Skip to main content

Black’s Single-Peakedness Condition

  • Chapter

Abstract

Like Kekulé’s vision about the ring structure of the carbon molecule, the notion of single-peaked preferences came to Duncan Black as a sudden flash of insight. In the 1940s, Black had independently rediscovered the concept of cyclical preferences and was looking for a way to avoid majority rule cycles (Black, 1958). In single-peakedness he found one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrow, K. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values, Second Edition. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. and Newing, R.A. (1951). Committee Decisions with Complementary Valuation. Edinburgh: William Hodge and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. (1964). A Theory of Data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1957). Political Parties. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S.L. and Grofman, B. (1988). “Ideological consistency as a collective phenomenon.” American Political Science Review, 82(3): 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B. (1993). “Toward an institution-rich theory of political competition with a supply side component,” in B. Grofman (ed.) Information, Participation and Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B. and Brazill, T. (1953–1991). “Identifying the median justice on the supreme court through multidimensional scaling: analysis of ‘natural courts’.” Public Choice (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Regenwetter, M., Adams, J., and Grofman, B. “On the condorcet efficiency of majority rule: an alternative view of majority cycles and social homogeneity.” Theory and Decision (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Regenwetter, M., Marley, A.A.J., and Grofman, B. “General concept of value restriction and preference majority.” Social Choice and Welfare (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya (1970). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. New York: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, Rein and Bernard Grofman (1985). “Rethinking Duverger’s law: predicting the effective number of parties in plurality and PR systems — parties minus issues equals one.” European Journal of Political Research, 13: 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grofman, B. (2004). Black’s Single-Peakedness Condition. In: Rowley, C.K., Schneider, F. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8607-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47828-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics