Skip to main content
  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

Outside conventional literary histories, the vast secondary bibliography for eighteenth-century fiction can be broadly divided into two kinds of study. One typically provides a series of elaborate readings of canonical texts, together with a conceptual model that often seems tacked on as an afterthought. The other begins with a sophisticated hypothesis, which is then applied to a select group of writers — generally some permutation of Defoe, Richardson and Fielding.1 The two approaches have accounted for much academic work over the last half-century. Within the first category, Dorothy Van Ghent’s classic study of the English novel offered valuable insights into Moll Flanders and Tom Jones, whilst its hard-nosed reading of Clarissa shocks even yet;2 Van Ghent’s interpretations are still found recycled today, although few now remember her overall thesis.3 In the second group, Nancy Armstrong’s more recent Desire and Domestic Fiction has a well-articulated thesis for her ‘political history of the novel’, although it hardly refers to any actual eighteenth-century fiction beyond the first part of Pamela.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Dorothy Van Ghent, The English Novel: Form and Function (New York: Harper and Row, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nancy Armstrong, Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nancy Armstrong and Leonard Tennenhouse, The Imaginary Puritan: Literature, Intellectual Labor, and the Origins of Personal Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ioan Williams (ed.), Novel and Romance, 1700–1800: A Documentary Record (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See J. R. Moore’s A Checklist of the Writings of Daniel Defoe, 2nd edn (Hamden, Conn., 1971);

    Google Scholar 

  6. then P. N. Furbank and W. R. Owens, The Canonisation of Daniel Defoe (London, 1988) and A Critical Bibliography of Daniel Defoe.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Quoted by P. N. Furbank and W. R. Owens in Defoe: Deattributions (London: Hambledon Press, 1986), p. xvii.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lillian Robinson, ‘Treason Our Text: Feminist Challenges to the Literary Canon’, in Elaine Showalter (ed.), The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature and Theory (New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jane Spencer, The Rise of the Woman Novelist: From Aphra Behn to Jane Austen (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dale Spender, Mothers of the Novel: 100 Good Women Writers before Jane Austen (London: Pandora Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clive T. Probyn, English Fiction of the Eighteenth Century, 1700–1789 (New York: Longman, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janet Todd, The Sign of Angellica: Women, Writing and Fiction, 1660–1800 (London: Virago, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ros Ballaster, Seductive Forms: Women’s Amatory Fiction from 1684 to 1740 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. April Alliston, Virtue’s Faults: Correspondences in Eighteenth-Century British and French Women’s Fiction (Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Claudia L. Johnson, Equivocal Beings (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mary Anne Schofield, Masking and Unmasking the Female Mind (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Catherine Gallagher, Nobody’s Story: The Vanishing Acts of Women Writers in the Marketplace, 1670–1820 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ian Watt, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding (London: Chatto and Windus, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  19. See, for example, the findings of the Group discussed in J. Paul Hunter’s Before Novels: The Cultural Contexts of Eighteenth-Century English Fiction (New York: W. W. Norton, 1990), pp. 63–4 and pp. 112–13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See also Percy G. Adams, Travel Literature and the Evolution of the Novel (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Michael McKeon, The Origins of the English Novel, 1600–1740 (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robert Scholes and Robert Kellogg, The Nature of Narrative (London: Oxford University Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Northrop Frye, The Secular Scripture: A Study of the Structure of Romance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lennard J. Davis, Factual Fictions: The Origins of the English Novel (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Terry Castle, Masquerade and Civilization: The Carnivalesque in Eighteenth-Century English Culture and Fiction (Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Catherine Craft-Fairchild, Masquerade and Gender: Disguise and Identity in Eighteenth-Century Fictions by Women (University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. John Bender, Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of the Mind in Eighteenth-Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bender draws on Michel Foucault’s Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (London: Allen Lane, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  29. James Thompson, Models of Value: Eighteenth-Century Political Economy and the Novel (London: Duke University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Margaret Anne Doody, The True Story of the Novel (London: Fontana Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  31. This is effectively a political (read feminist and multi-cultural) updating of Thomas Hägg’s The Novel in Antiquity (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nicola J. Watson, Revolution and the Form of the British Novel, 1790–1825 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Mary Poovey, The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley and Jane Austen (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Gary Kelly, The English Jacobin Novel, 1780–1805 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976);

    Google Scholar 

  35. Marilyn Butler, Jane Austen and the War of Ideas (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975;

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eleanor Ty, Unsex’d Revolutionaries: Five Revolutionary Novelists of the 1790s (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Gary Kelly, Women, Writing and Revolution, 1790–1827 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Ronald Paulson, Don Quixote in England: The Aesthetics of Laughter (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 John Skinner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skinner, J. (2001). Critics and Theorists. In: An Introduction to Eighteenth-Century Fiction. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-62946-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics