Skip to main content

General Equilibrium Trade Theory and Firm Behaviour

  • Chapter
  • 1201 Accesses

Abstract

What determines countries’ specialization patterns and the structure of world trade? What are the effects of international trade liberalization on national economies? While these have always been the driving questions of international trade theory, the answers have varied through time depending on historical contingencies (Irwin, 1996).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alessandria, G., and J. Kaboski (2007) ‘Pricing-to-market and the failure of absolute PPP’. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Paper No. 07-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S.P., A. de Palma and J.-F. Thisse (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antràs, P. (2003) ‘Firms, contracts, and trade structure’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 1375–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asplund, M., and V. Nocke (2006) ‘Firm turnover in imperfectly competitive markets’, Review of Economic Studies 73, 295–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aw B., S. Chung and M. Roberts (2000) ‘Productivity and turnover in the export market: Micro-level evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China)’, World Bank Economic Review 14, 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.E., and Ph. Martin (1999) ‘Two waves of globalisation: superficial similarities, fundamental differences’, NBER Working Paper No. 6904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barba, Navaretti G., and A.J. Venables (2004) Multinationals Firms in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, K., A.R. Lamorgese, G.I.P. Ottaviano and T. Tabuchi (2009a) ‘Beyond the home market effect: Market size and specialization in a multi-country world’, Journal of International Economics, 79(2), 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, K., G. Mion, Y. Murata and J. Südekum (2009b) ‘Trade, wages and productivity’. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 7369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, K., G. Mion and G.I.P. Ottaviano (2009c) ‘Economic integration and industry reallocations: Some theory with numbers’. In Jovanovic, M. (ed.), International Handbook of Economic Integration, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers, pp. 169–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, K., and Y. Murata (2007) ‘General equilibrium models of monopolistic competition: a new approach’, Journal of Economic Theory 136, 776–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B., and B. Jensen (1999) ‘Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both?’, Journal of International Economics 47, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B., B. Jensen and P.K. Schott (2006) ‘Trade costs, firms and productivity’, Journal of Monetary Economics 53, 917–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B., S.J. Redding and P.K. Schott (2007a) ‘Comparative advantage and heterogeneous firms’, Review of Economic Studies 74, 31–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2007b) ‘Firms in international trade’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 21, 105–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard A.B., J. Eaton, J. Jensen and S. Kortum (2003) ‘Plants and productivity in international trade’, American Economic Review 93, 1268–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J.A., and P.R. Krugman (1983) ‘A “reciprocal dumping” model of international trade’, Journal of International Economics 15, 313–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustos, P. (2011) ‘Trade liberalization, exports and technology upgrading: Evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian firms’, American Economic Review 101(1), 2011, 304–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, E.H. (1933) The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerides, S., S. Lach and J. Tybout (1998) ‘Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 903–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Aspremont, C., R. Dos Santos Ferreira and L.-A. Gérard-Varet (1996) ‘On the Dixit-Stiglitz model of monopolistic competition’, American Economic Review 86, 623–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debaere, P. (2005) ‘Monopolistic competition and trade, revisited: testing the model without testing for gravity’, Journal of International Economics 66, 249–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K., and V. Norman (1980) Theory of International Trade: A Dual General Equilibrium Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K., and J.E. Stiglitz (1977) ‘Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity’, American Economic Review 67, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W. (1982) ‘National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade’, American Economic Review 72, 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M., and P.R. Krugman (2004), ‘The new economic geography: Past, present and future’, Papers in Regional Science 83, 139–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., and J.-F. Thisse (2002) Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., P.R. Krugman and A.J. Venables (1999) The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, J.-J. and J.-Ph. Vial (1972) ‘Oligopoly à la Cournot in general equilibrium analysis’, Journal of Economic Theory 4, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., and C. Milner (1986) The Economics of Intra-Industry Trade. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman (2002) ‘Integration vs. outsourcing in industry equilibrium’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 85–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, H.G., and P.J. Lloyd (1975) Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory of Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G.H., and C. Xiang (2004) ‘The home market effect and bilateral trade patterns’, American Economic Review 94, 1108–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskel, J., and H. Wolf (2001) ‘The law of one price — a case study’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 103, 545–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1984a) ‘Increasing returns, imperfect markets, and trade theory’, in R.W. Jones and P.B. Kenen (eds) Handbook of International Economics, vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1984b) ‘The factor content of foreign trade’, Economic Journal 94, 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., and P.R. Krugman (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E., M. Melitz and S. Yeaple (2004) ‘Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms’, American Economic Review 94, 300–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D., and J. Levinsohn (1995) ‘Monopolistic competition and international trade: Reconsidering the evidence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 799–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D., and A. Skiba (2004) ‘Shipping the good apples out? An empirical confirmation of the Alchian-Allen conjecture’, Journal of Political Economy 112, 1384–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. (1996) Against the Tide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. (1979) ‘Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade’, Journal of International Economics 9, 469–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1980) ‘Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade’, American Economic Review 70, 950–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. (1991) ‘Increasing returns and economic geography’, Journal of Political Economy 99, 483–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R., and A.J. Venables (1995) ‘Globalization and the inequality of nations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 857–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laguerre, E.N. (1883) ‘Mémoire sur la théorie des équations numériques’, Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 3, 99–146. Trans. by S.A. Levin (2002), ‘On the theory of numeric equations’, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S.B. (1961) An Essay on Trade and Transformation. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R. (1981) ‘Trade and gains from trade with imperfect competition’, Journal of International Economics 11, 531–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2002) Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R., and A.J. Venables (2000) ‘The theory of endowment, intra-industry and multi-national trade’, Journal of International Economics 52, 209–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T., and G.I.P. Ottaviano (2007) ‘The happy few: The internationalisation of European firms’, Brussels: Bruegel, Blueprint 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M.J. (2003) ‘The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity’, Econometrica 71, 1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M.J., and G.I.P. Ottaviano (2008) ‘Market size, trade, and productivity’, Review of Economic Studies 75, 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neary, P.J. (2003) ‘International trade in general oligopolistic equilibrium’. Mimeo, University College: Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G.I.P., T. Tabuchi and J.-F. Thisse (2002) ‘Agglomeration and trade revisited’, International Economic Review 43, 409–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavcnik, N. (2002) Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants, Review of Economic Studies 69, 245–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., and H. Sonnenschein (1977) ‘On the foundations of monopolistic competition’, Econometrica 45, 101–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovska, I. (2008) ‘Income differences and prices of tradables’. Mimeo, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1976) ‘Product selection, fixed costs, and monopolistic competition’, Review of Economic Studies 43, 217–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomiura, E. (2007) Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level, Journal of International Economics 72, 113–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tybout, J. (2003) ‘Plant and firm-level evidence on new trade theories’, in Harrigan, J. (ed) Handbook of International Economics, vol. 38, Oxford: Basil-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, X. (1999) Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Kristian Behrens and Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Behrens, K., Ottaviano, G.I.P. (2013). General Equilibrium Trade Theory and Firm Behaviour. In: Bernhofen, D., Falvey, R., Greenaway, D., Kreickemeier, U. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of International Trade. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30531-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics