Skip to main content

Sense and Sensibility

  • Chapter
Jane Austen

Part of the book series: Critical Issues ((CRTI))

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Is Marianne Dashwood pregnant? Is the ‘putrid fever’ (SS, 330) which threatens her life and robs her of her looks in Volume 3 of Sense and Sensibility, and which is itself a consequence of her disastrous romantic encounter with the rakish Willoughby, a decorous euphemism? At the heart of the novel there lies not, as Tony Tanner once suggested, ‘a muffled scream from Marianne’, but a hidden narrative, barely touched upon but of enormous resonance (Marianne Dashwood’s scream, ‘muffled’ by biting her handkerchief, is, it is true, a part of this resonating effect, but it is a symptom, not the thing itself).1 This is the story of Eliza Williams, Colonel Brandon’s niece, and her mother Eliza Brandon, his sister-in-law. Brandon’s tale is, in Barbara K. Seeber’s words, one of Austen’s ‘narrative cameos’, which

all speak of sexual and financial exploitation that the main narrative tries to elide. Yet this subversive content cannot be contained. The stories spill over into the main narrative, disturbing the peace of the narrative that has been privileged by traditional criticism. They talk back to the central plot and reveal its inability to accommodate their stories; in this way, Austen reveals ideology as a constructed ‘truth’…. The narrative cameos challenge some common assumptions about Austen. The novels are narrow in their social milieu; yet the cameos deal with illegitimate children, fallen women, and abject poverty. Austen is conservative, for she reconciles the desire of the individual with the structure of society; the cameos show just the opposite: individuals for whom the social order has failed. The cameos provide a countercurrent to the main narrative.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Tony Tanner, Jane Austen (Basingstoke: Macmillan–now Palgrave Macmillan, 1986), p. 75.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbara K. Seeber, General Consent in Jane Austen: A Study in Dialogism (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2000), pp. 15, 68.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Walton Litz, Jane Austen: A Study of Her Artistic Development (London: Chatto and Windus, 1965), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. W. Harding, ‘Character and Caricature in Jane Austen’, in B. C. Southam (ed.), Critical Essays on Jane Austen (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marvin Mudrick, Jane Austen: Irony as Defense and Discovery (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1952), p. 93;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrew H. Wright, Jane Austen’s Novels: A Study in Structure (London: Chatto and Windus, 1961), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Louis Menand, ‘What Jane Austen Doesn’t Tell Us’, New York Review of Books, 1 February 1996, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheryl L. Nixon, ‘Balancing the Courtship Hero: Masculine Emotional Display in Film Adaptations of Austen’s Novels’, in Linda Troost and Sayre Greenfield (eds), Jane Austen in Hollywood (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1998), pp. 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. C. Southam, Jane Austen’s Literary Manuscripts (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964), pp. 55–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marilyn Butler, Jane Austen and the War of Ideas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975), pp. 182–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eliza Fenwick, Secresy; or, The Ruin on the Rock, ed. Janet Todd (London: Pandora, 1989), pp. 15, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maria Edgeworth, ‘Letters of Julia and Caroline’, in Letters for Literary Ladies, ed. Claire Connolly (London: Dent, 1993), pp. 40–1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. David Nokes, Jane Austen: A Life (London: Fourth Estate, 1997), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Janet Todd, Sensibility: An Introduction (London and New York: Methuen, 1986), p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. J. Barker-Benfield, The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 1992), pp. xvii, 220.

    Google Scholar 

  16. David Lodge, The Language of Fiction (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jan S. Fergus, Jane Austen and the Didactic Novel: ‘Northanger Abbey’, ‘Sense and Sensibility’, and ‘Pride and Prejudice’ (Basingstoke: Macmillan–now Palgrave Macmillan, 1983), p. 42.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Claudia L. Johnson, Jane Austen: Women, Politics and the Novel (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1988), p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Andrew Wilton, The Swagger Portrait: Grand Manner Portraiture in Britain from Van Dyck to Augustus John 1630–1930 (London: Tate Gallery, 1992), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frances Burney, Evelina, ed. Stewart J. Cooke (New York: Norton, 1998), p. 317

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mary Shelley, ‘Mathilda’, in The Mary Shelley Reader, ed. Betty T. Bennett and Charles E. Robinson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mary Poovey, The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1984), p. 192.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Susan Griffin, Pornography and Silence (London: The Women’s Press, 1981), pp. 20–1.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Toril Moi, ‘Feminist Literary Criticism’, in Ann Jefferson and David Rovey (eds), Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction (London: Batsford, 1986), p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Julia Kristeva, ‘On Chinese Women’, in The Kristeva Reader, ed. Toril Moi (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), pp. 141, 145–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ernest Jones, On The Nightmare (London: Hogarth Press/Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1949), p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Matthew Lewis, The Monk, ed. Howard Anderson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 385.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary and the Wrongs of Women, ed. Gary Kelly (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976), pp. 157–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jane West, A Gossip’s Story, and a Legendary Tale (London: T. N. Longman, 1798), 2 vols [3rd edn], 1: 205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Darryl Jones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, D. (2004). Sense and Sensibility. In: Jane Austen. Critical Issues. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80244-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics