Skip to main content

The Philosopher’s Stone

  • Chapter
Science and Controversy

Part of the book series: Macmillan Science ((MACSCI))

  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

The objects that interest astronomers are usually there to be studied as, and when, desired (presuming, of course, that the weather does not interfere, and that the time and place are right). Occasionally, however, there are temporary changes in the heavens which can be observed over only a restricted period of time. The year 1866 was distinguished by two events of this latter kind. In May of that year, a bright new star, or nova, flared up in the constellation of Corona Borealis, the Northern Crown. Novae formed a recognised, if infrequent, astronomical phenomenon. It was known that they brightened for a period of some months and then faded again. The importance of this new one — which came to be called in the astronomical jargon T Cr B — was that it was the first to appear since the spectroscope had been introduced into astronomy. Within a few days of the nova being reported, Huggins had examined its spectrum. He found it partly resembled that of an ordinary star, with dark absorption lines, but that superimposed on this there were a few bright lines, some of which were certainly due to hydrogen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 50.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Select Bibliography

  • For Rayleigh’s life (and, in particular, his work on the noble gases) see: R. J. Strutt, Life of John William Strutt, Third Baron Rayleigh (University of Wiscon-sin Press, 1968). There is a description of the developments in astronomical spectroscopy at Harvard and of contacts between astronomers there and their British colleagues in:

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Z. Jones and L. G. Boyd, The Harvard College Observatory (1839–1919) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971).

    Book  Google Scholar 

References

  1. W. Huggins, Phil Trans., 154, 437 (1864).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Huggins to Lockyer, 6 May 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. N. Lockyer to W. Huggins, 7 May 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Huggins to Lockyer, 7 May 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. N. Lockyer, The Suns Place in Nature, Macmillan (1897), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Huggins, Report of the British Association (1891), Part I, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. N. Lockyer, op. cit., p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Royal Society Archives [RR. 10.360], 27 May 1890.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Huggins to Christie, 25 October 1890 [RGO].

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. G. Stokes to Lockyer, 7 October 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. N. Lockyer, Meteoritic Hypothesis, p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. N. Lockyer, ibid., p. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. H. Darwin to Lockyer, 18 March 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Roberts to Lockyer, 29 December 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Huggins, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 14, 42 (1865).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. N. Lockyer, The Suns Place in Nature, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. C. Vogel, Astronomische Nachrichten, 84, No. 2000 (1874).

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Ramsay, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 58, 81 (1895).

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Ramsay, Nature, 53, 366 (1896).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T M. and W. L. Lockyer (Eds.), Life and Work of Sir Norman Lockyer, Macmillan (1928), p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Runge to Lockyer, 20 October 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. G. Bonney to Lockyer, 16 February 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. N. Lockyer, Meteoritic Hypothesis, p. 466.

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Roberts to Lockyer, 2 October 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. N. Lockyer, The Suns Place in Nature, pp. 232–3.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. N. Lockyer, ibid, p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lockyer to E. C. Pickering, 3 May 1887 [IC-HCO]

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lockyer to E. C. Pickering, 21 January 1899 [IC-HCO].

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. B. Airy to Lockyer, 11 February 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Tennyson, ‘God and the Universe’ (1892).

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. Macpherson (Jnr.), Astronomers of Today, Gall and Inglis (1905), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Punch, 92, 252(1887).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 A. J. Meadows

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meadows, A.J. (2008). The Philosopher’s Stone. In: Science and Controversy. Macmillan Science. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-59393-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-59393-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58724-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59393-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics