Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter looks at the way in which the changing social policy environment in the UK has been accompanied by increasingly stringent measures to regulate the activities of voluntary organisations in order to minimise the risks inherent in using private bodies, rather than the institutions of the state, to meet social need. It examines the impact of regulation, registration and inspection on the activities and organisation of the many thousands of small local organisations which make up the great majority of the population of the voluntary and community sectors.1 And it shows how the burdensome nature of risk-minimisation measures can be at odds with the encouragement of voluntary action and community involvement which has been a social policy goal for successive administrations and which is an important component of the Blair government’s ‘Third Way’ project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Better Regulation Task Force (1998a) Principles of Good Regulation, Better Regulation Task Force, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Better Regulation Task Force (1998b) Review: Consumer Affairs, Central Office of Information, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billis, D. and M. Harris (1992) ‘Taking the strain of change: UK local voluntary agencies enter the post-Thatcher period’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21 (3): 211–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1999) Speech to the NCVO Conference on the Third Sector, Third Way, 21 January 1999, 10 Downing Street Press Notice, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office (1997) News Release: New Better Regulation Task Force Launched, Cab 85/97, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charities and Voluntary Organisations Task Force (1994) Proposals for Reform: Deregulation Report with an introduction by Tessa Baring–Volume 2: Full Report, Charities and Voluntary Organisations Task Force, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis Smith, J. (1996) ‘Should volunteers be managed?’, in D. Billis and M. Harris (eds) Voluntary Agencies: Challenges of Organisation and Management, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsdon, K. (1995) Voluntary Organisations: Citizenship, Learning and Change, NIACE, Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Framjee, P. (1998) ‘Charity financial reporting, fiscal matters and governance’, in D. Grimwood-Jones and S. Simmons (eds) Information Management in the Voluntary Sector, ASLIB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, H. (1986) Developing Local Voluntary Action, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, R. and C. Jarvis (1997) ‘Trends in volunteering and implications for the future’, in C. Pharoah (ed.) Dimensions of the Voluntary Sector, 1997 edition, Charities Aid Foundation, West Malling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, R. and J. Davis Smith (1992) Volunteering and Society: Principles and Practice, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1992) The Individual and the Community: The Role of the Voluntary Sector, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. (1994) Defining Deregulation, Community Matters, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermyn, H., C. Haggett, S. Woodburn and T.F. Marshall (1997a) Creswell, Whitwell and Clowne, Derbyshire, LOVAS Area Report 5, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermyn, H., C. Haggett, S. Woodburn and T.F. Marshall (1997b) Accrington, Lancashire, LOVAS Area Report 1, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. (1996) ‘Accountability: what is it and do we need it?’, in S. Osborne (ed.) Managing in the Voluntary Sector, International Thomson Business Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour Party (1997) Building the Future Together: Labour’s Policies for Partnership between Government and the Voluntary Sector, Labour Party, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Make a Difference Team (1995) Make A Difference: An Outline Volunteering Strategy for the UK, Make A Difference Team, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriott, P. (1997) Forgotten Resources? The Role of Community Buildings in Strengthening Local Communities, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T.F. (1997) Research Manual, LOVAS Paper 3, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T.F. and C. Haggett (1997) Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, LOVAS Area Report 9, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. (1998) ‘Playing with a double-edged sword; a study of the effects of statutory influence on voluntary sector after-school clubs’, MSc dissertation, Centre for Voluntary Organisation, London School of Economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochester, C. (1992) ‘Community organisations and voluntary action’, in R. Hedley and J. Davis Smith (eds) Volunteering and Society: Principles and Practice, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochester, C. (1999) Juggling on a Unicycle: A Handbook for Small Voluntary Agencies, Centre for Voluntary Organisation, London School of Economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenden Committee (1978) The Future of Voluntary Organisations, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn, S., C. Haggett, H. Jermyn and T.F. Marshall (1997) Billericay, Essex, LOVAS Area Report 4, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Colin Rochester

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rochester, C. (2001). Regulation: The Impact on Local Voluntary Action. In: Harris, M., Rochester, C. (eds) Voluntary Organisations and Social Policy in Britain. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80224-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics