Abstract
In returning to democratic rule in December 1983, Argentina became part of the world-wide trend initiated in the 1970s, which Samuel Huntington labelled ‘the third wave of democratisation in the history of the modern world’.1 Argentina mounted the wave with the election of President Raúl Alfonsín, after seven years of severe military dictatorship and a longer term of political instability, which extended throughout the century. After this, ten national elections were held in the country at regular intervals, as well as a great number of others at the provincial and local levels. In 1999, a fourth presidential period was initiated with the election of President Fernando de la Rúa, the candidate of the opposition Alliance who put an end to the Peronist Carlos Menem’s ten years in government. During these almost twenty years of democratic rule, regular, free and fair electoral processes took place and the other core features of democracy were also well respected: extensive protection for civil and political rights, freedom of the press and civilian control over the military.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For the minimal procedural conditions for democracy, consult Dahl (1989). Also Schmitter and Karl (1996: 42–3) for an extended procedural definition of democracy that includes control over non-elected officials, and O’Donnell (2000: 529) who similarly explains that elections must be decisive, in other words, that the winners should be allowed to occupy their posts and to adopt decisions without the veto of non-elected organizations (such as the military). For a meticulous review of current definitions of democracy and the convenience of adopting one ‘without adjectives’, see Collier and Levitsky (1997).
O’Donnell, G. (1998: 113). As the author explains in another work (O’Donnell 2000: 535), these characteristics (horizontal accountability, equality before the law and an independent judiciary) are not components of the definition of democracy. Instead, they serve to describe differences among the cases qualified as democratic by the restrictive definition.
Nelson, J. (1994: 61); Ducatenzeiler, G. and Oxhorn, P. (1994: 42); Dominguez, J. (1998: 89).
See, for instance, Haggard and Kaufman (1995); O’Donnell (1994b); Smith, Acuna and Gamarra (1994); Torre, J. (1994).
Copyright information
© 2002 Mariana Llanos
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Llanos, M. (2002). Introduction. In: Privatization and Democracy in Argentina. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-59607-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-59607-8_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42456-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59607-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)