Abstract
This chapter concerns principles regarding when and how to use judgment in time-series forecasting with domain knowledge. The evidence suggests that the reliability of domain knowledge is critical, and that judgment is essential when dealing with “soft” information. However judgment suffers from biases and inefficiencies when dealing with domain knowledge. We suggest two sets of principles for dealing with domain knowledge—when to use it and how to use it. Domain knowledge should be used when there is a large amount of relevant information, when experts are deemed to possess it, and when the experts do not appear to have predetermined agendas for the final forecast or the forecast setting process. Forecasters should select only the most important causal information, adjust initial estimates boldly in the light of new domain knowledge, and use decomposition strategies to integrate domain knowledge into the forecast.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adam, E. E. R. J. Ebert (1976), “A comparison of human and statistical forecasting,” AIIE Transactions, 8, 120–127.
Adelman, L. (1981), “The influence of formal, substantive, and contextual task properties on the relative effectiveness of different forms of feedback in multiple cue probability learning tasks,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 27, 423–442.
Armstrong, J. S. (1983), “Relative accuracy of judgmental and extrapolative methods in forecasting annual earnings,” Journal of Forecasting, 2, 437–447. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast
Armstrong, J. S. (1985), Long Range Forecasting: From Crystal Ball to Computer,2nd ed., NY: Wiley. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast
Armstrong, J. S., M. Adya F. Collopy (2001), “Rule-based forecasting: Using judgment in time-series extrapolation,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.) Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Armstrong, J. S. F. Collopy (1998), “Integration of statistical methods and judgment for time-series forecasting: Principles from empirical research,” in G.Wright P. Goodwin (eds.), Forecasting with Judgement, Wiley, pp. 269–293. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast
Brehmer, B. J. Kuylenstiema (1980), “Content and consistency in probabilistic inference tasks,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 26, 54–64.
Brown, L. D., R. L. Hagerman, P. A. Griffin M. E. Zmijewski (1987), “Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time-series models in forecasting quarterly earnings,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9, 61–87.
Bunn, D. G. Wright (1991), “Interaction of judgemental and statistical forecasting methods: Issues and analysis,” Management Science, 37, 501–518.
Carbone, R. W. Gorr (1985), “Accuracy of judgmental forecasting of time-series,” Decision Sciences, 16, 153–160.
Collopy, F. J. S. Armstrong (1992), “Expert opinions about extrapolations and the mystery of the overlooked discontinuities,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 575–582. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast
Dalrymple, D. (1987), “Sales forecasting practices: Results from a United States survey,” International Journal of Forecasting, 3, 379–391.
Davis, F. D., G. Lohse J. E. Kotterman (1994), “Harmful effects of seemingly helpful information on forecasts of stock earnings,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 15, 253–267.
Edmundson, R. H. (1990), “Decomposition: A strategy for judgemental forecasting,” Journal of Forecasting, 9, 301–314.
Edmundson, R. H., M. J. Lawrence M. J. O’Connor (1988), “The use of non time-series information in sales forecasting: A case study,” Journal of Forecasting, 7, 201–211.
Gorr, W.L. (1986), “Special event data in shared databases,” MIS Quarterly, 10, September, 239–255.
Handzic, M. (1997), The utilization of contextual information in a judgemental decision making task. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of New South Wales,“ available from m.handzic @unsw.edu.au
Hopwood, W. S. J. C. McKeown (1990), “Evidence on surrogates for earnings expectations within a capital market context,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 5, 339–368.
Johnson, E. (1988), “Expertise and decision making under uncertainty: performance and process,” in M. Chi, R. Glaser M. Farr (eds.), The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NY: L.Erlbaum Assoc.
Kardes, F. (1996), “In defense of experimental consumer psychology,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5, 279–296.
Koele, P. (1980), “The influence of labeled stimuli on nonlinear multiple cue probability learning,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 26, 22–31.
Kurke, L. H. Aldrich (1983), “Mintzberg was right! A replication and extension of The Nature of Managerial Work, ” Management Science, 32, 683–695.
Lawrence, M. J., R. H. Edmundson M. J. O’Connor (1985), “An examination of the accuracy of judgemental extrapolation of time-series,” International Journal of Forecasting, 1, 25–35.
Lawrence, M. J. M. J. O’Connor (1992), “Exploring judgemental forecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 15–26.
Lawrence, M. J. M. J. O’Connor (1996), “Judgement or models: The importance of task differences,” 24, 245–254.
Lawrence, M. J., M. J. O’Connor R. H. Edmundson (2000), “A field study of sales forecasting accuracy and processes,” European Journal of Operational Research, 122, 151–160.
Lim, J. S. M. J. O’Connor (1996), “Judgemental forecasting with time series and causal information,” International Journal of Forecasting, 12, 139–153.
MacGregor, D. (2001), “Decomposition for judgemental forecasting and estimation,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.) Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Makridakis, S. (1988), “Metaforecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting, 4, 467–491.
Miller, P. M. (1971), “Do labels mislead?: A multiple cue study, within the framework of Brunswik’s probabilistic functionalism,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 6, 480–500.
Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper Row.
Muchinsky, P.M. A. Dudycha (1975), “Human inference behavior in abstract and meaningful environments,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 13, 377–391.
O’Connor, M. J., W. Remus K. Griggs (1993), “Judgemental forecasting in times of change,” International Journal of Forecasting, 9, 163–172.
O’Connor, M. J., W. Remus K. Griggs (1997), “Going up—going down: How good are people at forecasting trends and changes in trends?” Journal of Forecasting, 16, 165–176.
Payne, J. (1982), “Contingent decision behaviour,” Psychological Bulletin, 92, 382–402. Sanders, N. (1992), “Accuracy of judgmental forecasts: A comparison,” Omega, 20, 353–364.
Sanders, N. R. K. Manrodt (1994), “Forecasting practices in U.S. corporations: Survey results,” Interfaces, 24, 92–100.
Sanders, N. L. Ritzman (1992), “The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 39–52.
Sanders, N. L. Ritzman (2001), “Judgemental adjustment of statistical forecasts,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.) Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sniezek, J. A. (1986), “The role of variable labels in cue probability learning tasks,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 141–161.
Webby, R. G. (1994), Graphical Support for the Integration of Event Information into Time-series Forecasting: An Empirical Investigation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of New South Wales.
Webby, R. G. M. J. O’Connor (1996), “Judgemental versus statistical time-series forecasting: A review of the literature,” International Journal of Forecasting, 12, 91–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Webby, R., O’Connor, M., Lawrence, M. (2001). Judgmental Time-Series Forecasting Using Domain Knowledge. In: Armstrong, J.S. (eds) Principles of Forecasting. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7401-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47630-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive