Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Social History in Perspective ((SHP))

  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

Was poverty less in 1960 than 1900? There are compelling reasons to believe so. Average weekly earnings increased nearly tenfold between 1900 and 1960, double the increase in consumer prices, and the state had taken considerable responsibility for citizens’ welfare by the latter date.771 Of course, this conclusion implies that the term ‘poverty’ equates with the inability of individuals or families to attain certain basic needs. Once the definition of poverty moves away from this narrow definition, it is not as obvious that poverty was less in 1960 than it had been in 1900, though I would wish to support this contention as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Ian Gazeley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gazeley, I. (2003). Concluding Remarks. In: Poverty in Britain, 1900–1965. Social History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80217-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80217-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-71619-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80217-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics