landscape (pp. 15–35). Australia: Humanities Research Centre Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1972 [1957]). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). A Theory of Play and Fantasy. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battisti, C. & Alessio, G. (1975). Dizionario Etimologico Italiano. Firenze: Instituto Di Glottologia, G. Barbèra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomley, N.K. (1994). Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. New York, Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certeau, M. de (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certeau, M. de (1990). L’invention du quotidien: Arts de faire. New Edition. Vol. I. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claval, P. (2004). the Languages of Rural Landscapes. This Volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (1984). Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (1988). the Geometry of Landscape: Practical and Speculative Arts in Sixteenth-Century Venetian Land Territories. In D. Cosgrove and S. Daniels (Eds.), The Iconography of Landscape (pp. 254–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (1993). The Palladian Landscape: Geographical Change and Its Cultural Representations in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (1998). Cultural Landscapes. In T. Unwin (Ed.), A European Geography (pp. 65–81). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (2003). Landscape: Ecology and Semiosis. In H. Palang & G. Fry (Eds.), Landscape Interfaces: Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes (pp. 15–20). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S. (1989). Marxism, Culture and the Duplicity of Landscape. In R. Peet & N. Thrift (Eds.), New Models in Geography (pp. 196–220). Vol. II. London: Unwin and Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S. (1993). Fields of Vision: Landscape Imagery and National Identity in England and the United States. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S. (1999). Humphiy Repton: Landscape Gardening and the Geography of Georgian England. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S. & Cosgrove, D. (1988). Introduction: Iconography and Landscape. In D. Cosgrove & S. Daniels (Eds.), The Iconography of Landscape (pp. 1–10), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debray, R. (1994). L’Etat séducteur: Les révolutions médiologiques du pouvoir. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1988). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, S. (1975). The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, S. (1987). From Mental Matrix to Mappa Mundi to Christian Empire: the Heritage of Ptolemaic Cartography in the Renaissance. In D. Woodward (Ed.), Art and Cartography: Six Historical Essays (pp. 10–50). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.W. (1991 [1836]). Nature. Nature/Walking. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M., (1979 [1975]). Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1998 [1973]). Dette er ikke en pibe. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzner, J. (1886–1896). Ordbog om Det Gamle Norske Sprog. Kristiania: Ny Norske forlagsforening.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamillscheg, E. (1969). Etymologisches Wörterbuch Der Französischen Sprache. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, P.B. (Ed.) (1968). Merriam-Webster. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English language, Unabridged Springfield, Mass.: G. & C. Merriam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, B.L. (1998). Values, Ideology and Power Relations in Cultural Landscape Evaluations. Bergen: Dept. of Geography, University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. & Baden, J. (1977). Managing the Commons. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1983). Introduction. In T. Ranger & E. Hobsbawm (Eds.), The Invention of Tradition (pp 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. & Daugstad, K. (1996). Cultural Landscape under Administration — a Conceptual Analysis. In M. Ihse (Ed.), Landscape Analysis in the Nordic Countries (pp. 162–188). Stockholm: FRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. & Daugstad, K. (1997). Usages of the ‘Cultural Landscape’ Concept in Norwegian and Nordic Landscape Administration. Landscape Research, 22, 3, 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain, R.J.P. & Baigent, E. (1992). The Cadastral Map in the Service of the State: A History of Property Mapping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærgaard, T. (1994). The Danish Revolution, 1500–1800: An Ecohistorical Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korzybski, A. (1948). Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Lakeville, Conn: the International Non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S.K. (1953). Feeling and Form: Theory of Art. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, A.A. (1991). Northern Natures. Fennia 169:1,

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, A.A. (1991). Northern Natures. Fennia 169:57–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, J.R. & Gross, M. (1998). Back to the Future, Back to Basics: the Social Ecology of Landscapes and the Future of Landscape Planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, 207–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCay, B.J. & Acheson, J.M. (Eds) (1987). The Question of the Commons: Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources. Tuscon: the University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mels, T. (1999). Wild Landscapes: the Cultural Nature of Swedish Natural Parks. Lund: Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mels, T. (2002). Nature, Home, and Scenery: the Official Spatialities of Swedish National Parks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20, 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster (1995). Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, MA.: Merriam-Webster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (1995). There’s no Such Thing as Culture: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Idea of Culture in Cultural Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers N.S. 20, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (1996). The Lie of the Land: Migrant Workers in the Californian Landscape. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2000). Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W.J.T. (1994). Imperial Landscape. In W.J.T. Mitchell (Ed.), Landscape and Power (pp. 5–34). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K.R. (1984). Nature’s Ideological Landscape: A Literary and Geographic Perspective on its Development and Preservation on Denmark’s Jutland Heath. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K.R. (1993). Sexual Cosmology: Nation and Landscape at the Conceptual Interstices of Nature and Culture, or: What does Landscape Really Mean? In B. Bender (Ed.), Landscape: Politics and Perspectives (pp. 307–343). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K.R. (2001a). Landscape as a Contested Topos of Place, Community and Self. In S. Hoelscher, P.C. Adams & K.E. Till (Eds.), Textures of Place: Exploring Humanist Geographies (pp. 95–117). Minneapolis: the University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K.R. (2001b). Time out of Mind — Mind out of Time: Custom vs. Tradition in Environmental Heritage Research and Interpretation. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7, 4:339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K.R. (2002a). Landscape, Nature and the Body Politic: From Britain’s Renaissance to America’s New World. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K.R. (2002b). Landscape, Place and the State of Progress. In R.D. Sack (Ed.), Progress: Geographical Essays (pp. 22–60). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O.E.D. (1971). Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, R.D. (1997). Homo Geographicus: A Framework for Action, Awareness, and Moral Concern. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setten, G. (2004). the Habitus, the Rule and the Moral Landscape. Cultural Geographies, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirn, A.W. (1998). The Language of Landscape. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, O. (1996). Paper Cities: Visual Thinking in Urban Planning. Ecumene, 33, 249–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P. (1993). Customs in Common. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1975). Images and Mental Maps. Annals, Association of American Geographers 65, 2, 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1979). Sight and Pictures. Geographical Review, 69, 4, 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1973). The Country and the City. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olwig, K.R. (2004). “This is not a Landscape”: Circulating Reference and Land Shaping. In: Palang, H., Sooväli, H., Antrop, M., Setten, G. (eds) European Rural Landscapes: Persistence and Change in a Globalising Environment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48512-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48512-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6585-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48512-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics