Skip to main content

The Political Economy of Regional Integration in East Asia

  • Chapter
The Political Economy of East Asia

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 144 Accesses

Abstract

As a result of Japan’s defeat in World War II, the prewar regional political economy of East Asia within the framework of the Japanese empire was substantially transformed. The postwar political economy of East Asia was initially structured under the aegis of the United States, reflecting the political and economic conditions in the region at the time. As part of its postwar strategy in East Asia, Washington encouraged regional economic integration centered on Japan with noncommunist East and Southeast Asia functioning as a market and source of raw materials for the Japanese economy. The development of postwar economic relations between Japan and other capitalist economies in the region basically proceeded along this line. By the mid-1960s, with the normalization of relations between Japan and South Korea, the East Asian political economy had been solidly resumed. Thereafter, the major market economies in East Asia successively achieved economic miracles with Japan emerging as a new economic superpower and South Korea, Taiwan, and Hong Kong becoming newly industrializing economies. In this process, these economies became increasingly interdependent through growing trade and FDI among them. In the late 1970s,China moved away fromMao’s policy of self-reliance and began to participate in the regional and international economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. OECD, Foreign Direct Investment Relations between the OECD and the Dynamic Asian Economies (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1993), p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. C. Abegglen, Sea Change: Pacific Asia as the New World Industrial Center (New York: The Free Press, 1994), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. J. Lincoln, “Japanese Trade and Investment Issues,” in D. Unger and P. Blackburn (eds), Japan’s Emerging Global Role (Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., 1993), pp. 134–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. G. Cai, “Is a Free Trade Zone Emerging in East Asia in the Wake of the Asian Financial Crisis?” Pacific Affairs, vol. 74, no. 1 (Spring 2001) 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. World Bank, East Asia: The Road to Recovery (Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 1998), p. 11.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. For a thorough discussion of China’s changing attitude and policy toward regional free trade arrangements in East Asia in general and East Asia in particular, see K. G. Cai, “Chinese Changing Perspective on the Development of an East Asian Free Trade Area,” The Review of International Affairs, vol. 3, no. 4 (Summer 2004) 584–99. This article is reprinted in

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. C. Keith (ed.), China as a Rising World Power and its Response to ‘Globalization’ (London and New York: Routledge, 2005), ch. 5, pp. 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a more detailed discussion on the issue of AMF, see R. Higgott, “The Asian Economic Crisis: A Study in the Politics of Resentment,” New Political Economy, vol. 3, no. 3 (November 1998) 340–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ADB, Asian Development Outlook 2002 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See, for example, N. V. Long, “The East Asian Crisis: Some Historical Roots,” New Political Science, vol. 21, no. 3 (1999) 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. G. Cai, “The Political Economy of Economic Regionalism in East Asia: A Unique and Dynamic Pattern,” East Asia: An International Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 2 (Summer 1999) 42–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Ravenhill, “Institutional Evolution at the Trans-Regional Level: APEC and the Promotion of Liberalisation,” in M. Beeson (ed.), Reconfiguring East Asia: Regional Institutions and Organisations After the Crisis (London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2002), p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Webber, “Two Funerals and a Wedding? The Ups and Downs of Regionalism in East Asia and Asia-Pacific after the Asian Crisis,” The Pacific Review, vol. 14, no. 3 (2001) 356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. For a discussion of ASEM, see C. M. Dent, “ASEM and the ‘Cinderella Complex’ of EU-East Asia Economic Relations,” Pacific Affairs, vol. 74, no. 1 (2001) 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. For more discussion on APT and APO, see K. G. Cai, “The ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement and East Asian Regional Grouping,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 25, no. 3 (2003) 392–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Kevin G. Cai

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cai, K.G. (2008). The Political Economy of Regional Integration in East Asia. In: The Political Economy of East Asia. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30522-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics