Skip to main content

Gravity Equations and Economic Frictions in the World Economy

  • Chapter
Palgrave Handbook of International Trade

Abstract

At the same time that the modern theory of international trade due to comparative advantage developed in the post-World War II era to explain the patterns of international trade using 2 × 2 × 2 general equilibrium models, a small and separate line of empirical research in international trade emerged to ‘explain’ statistically actual aggregate bilateral trade flows among large numbers of countries. Drawing upon analogy to Isaac Newton’s Law of Gravitation, these international trade economists noted that observed bilateral aggregate trade flows between any pair of countries i and j could be explained very well using statistical methods by the product of the economic sizes of the two countries (GDP i GDP j ) divided by the distance between the country pair’s major economic centers (DIST ij ). Specifically, these researchers conjectured that:

$$P{X_{ij}} = {\beta _0}{(GD{P_i})^{{\beta _1}}}{(GD{P_j})^{{\beta _2}}}{(DIS{T_{ij}})^{{\beta _3}}}{\varepsilon _{ij}}$$
(1)

or

$$\ln P{X_{ij}} = ln{\beta _0} + {\beta _1}ln{\mkern 1mu} {\text{GD}}{{\text{P}}_i} + {\beta _2}ln{\mkern 1mu} {\text{GD}}{{\text{P}}_j} + {\beta _3}ln{\mkern 1mu} {\text{DIS}}{{\text{T}}_{ij}} + ln{\mkern 1mu} {\varepsilon _{ij}},$$
(2)

where PX ij is the value (in current prices) of the merchandise trade flow from exporter i to importer j, GDP i (GDP j ) is the level of nominal gross domestic product in country i (j), DIST ij is the bilateral physical distance between the economic centers of countries i and j, and ε ij is assumed to be a log normally distributed error term. In equation (2), ln refers to the natural logarithm. Intuition suggested that β1 > 0, β2 > 0, and β3 < 0. In the 1960s, equations (1) and (2) came to be known among international trade economists as the ‘gravity equation’ — owing to its obvious similarity to Newton’s gravity equation in physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrams, Richard K. (1980) ‘International trade flows under flexible exchange rates.’ Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, March, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, Norman D. (1973) ‘The effect of EEC and EFTA on European trade: a temporal cross section analysis’, American Economic Review, vol. 63, No. 5, December, 881–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcala, Francisco, and Antonio Ciccone (2004) ‘Trade and productivity’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119, No. 2, May, 613–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, Fernando, and Robert E. Lucas, Jr. (2007) ‘General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton Kortum model of international trade’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 54, 1726–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiti, Mary, and Katherine Wakelin (2003) ‘Investment liberalization and international trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 61, No. 1, October, 101–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E. (1979) ‘A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation’, American Economic Review, vol. 69, No. 1, March, 106–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E., and Douglas Marcouiller (2002) ‘Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 84, No. 2, May, 342–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E., and Eric van Wincoop (2003) ‘Gravity with gravitas’, American Economic Review, vol. 93, No. 1, March, 170–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2004) ‘Trade costs’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 42, September, 691–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E., and Yoto V. Yotov (2009) ‘The changing incidence of geography’, Working Paper, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkolakis, Costas (2008) ‘Market penetration and the new consumers margin in international trade’, Working Paper, Yale University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Badinger, Harald (2008) ‘Trade policy and productivity’, European Economic Review, vol. 52, July, 867–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Scott L., and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand (2001) ‘The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity’, vol. 53, No. 1, February, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2002) ‘On the endogeneity of international trade flows and free trade agreements’, Working Paper, University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2004) ‘Economic determinants of free trade agreements’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 64, No. 1, October, 29–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2007) ‘Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?’ Journal of International Economics, vol. 71, No. 1, March, 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Scott L., Jeffrey H. Bergstrand and Erika Vidal (2007) ‘Free trade agreements in the Americas: are the trade effects larger than anticipated?’, The World Economy, vol. 30, No. 9, September, 1347–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Scott L., Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Peter Egger and Patrick McLaughlin (2008) ‘Do economic integration agreements actually work? Issues in understanding the causes and consequences of the growth of regionalism’, The World Economy, vol. 31, No. 4, April, 461–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Scott L., and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand (2009a) ‘Bonus vetus OLS: a simple method for approximating international trade cost effects using the Gravity Equation’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 77, No. 1, February, 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2009b) ‘Estimating the effects of free trade agreements on international trade flows using matching econometrics’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 77, No. 1, February, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Richard E. (2005) ‘The Euro’s trade effect’, paper prepared for a European Central Bank workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Richard E., and James Harrigan (2007) ‘Zeros, quality and space: trade theory and trade evidence’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 13214, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Richard E., and Daria Taglioni (2007) ‘Trade effects of the Euro: a comparison of estimators’, Journal of Economic Integration, vol. 22, No. 4, December, 780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, Badi H., Peter Egger and Michael Pfaffermayr (2003) ‘A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models’, Economics Letters, vol. 80, 391–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2008) ‘Estimating regional trade agreement effects on FDI in an interdependent world’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 145, 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, Rene (1997) ‘Antidumping and tariff jumping Japanese firms’ DFI in the European Union and United States’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 133, 419–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénassy Quéré, Agnès, Maylis Coupet and Thierry Mayer (2007) ‘Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment’, The World Economy, vol. 30, No. 5, May, 764–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. (1981) The Gravity Equation in International Trade. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin at Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1985) ‘The Gravity Equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67, No. 3, August, 474–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., and Peter Egger (2004) ‘A theoretical and empirical model of international trade and foreign direct investment with outsourcing: part 1, developed countries’, Working Paper, University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007) ‘A knowledge and physical capital model of international trade flows, foreign direct investment, and multinational enterprises’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 73, No. 2, 278–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2009) ‘A general equilibrium theory for estimating gravity equations of bilateral FDI, final goods trade, and intermediate goods trade’, in S. Brakman and P. van Bergeijk (eds), The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand Jeffrey H., Peter Egger and Mario Larch (2008a) ‘Gravity redux: structural estimation of gravity equations, elasticities of substitution, and economic welfare under asymmetric bilateral trade costs’, Working Paper, University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2008b) ‘The New Expats: economic determinants of bilateral expatriate, FDI, and international trade flows’, Working Paper, University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding and Peter K. Schott (2009) ‘The margins of U.S. trade (long version)’, Working Paper CES 09 18, U.S. Census Bureau.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, S., and Gregory D. Hess (2006) ‘How much does violence tax trade?’ Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 88, No. 4, 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, Bruce A. (2002) ‘Tariff jumping antidumping duties’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 57, No. 1, 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, Bruce A., and Ronald Davies (2004) ‘The effects of bilateral tax treaties on U.S. FDI activity’, International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 11, 601–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, Bruce A., Ronald Davies, Glen R. Waddell and Helen Naughton (2007) ‘FDI in space: spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment’, European Economic Review, vol. 51, No. 5, July, 1303–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, George J. (1994) ‘The economics of immigration’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 32, No. 4, December, 1667–1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1999) The economic analysis of immigration’, in O.C. Ashenfelter and David Card (eds), Handbook of Labour Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brada, Josef C., and Jose A. Mendez (1985) ‘Economic integration among developed, developing, and centrally planned economies: a comparative analysis’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67, No. 4, November, 549–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, Lael S. (1997) ‘An empirical assessment of the Proximity Concentration Hypothesis trade off between multinational sales and trade’, American Economic Review, vol. 87, No. 4, September, 520–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, H.C. (1865) Principles of Social Science. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, David, James R. Markusen and Keith E. Maskus (2001) ‘Estimating the knowledge capital model of the multinational enterprise’, American Economic Review, vol. 91, No. 3, June, 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrère, Céline (2006) ‘Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the Gravity Model’, European Economic Review, vol. 50, 223–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, Thomas (2008) ‘Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade’, American Economic Review, vol. 98, No. 4, September, 1707–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, I. Hui, and Howard J. Wall (2005) ‘Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, January/February, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • De, Prahir (2008) ‘Trade Costs and Infrastructure: Analysis of the effects of trade impediments in Asia’, Integration and Trade, No. 28, January–June, 241–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, Mihir A., Fritz C. Foley and James R. Hines, Jr. (2004) ‘Foreign direct investment in a world of multiple taxes’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 88, No. 12, 2727–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disdier, Anne Celia, and Keith Head (2008) ‘The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 90, No. 1, February, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash, and Joseph E. (1977) ‘Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity’, American Economic Review, vol. 67, No. 3, June, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, David (2009) ‘Railroads of the Raj: estimating the impact of transportation infrastructure’, London School of Economics Working Paper, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, Rudiger, Stanley Fischer, and Paul A. Samuelson (1977) ‘Comparative advantage, trade, and payments in a Ricardian model with a continuum of goods’, American Economic Review, vol. 67, 823–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlevy, James A., and William K. Hutchinson (1999) ‘The impact of immigration on American import trade in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries’, The Journal of Economic History, vol. 59, 1043–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, Jonathan, and Akiko Tamura (1994) ‘Bilateralism and regionalism in Japanese and U.S. trade and direct foreign investment patterns’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol. 8, No. 4, December, 478–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum (2002) ‘Technology, geography, and trade’, Econometrica, vol. 70, 1741–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, Peter (2000) ‘A note on the proper econometric specification of the Gravity Equation’, Economics Letters, vol. 66, 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2002) ‘An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials’, The World Economy, vol. 25, 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2004) ‘On the problem of endogenous unobserved effects in the estimation of gravity models’, Journal of Economic Integration, vol. 19, 182–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, Peter, and Michael Pfaffermayr (2003) ‘The proper panel econometric specification of the Gravity Equation: a three way model with bilateral interaction effects’, Empirical Economics, vol. 28, 571–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2004) ‘The impact of bilateral investment treaties on foreign direct investment’, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 32, 788–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, Peter, Mario Larch, Kevin E. Staub and Rainer Winkelmann (2009) ‘The trade effects of endogenous preferential trade agreements’, Working Paper, University of Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, Robert C. (2004) Advanced International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2009) ‘Measuring the gains from trade under manopolistic competition’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 15593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, Robert C., James R. Markusen and Andrew K. Rose (2001) ‘Using the Gravity Equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade’, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 34, No. 2, May, 430–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felbermayr, Gabriel, and Wilhelm Kohler (2006) ‘Exploring the intensive and extensive margins of world trade’, Review of World Economics, vol. 142, 642–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois, Joseph, and Miriam Manchin (2007) ‘Institutions, infrastructure, and trade’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4152, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, Jeffrey H. (1997) Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, Jeffrey, and David Romer ‘Does trade cause growth?’ American Economic Review, vol. 89, No. 3, June, 379–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, Jeffrey, and Andrew K. Rose (2002) ‘An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117, No. 2, May, 437–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. (2006) ‘People flows in globalization’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20, No. 2, Spring, 145–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, Sucharita, and Steven Yamarik (2004) ‘Are regional trading arrangements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 63, No. 2, July, 369–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, Salvador, Rafael Llorca and J. Antonio Martinez Serrano (2008) ‘Assessing the enlargement and deepening of the European Union’, The World Economy, vol. 31, No. 9, September, 1253–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girma, Sourafel, and Zhihao Yu (2002) ‘The link between immigration and trade: evidence from the United Kingdom’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 138, No. 1, 115–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Reuven, and Andrew K. Rose (2001) ‘Does a currency union affect trade? The Time Series evidence’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8396, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Reuven, and Alan M. Taylor (2009) ‘Collateral damage: trade disruption and the economic impact of war’, Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, Steven, and Daniel Shapiro (2002) ‘Global foreign direct investment flows: the role of governance infrastructure’, World Development, vol. 30, No. 11 1899–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, David (1994) ‘Immigrant links to the home country: empirical implications for U.S. bilateral trade flows’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 76, No. 2, May, 302–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowa, Joanne, and Edward D. Mansfield ‘Power politics and international trade’, American Political Science Review, vol. 87, No. 2, June, 408–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grazalian, Pascal L., and W. Hartley Furtan (2005) ‘The border effects: recognizing the role of FDI’, Working Paper, University of Saskatchewan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriou, Christopher (2007) ‘Landlockedness, infrastructure, and trade: new estimates for central Asian countries’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4335, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogger, Jeffrey, and Gordon H. Hanson (2008) ‘Income maximization and the selection and sorting of international migrants’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 13821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Gordon H. (2006) ‘Illegal migration from Mexico to the United States’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 44, No. 4, December, 869–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, Timothy J., and Jeffrey G. Williamson (2002) ‘What fundamentals drive world migration?’ National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9159.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2005) Global Migration and the World Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, Keith, and John Ries (1998) ‘Immigration and trade creation: econometric evidence from Canada’, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 31, No. 1, February, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2001) ‘Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the patter of U.S.-Canada Trade’, American Economic Review, vol. 91, No. 4, September, 858–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2008) ‘FDI as an outcome of the market for corporate control: theory and evidence’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 74, No. 1, January 2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, Elhanan, and Paul Krugman (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, Elhanan, Marc J. Melitz and Yona Rubinstein (2008) ‘Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 123, No. 2, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, Elhanan, Marc J. Melitz and Stephen R. Yeaple (2004) ‘Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms’, American Economic Review, vol. 94, No. 1, March, 300–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, David (1999) ‘Toward a geography of trade costs’, Working Paper, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2001) ‘Time as a barrier to trade’, Working Paper, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2007) ‘Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 21, No. 3, 131–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irac, Delphine (2004) ‘Distance and foreign direct investment: evidence from OECD countries’, Working Paper, Columbia University, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, Walter (1954) ‘Location theory and trade theory: short run analysis’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 68, No. 2, May, 305–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, Walter (1960) Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, Walter, and Merton J. Peck (1954) ‘Location theory and international and interregional trade theory’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 68, No. 1, February, 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinert, Jorn, and Farid Toubal (2005) ‘Gravity for FDI’, Working Paper, Georg August Universitat Gottingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul (1979) ‘Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 9, 469–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Huiwen, and Susan Chun (2006) ‘U.S. exports and multinational production’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 88, No. 3, August, 531–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, Edward E., and Robert M. Stern (1970) Quantitative International Economics. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jong Wha, and Philip Swagel (1997) ‘Trade barriers and trade flows’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 79, 372–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy Yeyati, Eduardo, Ernesto Stein and Christian Daude (2002a) ‘Regional integration and the location of FDI’, Inter American Development Bank Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2002b) ‘The FTAA and the location of foreign direct investment’, Inter American Development Bank Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limäo, Nuno, and Anthony J. Venables (2001) ‘Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade,’ The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 15, No. 3, 451–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnemann, Hans (1966) An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, James R. (1984) ‘Multinationals, multi plant economies, and the gains from trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 16, 206–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2002) Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, James R., and Anthony J. Venables (1998) ‘Multinational firms and the new trade theory’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 46, 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2000) ‘The theory of endowment, intra industry and multinational trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 52, December 209–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edward D., and Rachel Bronson (1997) ‘Alliances, preferential trading arrangements, and international trade’, American Political Science Review, vol. 91, No. 1, 94–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner and B. Peter Rosendorff (2000) ‘Free to trade: democracies, autocracies, and international trade’, American Political Science Review, vol. 94, No. 2, June, 305–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Phillipe, Thierry Mayer and Mathias Thoenig (2008) ‘Make trade, not war’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 75, No. 3, 865–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mátyás, László (1997) ‘Proper econometric specification of the Gravity Model’, The World Economy, vol. 20, No. 3, 363–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, John (1995) ‘National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns’, American Economic Review, vol. 85, No. 3, September, 615–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, Marc J. (2003) ‘The impact of trade on intra industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity’, Econometrica, vol. 71, No. 6, November, 1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, Carmellah (1959) ‘The estimation of transport costs in international trade’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 67, No. 1, February, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutti, John, and Harry Grubert (2004) ‘Empirical asymmetries in foreign direct investment and taxation’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 62, 337–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedercorn, John H., and Burley V. Bechdolt, Jr. (1969) ‘An economic derivation of the “Gravity Law” of spatial interaction’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 9, 273–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedercorn, John H., and Josef D. Moorehead (1974) ‘The commodity flow gravity model: a theoretical reassessment’, Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4, 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norbäck, Pehr Johan, Dieter Urban and Stefan Westerberg (2007) ‘The economics of multinational firms’, CESifo Working Paper, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Erling (1971) International Trade Theory and Regional Income Differences: United States 1880–1950. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, Solomon W. (1980) ‘Conflict and trade’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 24, No. 1, March, 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, Solomon W., and Carlos Seiglie (2006) ‘Trade, peace, and democracy: an analysis of dyadic dispute’, Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA) Working Paper 2170, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollins, Brian M. (1989) ‘Conflict, cooperation, and commerce: the effect of international political interactions on bilateral trade flows’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 33, No. 3, August, 737–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöyhönen, Pentti (1963a) ‘A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 90, Heft 1, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1963b) ‘Toward a general theory of the international trade’, Economiska Samfundets Tidskrift, vol. 16, 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliainen, Kyosti (1963) ‘A world trade study: an econometric model of the pattern of the commodity flows of international trade in 1948–60’, Economiska Samfundets Tidskrift, vol. 16, 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, James E. (1999) ‘Networks versus markets in international trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 48, 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2001) ‘Business and social networks in international trade’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 39, December, 1177–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, James E., and Vitor Trindade (2002) ‘Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 84, No. 1, February, 116–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravenstein, Ernest G. (1885) ‘The laws of migration: part 1’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 48, 167–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1889) ‘The laws of migration: part 2’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52, 241–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuveny, Rafael, and Heejoon Kang (2003) ‘A simultaneous equations model of trade, conflict, and cooperation’, Review of International Economics, vol. 11, No. 2, May, 279–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Andrew K. (2000) ‘One money, one market: estimating the effect of common currencies trade’, Economic Policy, vol. 30, 7–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos Silva, J.M.C., and Silvana Tenreyro (2006) ‘The log of gravity’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 88, No. 4, 641–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, André (1981) ‘Trade benefits under the EEC Generalized System of Preferences’, European Economic Review, 15, 339–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, I. Richard, and Karl W. Deutsch (1960) ‘A statistical model of the gross analysis of transaction flows’, Econometrica, vol. 28, 551–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, Howard J., and Anthony J. Venables (2000) ‘The geography of international investment’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2338, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Ashish, and Tony E. Smith (1995) Gravity Models of Spatial Interaction Behavior. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, Ben, and John S. Wilson (2007) ‘Trade, infrastructure, and roadways in Europe and Central Asia: new empirical evidence’, Journal of Economic Integration, vol. 22, No. 4, December, 723–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, Kieun (2005) ‘Border effects and FDI: can FDI explain the border puzzle?’ Working Paper, University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Pamela J. (2001) ‘How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses?’ Journal of International Economics, vol. 55, 411–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summary, Rebecca (1989) ‘A political economic model of U.S. bilateral trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, No. 1, February, 179–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Ernesto, and Christian Daude (2007) ‘Longitude matters: time zones and the location of foreign direct investment’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 71, 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, John Q. (1948) ‘Demographic gravitation: evidence and applications’, Sociometry, vol. 11, No. 1/2, February/May, 31–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, Deborah L. (1994) ‘The impact of U.S. tax reform on foreign direct investment in the United States’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 54, No. 2, 243–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, Jerry G., and Marie C. Thursby ‘Bilateral trade flows, the Linder Hypothesis, and exchange risk’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69, No. 3, August, 488–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, Jan (1962) Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beers, Cees (1998) ‘Labour standards and trade flows of OECD countries’, The World Economy, vol. 21, No. 1, January, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bergeijk, Peter, and Harry Oldersma (1990) ‘Detente, market oriented reform, and German unification: potential consequences for the world trade system’, Kyklos, vol. 43, No. 4, 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, Joakim, and Fredrik Wilhelmsson (2009) ‘Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data’, Applied Economics, vol. 41, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeaple, Stephen Ross (2005) ‘A simple model of firm heterogeneity’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 65, No. 1, January, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Jeffrey H. Bergstrand and Peter Egger

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bergstrand, J.H., Egger, P. (2013). Gravity Equations and Economic Frictions in the World Economy. In: Bernhofen, D., Falvey, R., Greenaway, D., Kreickemeier, U. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of International Trade. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30531-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics