Skip to main content

Problems of Representation

  • Chapter
Book cover Postmodernism and History

Part of the book series: Theory and History ((THHI))

  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of representation is at the heart of all postmodern thinking; indeed it could be suggested that is essentially what it is about, and everything that it has to say derives from the application and manipulation of this concept. The notorious phrase by Baudrillard that ‘the [first] Gulf War did not take place’ only makes sense on the presumption that all that could be known about the war was its televisual representations, and these, notoriously, were at the time manipulated to produce the outcome specified by the US alliance. In the past 200 years the representations available through visual images have multiplied exponentially, from the daguerreotype to the internet; nevertheless words, the text, remain the foundation of all representation — not only do they stand on their own as a form of representation, but without them visual images are drained of their meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Alun Munslow, Deconstructing History (London, 1997), p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keith Jenkins, ‘A Postmodern Reply to Perez Zagorin’, History and Theory, vol. 39, no. 2 (May 2000), pp. 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge, 1988), p. 126.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. See Sebastian Conrad, ‘Entangled Memories: Versions of the Past in Germany and Japan 1945–2001’, Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 38, no. 1 (January 2003), pp. 85–100; Naoko Shimazu, ’Popular Representations of the Past: The Case of Postwar Japan’, ibid., pp. 101–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Joan Wallach Scott, Gender and the Politics of History, rev. edn (New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joan Wallach Scott, Feminism and History (Oxford, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. An early expression of this was the article by Tony Judt, ‘A Clown in Regal Purple: Social History and the Historians’, History Workshop Journal, no. 7 (Spring 1979), pp. 66–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Willie Thompson, What Happened to History? (London, 2000), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gareth Stedman Jones, Languages of Class: Studies in English Working-Class History, 1832–1982 (Cambridge, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. John Belchem and Neville Kirk, ‘Introduction’, Languages of Labour (Aldershot, 1997), pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Willie Thompson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, W. (2004). Problems of Representation. In: Postmodernism and History. Theory and History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-62945-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-62945-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-96339-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62945-5

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics