Abstract
The 1860s formed a crucial period in the development of astronomy. Since the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century, in which astronomy had played a major role, astronomers had been trying to build up a picture of the world based mainly on the accurate measurement of position and of changes in position. Newton had suggested that one force, gravitation, ruled the uni-verse, and throughout the eighteenth century astronomers had been concerned with substantiating his claim and extending it to as many cases of bodies in motion as possible. Since the planets and their satellites constituted the most obvious examples of motions amongst the celestial bodies, attention had at first been mainly confined to the solar system. By the nineteenth century, the most obvious difficulties in the reconciliation of Newtonian theory with the observations had been overcome; the prospect for astronomy seemed to be mainly one of increasing the accuracy of both observation and theory. In this respect, the state of astronomy in the first half of the nineteenth century might be compared with that of physics in the second half. However, just when the heroic age of classical astronomy seemed to be drawing to a close, a new aspect of astronomy began to blossom, the study of celestial bodies as physical objects rather than simply as dynamical ones. Of course, there had always been some work of this type in astronomy. When Galileo first used a telescope for astronomical observation, two of his earliest discoveries were the rugged nature of the Moon’s surface and the existence of dark spots on the Sun’s face. But this sort of observation had come to take a subordinate place to the main interest in positional work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Select Bibliography
For more extensive information on the study of the Sun during the nine-teenth, and early twentieth, centuries, the following books may be consulted: A. C. Clerke, A Popular History of Astronomy during the Nineteenth Century (A. and C. Black, 1885 and subsequent editions);
A. J. Meadows, Early Solar Physics (Pergamon, 1970);
S. A. Mitchell, Eclipses of the Sun (Columbia University Press, New York, 1923;
C. A. Young, The Sun (Kegan, Paul and Trench, 1882 and subsequent editions). A brief description of the developments in the Royal Society during Lockyer’s lifetime is given in:
D. Stimson, Scientists and Amateurs: a History of the Royal Society (Henry Schuman, New York, 1948). Biographies and autobiographies of influential scientists with whom Lockyer came into contact early in his research career include: Sketches from the Life of Edward Frankland (Spottiswoode, 1902);
W. Airy (Ed.), Autobiography of Sir George Biddell Airy (Cambridge University Press, 1896);
H. E. Roscoe, The Life and Experiences of Sir Henry Enfield Roscoe (Macmillan, 1906);
S. P Thompson, The Life of William Thomson (Macmillan, 2 vols., 1910). There is no full-scale biography of Huggins, but reference may be made to:
E. W. Maunder, Sir William Huggins and Spectroscopic Astronomy (The People’s Books, 1912).
References
Admiral W. H. Smyth, Sidereal Chromatics, London (privately printed), (1864), p. 90.
J. N. Lockyer, Contributions to Solar Physics, Macmillan (1874), p. xi.
W. R. Birt to Lockyer, 31 May 1861.
W. R. Birt to Lockyer, 21 May 1861.
J. Phillips, British Association Report, Part II, p. 15 (1853).
W. Huggins to Lockyer, 20 June 1864.
J. N. Lockyer, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 15, 256 (1866).
J. N. Lockyer, Philosophical Transactions, 159, 425 (1869).
B. Stewart, Nature, 7, 301 (1873).
J. N. Lockyer, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 17, 128 (1868).
W. De la Rue to G. G. Stokes, 17 December 1868.
E. Frankland to Lockyer, 7 April 1869.
E. Frankland to Lockyer, 9 September 1872.
J. N. Lockyer, Contributions to Solar Physics, Macmillan (1874), p. 645.
J. N. Lockyer, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 17, 350 (1869).
G. G. Stokes to Lockyer, 1 October 1869.
J. N. Lockyer, Philosophical Magazine, 39, 63 (1870).
J. N. Lockyer to A. Secchi, 24 January [1873?].
L. Respighi to Lockyer, 13 June 1872.
H. E. Roscoe to Lockyer, 12 January 1870.
C. A. Young to Lockyer, 21 January 1871.
W. K. Clifford, The Commonsense of the Exact Sciences, Knopf, New York (1946 Reprint), p. xxii.
G. B. Airy to Lockyer, 7 July 1871.
C. A. Young to Lockyer, 29 September 1871.
J. N. Lockyer, Contributions to Solar Physics, Macmillan (1874), p. 341.
J. N. Lockyer, ibid., p. 344.
C. Pritchard to Lockyer, 29 December 1865.
Ibid.
B. Stewart to G. B. Airy, 6 January 1869 [RGO].
G. B. Airy to B. Stewart, 7 January 1869 [RGO].
E. Frankland to Lockyer, 23 March 1871.
W. De la Rue to Lockyer, 30 April 1870.
There is some uncertainty as to the authorship of these lines (and they appear in various guises), but Clerk Maxwell seems to be the probable author. See: A. L. Cortie, Astrophysical Journal, 53, 241 (1921).
Copyright information
© 2008 A. J. Meadows
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meadows, A.J. (2008). The Man of Science. In: Science and Controversy. Macmillan Science. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-59393-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-59393-0_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58724-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59393-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)