Abstract
Is Marianne Dashwood pregnant? Is the ‘putrid fever’ (SS, 330) which threatens her life and robs her of her looks in Volume 3 of Sense and Sensibility, and which is itself a consequence of her disastrous romantic encounter with the rakish Willoughby, a decorous euphemism? At the heart of the novel there lies not, as Tony Tanner once suggested, ‘a muffled scream from Marianne’, but a hidden narrative, barely touched upon but of enormous resonance (Marianne Dashwood’s scream, ‘muffled’ by biting her handkerchief, is, it is true, a part of this resonating effect, but it is a symptom, not the thing itself).1 This is the story of Eliza Williams, Colonel Brandon’s niece, and her mother Eliza Brandon, his sister-in-law. Brandon’s tale is, in Barbara K. Seeber’s words, one of Austen’s ‘narrative cameos’, which
all speak of sexual and financial exploitation that the main narrative tries to elide. Yet this subversive content cannot be contained. The stories spill over into the main narrative, disturbing the peace of the narrative that has been privileged by traditional criticism. They talk back to the central plot and reveal its inability to accommodate their stories; in this way, Austen reveals ideology as a constructed ‘truth’…. The narrative cameos challenge some common assumptions about Austen. The novels are narrow in their social milieu; yet the cameos deal with illegitimate children, fallen women, and abject poverty. Austen is conservative, for she reconciles the desire of the individual with the structure of society; the cameos show just the opposite: individuals for whom the social order has failed. The cameos provide a countercurrent to the main narrative.2
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Tony Tanner, Jane Austen (Basingstoke: Macmillan–now Palgrave Macmillan, 1986), p. 75.
Barbara K. Seeber, General Consent in Jane Austen: A Study in Dialogism (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2000), pp. 15, 68.
A. Walton Litz, Jane Austen: A Study of Her Artistic Development (London: Chatto and Windus, 1965), p. 72.
D. W. Harding, ‘Character and Caricature in Jane Austen’, in B. C. Southam (ed.), Critical Essays on Jane Austen (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968), p. 102.
Marvin Mudrick, Jane Austen: Irony as Defense and Discovery (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1952), p. 93;
Andrew H. Wright, Jane Austen’s Novels: A Study in Structure (London: Chatto and Windus, 1961), p. 95.
Louis Menand, ‘What Jane Austen Doesn’t Tell Us’, New York Review of Books, 1 February 1996, 13–15.
Cheryl L. Nixon, ‘Balancing the Courtship Hero: Masculine Emotional Display in Film Adaptations of Austen’s Novels’, in Linda Troost and Sayre Greenfield (eds), Jane Austen in Hollywood (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1998), pp. 39–41.
B. C. Southam, Jane Austen’s Literary Manuscripts (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964), pp. 55–7.
Marilyn Butler, Jane Austen and the War of Ideas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975), pp. 182–3.
Eliza Fenwick, Secresy; or, The Ruin on the Rock, ed. Janet Todd (London: Pandora, 1989), pp. 15, 223.
Maria Edgeworth, ‘Letters of Julia and Caroline’, in Letters for Literary Ladies, ed. Claire Connolly (London: Dent, 1993), pp. 40–1.
David Nokes, Jane Austen: A Life (London: Fourth Estate, 1997), p. 31.
Janet Todd, Sensibility: An Introduction (London and New York: Methuen, 1986), p. 129.
G. J. Barker-Benfield, The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 1992), pp. xvii, 220.
David Lodge, The Language of Fiction (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966), p. 94.
Jan S. Fergus, Jane Austen and the Didactic Novel: ‘Northanger Abbey’, ‘Sense and Sensibility’, and ‘Pride and Prejudice’ (Basingstoke: Macmillan–now Palgrave Macmillan, 1983), p. 42.
Claudia L. Johnson, Jane Austen: Women, Politics and the Novel (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1988), p. 55.
Andrew Wilton, The Swagger Portrait: Grand Manner Portraiture in Britain from Van Dyck to Augustus John 1630–1930 (London: Tate Gallery, 1992), p. 17.
Frances Burney, Evelina, ed. Stewart J. Cooke (New York: Norton, 1998), p. 317
Mary Shelley, ‘Mathilda’, in The Mary Shelley Reader, ed. Betty T. Bennett and Charles E. Robinson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 179.
Mary Poovey, The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1984), p. 192.
Susan Griffin, Pornography and Silence (London: The Women’s Press, 1981), pp. 20–1.
Toril Moi, ‘Feminist Literary Criticism’, in Ann Jefferson and David Rovey (eds), Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction (London: Batsford, 1986), p. 213.
Julia Kristeva, ‘On Chinese Women’, in The Kristeva Reader, ed. Toril Moi (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), pp. 141, 145–6.
Ernest Jones, On The Nightmare (London: Hogarth Press/Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1949), p. 125.
Matthew Lewis, The Monk, ed. Howard Anderson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 385.
Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary and the Wrongs of Women, ed. Gary Kelly (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976), pp. 157–8.
Jane West, A Gossip’s Story, and a Legendary Tale (London: T. N. Longman, 1798), 2 vols [3rd edn], 1: 205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Darryl Jones
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, D. (2004). Sense and Sensibility. In: Jane Austen. Critical Issues. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80244-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80244-5_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-72744-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80244-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)