Skip to main content

Abstract

Until the election of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government in 1979, the idea of ‘user involvement’ in voluntary organisations was largely rooted in notions of democratic participation. The new government shifted the focus to ideas of consumer preference and demands (Deakin, 1996), fuelled by New Right notions of dismantling the state and enhancing individual freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnes, M. and A. Walker (1996) ‘Consumerism versus empowerment: a principled approach to the involvement of older service users’, Policy and Politics, 24 (4): 375–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, P. and S. Croft (1993) Citizen Involvement: A Practical Guide for Change, Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CAG Consultants (1996) A Guide to User Feedback Methods, London Boroughs Grants Committee, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. and M. Oliver (1996) Disability Politics: Understanding our Past, Changing our Future, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coote, A. (ed.) (1992) The Welfare of Citizens: Developing New Social Rights, Institute of Public Policy Research/Rivers Oram Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, N. (1996) ‘What does contracting do to users?’, in D. Billis and M. Harris (eds) Voluntary Agencies: Challenges of Organisation and Management, Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, R. and D. Owens (1992) ‘Consumer involvement and the voluntary sector in Wales: breakthrough or bandwagon’, Critical Social Policy, 33: 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, S. and L. Martell (1998) New Labour: Politics After Thatcherism, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1993) The Spirit of Community: The Reinvention of American Society, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss, S. and C. Miller (1995) From Margin to Mainstream: Developing User- and Carer-centred Community Care, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. (1988) Community Care: Agenda for Action, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, I. (1998) ‘This time, there is an alternative’, New Statesman, 11 September: 30–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrow, J. and P. Palmer (1998) ‘Reassessing charity trusteeship in Britain? towards Conservatism, not change’, Voluntas, 9 (2): 171–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasler, F. (1997) In the Right Hands: Changing Control and Culture in a Disability Organisation, VOLPROF, The City University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1998) Compact: Getting Right Together, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, S. and M. Locke (1997) ‘Governance in the voluntary sector and the reciprocal relationship in the governance of localities’, proceedings of the 3rd ‘Researching the Voluntary Sector’ conference, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, S. and M. Locke (1998) ‘Trusting in trust’, proceedings of the 4th ‘Researching the Voluntary Sector’ conference, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, S. and M. Locke (1999) ‘Volunteering for Blair: the Third Way’, Voluntary Action, 1 (2): 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, B. (1993) Voluntary Action, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. (1997) Accountability Relationships between Voluntary Sector ‘Providers’, Local Government ‘Purchasers’ and Service Users in the Contracting State, York Publishing Services, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. (1997) ‘Knights, knaves or pawns? Human behaviour and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 26 (2): 149–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. and W. Bartlett (1993) Quasi-Markets and Social Policy, Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. and H. Glennerster (1996) Implementing the New Community Care, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindow V. (1994) Self-Help Alternatives to Mental Health Services, MIND, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindow, V. and J. Morris (1995) Service User Involvement: Synthesis of Findings and Experience in the Field of Community Care, York Publishing Services, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, A. (1998) ‘This way to the active community’, New Statesman, 20 February 1998: 20–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mocroft, I. and C. Thomason, (1993) ‘The evolution of community care and voluntary organisations’, in S. Saxon-Harrold and J. Kendall (eds) Researching the Voluntary Sector: A National, Local and International Perspective, Charities Aid Foundation, Tonbridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monach, J. and L. Spriggs (1994) ‘The consumer role’, in N. Malin (ed.) Implementing Community Care, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (1994) The Shape of Things to Come: User-Led Social Services, National Institute for Social Work, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1996) ‘User involvement in the voluntary sector–a view from the disability movement’, in Commission on the Future of the Voluntary Sector, Meeting the Challenge of Change: Voluntary Action into the 21st Century: Summary of Evidence and Selected Papers, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1994) The Myth of the Framework, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. and J. Wallcraft (1992) Guidelines for Empowering Users of Mental Health Services, COHSE/MIND, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, P. (1996) ‘Who owns voluntary organizations?’, proceedings of the 2nd ‘Researching the Voluntary Sector’ conference, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, P. and M. Locke (1997) ‘Accountability and user involvement’, in P. Palmer and E. Hoe (eds) Voluntary Matters: Management and Good Practice in the Voluntary Sector, Directory of Social Change and The Media Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, P., M. Devenney and M. Locke (forthcoming) Laying the Foundations: A Rough Guide to Increasing Service Participant Involvement, Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, P., M. Locke and J. Dawson (1997) Consumerism or Democracy? User Involvement in the Control of Voluntary Organizations, Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1996) ‘The future of user involvement in the voluntary sector: a contribution to the debate’, in Commission on the Future of the Voluntary Sector, Meeting the Challenge to Change: Voluntary Action into the 21st Century, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. and J. Lewis (1997) ‘Contracting: what does it do to voluntary and nonprofit organizations?’, in Perri 6 and J. Kendall (eds) The Contract Culture in Public Services, Arena/Avebury, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., J. Langan and P. Hoggett (1995) Encouraging Diversity: Voluntary and Private Organisations in Community Care, School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumim, W. (1992) On Trust, National Council for Voluntary Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Michael Locke, Paul Robson and Steven Howlett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Locke, M., Robson, P., Howlett, S. (2001). Users: At the Centre or on the Sidelines?. In: Harris, M., Rochester, C. (eds) Voluntary Organisations and Social Policy in Britain. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80224-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics