Skip to main content

The Man of Science

  • Chapter
Science and Controversy

Part of the book series: Macmillan Science ((MACSCI))

  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

The 1860s formed a crucial period in the development of astronomy. Since the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century, in which astronomy had played a major role, astronomers had been trying to build up a picture of the world based mainly on the accurate measurement of position and of changes in position. Newton had suggested that one force, gravitation, ruled the uni-verse, and throughout the eighteenth century astronomers had been concerned with substantiating his claim and extending it to as many cases of bodies in motion as possible. Since the planets and their satellites constituted the most obvious examples of motions amongst the celestial bodies, attention had at first been mainly confined to the solar system. By the nineteenth century, the most obvious difficulties in the reconciliation of Newtonian theory with the observations had been overcome; the prospect for astronomy seemed to be mainly one of increasing the accuracy of both observation and theory. In this respect, the state of astronomy in the first half of the nineteenth century might be compared with that of physics in the second half. However, just when the heroic age of classical astronomy seemed to be drawing to a close, a new aspect of astronomy began to blossom, the study of celestial bodies as physical objects rather than simply as dynamical ones. Of course, there had always been some work of this type in astronomy. When Galileo first used a telescope for astronomical observation, two of his earliest discoveries were the rugged nature of the Moon’s surface and the existence of dark spots on the Sun’s face. But this sort of observation had come to take a subordinate place to the main interest in positional work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 50.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Select Bibliography

  • For more extensive information on the study of the Sun during the nine-teenth, and early twentieth, centuries, the following books may be consulted: A. C. Clerke, A Popular History of Astronomy during the Nineteenth Century (A. and C. Black, 1885 and subsequent editions);

    Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Meadows, Early Solar Physics (Pergamon, 1970);

    Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Mitchell, Eclipses of the Sun (Columbia University Press, New York, 1923;

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A. Young, The Sun (Kegan, Paul and Trench, 1882 and subsequent editions). A brief description of the developments in the Royal Society during Lockyer’s lifetime is given in:

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Stimson, Scientists and Amateurs: a History of the Royal Society (Henry Schuman, New York, 1948). Biographies and autobiographies of influential scientists with whom Lockyer came into contact early in his research career include: Sketches from the Life of Edward Frankland (Spottiswoode, 1902);

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Airy (Ed.), Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy (Cambridge University Press, 1896);

    Google Scholar 

  • H. E. Roscoe, The Life and Experiences of Sir Henry Enfield Roscoe (Macmillan, 1906);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • S. P Thompson, The Life of William Thomson (Macmillan, 2 vols., 1910). There is no full-scale biography of Huggins, but reference may be made to:

    Google Scholar 

  • E. W. Maunder, Sir William Huggins and Spectroscopic Astronomy (The People’s Books, 1912).

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Admiral W. H. Smyth, Sidereal Chromatics, London (privately printed), (1864), p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. N. Lockyer, Contributions to Solar Physics, Macmillan (1874), p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. R. Birt to Lockyer, 31 May 1861.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. R. Birt to Lockyer, 21 May 1861.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Phillips, British Association Report, Part II, p. 15 (1853).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Huggins to Lockyer, 20 June 1864.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. N. Lockyer, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 15, 256 (1866).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. N. Lockyer, Philosophical Transactions, 159, 425 (1869).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Stewart, Nature, 7, 301 (1873).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. N. Lockyer, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 17, 128 (1868).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W. De la Rue to G. G. Stokes, 17 December 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Frankland to Lockyer, 7 April 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Frankland to Lockyer, 9 September 1872.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. N. Lockyer, Contributions to Solar Physics, Macmillan (1874), p. 645.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. N. Lockyer, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 17, 350 (1869).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. G. Stokes to Lockyer, 1 October 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. N. Lockyer, Philosophical Magazine, 39, 63 (1870).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. N. Lockyer to A. Secchi, 24 January [1873?].

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Respighi to Lockyer, 13 June 1872.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. E. Roscoe to Lockyer, 12 January 1870.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. A. Young to Lockyer, 21 January 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. K. Clifford, The Commonsense of the Exact Sciences, Knopf, New York (1946 Reprint), p. xxii.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. B. Airy to Lockyer, 7 July 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. A. Young to Lockyer, 29 September 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. N. Lockyer, Contributions to Solar Physics, Macmillan (1874), p. 341.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. N. Lockyer, ibid., p. 344.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Pritchard to Lockyer, 29 December 1865.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Stewart to G. B. Airy, 6 January 1869 [RGO].

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. B. Airy to B. Stewart, 7 January 1869 [RGO].

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Frankland to Lockyer, 23 March 1871.

    Google Scholar 

  32. W. De la Rue to Lockyer, 30 April 1870.

    Google Scholar 

  33. There is some uncertainty as to the authorship of these lines (and they appear in various guises), but Clerk Maxwell seems to be the probable author. See: A. L. Cortie, Astrophysical Journal, 53, 241 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 A. J. Meadows

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meadows, A.J. (2008). The Man of Science. In: Science and Controversy. Macmillan Science. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-59393-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-59393-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58724-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59393-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics