Skip to main content

A Simple (and Teachable) Macroeconomic Model with Endogenous Money

  • Chapter
Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy

Abstract

According to Romer (2000), the IS-LM framework has outlived its usefulness as the basic model for teaching undergraduate students about short-run macroeconomic fluctuations. This is because central banks no longer use monetary aggregates as the instrument of monetary policy (as per the assumptions of the IS-LM model), but instead conduct policy by manipulating interest rates (see also Blinder 1997; Taylor 1997; Walsh 2002). Romer’s solution to this problem involves replacing the LM curve with an MP (monetary policy) curve that describes how central banks manipulate interest rates in response to macroeconomic outcomes such as variations in inflation and/or the level of real economic activity. The result is what has come to be known as the ‘New Consensus’ model, in which the central bank varies the interest rate in order to anchor the rate of inflation at its chosen target value, while real activity is governed by a natural rate of unemployment or NAIRU.1 Simple and teachable variants of this model have already been developed by, for example, Taylor (2000), Carlin and Soskice (2005), and Jones (2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 130.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blinder, A. S. (1997), ‘What Central Bankers Could Learn from Academics — and Vice Versa’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R. and T. McCurdy (1999), ‘Labor supply: a review of alternative approaches’, in O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, 3A, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1599–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, W. and Soskice, D. (2005), Macroeconomics Imperfections, Institutions, and Policies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1997), ‘Capital income taxes and the benefits of price stability’, NBER Working Paper, no. 6200, September.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, G. (2003), ‘Post Keynesian Approaches to Endogenous Money: A Time Framework Explanation’, Review of Political Economy, 15, 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, G. (2004), ‘Rethinking Endogenous Money: A Constructive Interpretation of the Debate Between Horizontalists and Structuralists’, Metroeconomica, 55, 367–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, G. (2006), ‘Telling better stories in macroeconomic textbooks: monetary policy, endogenous money and aggregate demand’, in Setterfield, M. (ed.) Complexity, Endogenous Money and Macroeconomic Theory: Essays in Honour of Basil J. Moore, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 353–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (2008), Macroeconomics, London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. S. (2001), ‘Issues in inflation targeting’, in Price Stability and the Long-Run target for Monetary Policy, Ottawa: Bank of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. J. (1988), Horizontalists and Verticalists: The Macroeconomics of Credit Money, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palley, T. (1996), Post Keynesian Economics: Debt, Distribution and the Macro Economy, London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rochon, L. P. and M. Setterfield (2007), ‘Interest Rates, Income Distribution and Monetary Policy Dominance: Post-Keynesians and the “Fair Rate” of Interest’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30, 13–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D. (2000), ‘Keynesian Macroeconomics Without the LM Curve’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 149–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. B. (1997), ‘A Core of Practical Macroeconomics’, American Economic Review, 87(2), 233–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. B. (2000), ‘Teaching Macroeconomics at the Principles Level’, American Economic Review, 90 (2), 90–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. E. (2002), ‘Teaching Inflation Targeting: An Analysis for Intermediate Macro’, Journal of Economic Education, 33, 330–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Giuseppe Fontana and Mark Setterfield

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fontana, G., Setterfield, M. (2009). A Simple (and Teachable) Macroeconomic Model with Endogenous Money. In: Fontana, G., Setterfield, M. (eds) Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-29166-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics