Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to consider the implications of treating money as endogenously created within the banking system rather than the more traditional use of the assumption of exogenous money (that is money created by an external agency such as the central bank) for the teaching of macroeconomic analysis and how that teaching could be approached. The underlying view on which this chapter is based is that macroeconomic analysis based on endogenous money has to be substantially different from one based on exogenous money, and the differences are much more fundamental than merely shifting from an assumption that the stock of money is given to the one that the (policy) rate of interest is given (cf. Romer, 2000). With the endogenous money approach, in contrast with the exogenous approach, ‘money matters’ for the level of economic activity and for the evolution of the economy over time2. Expenditure can only take place if it is backed by purchasing power, and expenditure has to be financed through the possession of money, which can come from provision of loans by the banks. The level and composition of expenditure clearly determines what is produced and sold. The decisions on loans by banks influence the number of investment plans that can be financed and which can take place, and thereby the size and character of the capital stock, and hence on the development of the supply side of the economy.
I am grateful to Giuseppe Fontana and Mark Setterfield for their comments and guidance on an earlier draft, and to Philip Arestis and Peter Howells for extensive discussions on the subject matter of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abel, A.B. and Bernanke, B.S. (2005), Macroeconomics, 5th edn, London: Pearson.
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2003), ‘Does the stock of money have any significance?’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, 56(225), 113–36.
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2006), ‘Aggregate demand, conflict and capacity in the inflationary process’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(6), 959–74.
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2007), ‘The nature and role of monetary policy when money is endogenous’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(6), 847–60.
Dernburg, T.F. and McDougall, D.M. (1963), Macro-economics, London: McGraw-Hill.
Friedman, M. (1969), ‘The quantity theory of money: a restatement’, in M. Friedman, The Optimum Quantity of Money and other essays, London: Macmillan, 51–68.
Godley, W. (1999), ‘Money and credit in a Keynesian model of income determination’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 393–411.
Godley, W. and Lavoie, M. (2007), Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production, and Wealth, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lavoie, M. (1992), Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Lavoie, M. (2003), ‘A primer on endogenous credit money’, in Rochon, L.P. and Rossi, S. (eds), Modern Theories of Money, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Romer, D. (2000), ‘Keynesian macroeconomics without the LM curve’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(2), 149–69.
Taylor, J.B. (1993), ‘Discretion versus policy rules in practice’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, North Holland, 39, 159–214.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Malcolm Sawyer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sawyer, M. (2009). Teaching Macroeconomics When the Endogeneity of Money is Taken Seriously. In: Fontana, G., Setterfield, M. (eds) Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-29166-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-29166-9_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-27763-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29166-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)