Abstract
On the eve of the Famine the Irish population was one of the most politicized in Europe, largely due to the activities of Daniel O’Connell, a Catholic barrister and MP who had dominated Irish politics since the 1820s.1 Involvement in the parliamentary process, however, was recent and small scale. Catholics had only gained the right to vote in 1793, but continued to be barred from sitting in parliament. O’Connell’s role in securing Catholic Emancipation in 1829, which gave Catholics throughout the United Kingdom the right to sit in Westminster, marked a significant victory against the British government. But the achievement of Emancipation was counterbalanced by a simultaneous reduction in the Irish franchise. As a consequence of the Emancipation Act, the county franchise in Ireland was raised from 40 shillings to ten pounds for freeholders, thereby disenfranchising many of O’Connell’s supporters. The size of the electorate continued to decrease after the Reform Act of 1832, despite the rapid growth in population. This was partly due to the reluctance of landlords to grant long leases, hoping to maximize their income through shorter-term lettings. By the 1840s, less than one in every 116 county dwellers had the vote, compared with one in 24 in England.2
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
There are many publications on Daniel O’Connell: Oliver MacDonagh, The Hereditary Bondsman: Daniel O’Connell 1775–1829 (London, 1988)
Oliver MacDonagh, The Emancipist: Daniel O’Connell 1830–47 (London, 1989).
K. Theodore Hoppen, ‘Politics, the law, and the nature of the Irish electorate 1832–1850’, in English Historical Review, xcii (1977), p. 751.
K. Theodore Hoppen, Elections, Politics and Society in Ireland 1832–1885 (Oxford, 1984), pp. 16–7.
Brigitte Anton, ‘Women of the Nation’, in History Ireland (1993, Autumn), pp. 34–7.
Charles Gavan Duffy, Four Years of Irish History, 1845–9 (Dublin, 1887).
David N. Buckley, James Fintan Lalor: Radical (Cork, 1990).
Kevin B. Nowlan, The Politics of Repeal: A Study of Relations between Great Britain and Ireland, 1841–50 (London, 1965).
John Prest, Lord John Russell (London, 1972), p. 263.
Wayne Hall, ‘A Tory Periodical in a Time of Famine’, in Arthur Gribben (ed.), The Great Famine and the Irish Diaspora in America (Massachusetts, 1999), pp. 48–65.
Richard Davis, Revolutionary Imperialist: William Smith O’Brien (Dublin, 1998), p. 251.
Clarendon to Russell, 30 March 1848, cited in G. P. Gooch (ed.), The Later Correspondence of Lord John Russell 1840–78 (London, 1925), p. 221.
T. F. O’Sullivan, The Young Irelanders (Tralee, 1944), pp. 78–9.
Dorothy Thompson, ‘Ireland and the Irish in English Radicalism before 1850’, in James Epstein and Dorothy Thompson (eds), The Chartist Experience (Macmillan–now Palgrave, 1985), pp. 139–46.
Charles Gavan Duffy, Four Years of Irish History (London, 1883), p. 641.
Antony M. Breen, ‘Cappoquin and the 1849 Movement’, in History Ireland, 7:2 (1999 Summer), pp. 31–3.
Allan Todd, Revolutions 1789–1917 (Cambridge, 1998), pp. 61–3.
Copyright information
© 2002 Christine Kinealy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kinealy, C. (2002). Repeal, Relief and Rebellion. In: The Great Irish Famine. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80247-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80247-6_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-67773-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80247-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)