Skip to main content

Judgmental Time-Series Forecasting Using Domain Knowledge

  • Chapter
Principles of Forecasting

Abstract

This chapter concerns principles regarding when and how to use judgment in time-series forecasting with domain knowledge. The evidence suggests that the reliability of domain knowledge is critical, and that judgment is essential when dealing with “soft” information. However judgment suffers from biases and inefficiencies when dealing with domain knowledge. We suggest two sets of principles for dealing with domain knowledge—when to use it and how to use it. Domain knowledge should be used when there is a large amount of relevant information, when experts are deemed to possess it, and when the experts do not appear to have predetermined agendas for the final forecast or the forecast setting process. Forecasters should select only the most important causal information, adjust initial estimates boldly in the light of new domain knowledge, and use decomposition strategies to integrate domain knowledge into the forecast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adam, E. E. R. J. Ebert (1976), “A comparison of human and statistical forecasting,” AIIE Transactions, 8, 120–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, L. (1981), “The influence of formal, substantive, and contextual task properties on the relative effectiveness of different forms of feedback in multiple cue probability learning tasks,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 27, 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. (1983), “Relative accuracy of judgmental and extrapolative methods in forecasting annual earnings,” Journal of Forecasting, 2, 437–447. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. (1985), Long Range Forecasting: From Crystal Ball to Computer,2nd ed., NY: Wiley. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., M. Adya F. Collopy (2001), “Rule-based forecasting: Using judgment in time-series extrapolation,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.) Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. F. Collopy (1998), “Integration of statistical methods and judgment for time-series forecasting: Principles from empirical research,” in G.Wright P. Goodwin (eds.), Forecasting with Judgement, Wiley, pp. 269–293. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, B. J. Kuylenstiema (1980), “Content and consistency in probabilistic inference tasks,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 26, 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., R. L. Hagerman, P. A. Griffin M. E. Zmijewski (1987), “Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time-series models in forecasting quarterly earnings,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9, 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, D. G. Wright (1991), “Interaction of judgemental and statistical forecasting methods: Issues and analysis,” Management Science, 37, 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, R. W. Gorr (1985), “Accuracy of judgmental forecasting of time-series,” Decision Sciences, 16, 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collopy, F. J. S. Armstrong (1992), “Expert opinions about extrapolations and the mystery of the overlooked discontinuities,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 575–582. Full text at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, D. (1987), “Sales forecasting practices: Results from a United States survey,” International Journal of Forecasting, 3, 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., G. Lohse J. E. Kotterman (1994), “Harmful effects of seemingly helpful information on forecasts of stock earnings,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 15, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson, R. H. (1990), “Decomposition: A strategy for judgemental forecasting,” Journal of Forecasting, 9, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson, R. H., M. J. Lawrence M. J. O’Connor (1988), “The use of non time-series information in sales forecasting: A case study,” Journal of Forecasting, 7, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorr, W.L. (1986), “Special event data in shared databases,” MIS Quarterly, 10, September, 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handzic, M. (1997), The utilization of contextual information in a judgemental decision making task. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of New South Wales,“ available from m.handzic @unsw.edu.au

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, W. S. J. C. McKeown (1990), “Evidence on surrogates for earnings expectations within a capital market context,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 5, 339–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. (1988), “Expertise and decision making under uncertainty: performance and process,” in M. Chi, R. Glaser M. Farr (eds.), The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NY: L.Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardes, F. (1996), “In defense of experimental consumer psychology,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5, 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koele, P. (1980), “The influence of labeled stimuli on nonlinear multiple cue probability learning,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 26, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurke, L. H. Aldrich (1983), “Mintzberg was right! A replication and extension of The Nature of Managerial Work, ” Management Science, 32, 683–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. J., R. H. Edmundson M. J. O’Connor (1985), “An examination of the accuracy of judgemental extrapolation of time-series,” International Journal of Forecasting, 1, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. J. M. J. O’Connor (1992), “Exploring judgemental forecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. J. M. J. O’Connor (1996), “Judgement or models: The importance of task differences,” 24, 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, M. J., M. J. O’Connor R. H. Edmundson (2000), “A field study of sales forecasting accuracy and processes,” European Journal of Operational Research, 122, 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J. S. M. J. O’Connor (1996), “Judgemental forecasting with time series and causal information,” International Journal of Forecasting, 12, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, D. (2001), “Decomposition for judgemental forecasting and estimation,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.) Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis, S. (1988), “Metaforecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting, 4, 467–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. M. (1971), “Do labels mislead?: A multiple cue study, within the framework of Brunswik’s probabilistic functionalism,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 6, 480–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchinsky, P.M. A. Dudycha (1975), “Human inference behavior in abstract and meaningful environments,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 13, 377–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. J., W. Remus K. Griggs (1993), “Judgemental forecasting in times of change,” International Journal of Forecasting, 9, 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. J., W. Remus K. Griggs (1997), “Going up—going down: How good are people at forecasting trends and changes in trends?” Journal of Forecasting, 16, 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. (1982), “Contingent decision behaviour,” Psychological Bulletin, 92, 382–402. Sanders, N. (1992), “Accuracy of judgmental forecasts: A comparison,” Omega, 20, 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N. R. K. Manrodt (1994), “Forecasting practices in U.S. corporations: Survey results,” Interfaces, 24, 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N. L. Ritzman (1992), “The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N. L. Ritzman (2001), “Judgemental adjustment of statistical forecasts,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.) Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniezek, J. A. (1986), “The role of variable labels in cue probability learning tasks,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webby, R. G. (1994), Graphical Support for the Integration of Event Information into Time-series Forecasting: An Empirical Investigation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webby, R. G. M. J. O’Connor (1996), “Judgemental versus statistical time-series forecasting: A review of the literature,” International Journal of Forecasting, 12, 91–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Webby, R., O’Connor, M., Lawrence, M. (2001). Judgmental Time-Series Forecasting Using Domain Knowledge. In: Armstrong, J.S. (eds) Principles of Forecasting. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7401-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47630-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics