Abstract
When it comes to economic policy analysis, mainstream macroeconomics today is dominated by New Consensus Models (NCMs).2 In these models aggregate demand impacts on output and employment, but only in the short run. Due to nominal and real rigidities, for which microfoundations based on imperfectly competitive markets are delivered, the short-run Phillips curve is downward sloping. In the long run, however, there is no effect of aggregate demand on the ‘Non Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment’ (NAIRU), which is exclusively determined by structural characteristics of the labour market, wage bargaining institutions and the social benefit system. An inflation-targeting monetary policy using the interest rate is able to stabilize output and employment in the short run, but in the long run it is neutral and only affects inflation (Fontana and Palacio-Vera, 2007). Fiscal policy is downgraded and is restricted to supporting monetary policies in achieving price stability (Arestis and Sawyer, 2003).
This chapter is a revised, simplified and shortened version of Hein and Stockhammer (2007). There, a more formal and extensive treatment of the issues can be found. The major part of this chapter was written while Eckhard Hein was a visiting professor at Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (WU). The hospitality of the WU is gratefully acknowledged. Many thanks go to Giuseppe Fontana and Mark Setterfield for very helpful suggestions to make the chapter more readable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexiou, C. and Pitelis, C. (2003), ‘On capital shortages and European unemployment: a panel data investigation’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 25, 613–31.
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2003), ‘Reinventing fiscal policy’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 26, 3–25.
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2004a), Re-examining Monetary and Fiscal Policy for the 21st Century, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2004b), ‘Monetary policy when money is endogenous: going beyond the “New Consensus”’, in Lavoie, M. and Seccareccia, M. (eds), Central Banking in the Modern World. Alternative Perspectives, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2004c), ‘On fiscal policy and budget deficits’, Intervention. Journal of Economics, 1(2), 61–74.
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2005), ‘Aggregate demand, conflict and capacity in the inflationary process’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 959–74.
Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (2006), ‘The nature and the role of monetary policy when money is endogenous’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 847–60.
Arestis, P., Baddeley, M., and Sawyer, M. (2006), ‘Is capital stock a determinant of unemployment?’, in Hein, E., Heise, A., and Truger, A. (eds), Wages, Employment, Distribution and Growth. International Perspectives, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Arestis, P., Baddeley, M., and Sawyer, M. (2007), ‘The relationship between capital stock, unemployment and wages in nine EMU countries’, Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 59(2), 125–48.
Arestis, P. and Biefang-Frisancho Mariscal, I. (2000), ‘Capital stock, unemployment and wages in the UK and Germany’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47, 487–503.
Atesoglu, H.S. and Smithin, J. (2006), ‘Inflation targeting in a simple macroeconomic model’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 28, 673–88.
Ball, L. (1999), ‘Aggregate demand and long-run unemployment’, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, no. 2, 189–251.
Blanchard, O. and Summers, L.H. (1988), ‘Beyond the natural rate hypothesis’, American Economic Review, 78(2), 182–7.
Carlin, W. and Soskice, D. (2006), Macroeconomics. Imperfections, Institutions and Policies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clarida, R., Galí, J. and Gertler, M. (1999), ‘The science of monetary policy: a New Keynesian perspective’, Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1661–707.
Davidson, P. (2006), ‘Can, or should, a central bank target inflation?’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 28, 689–703.
Fontana, G. (2006), ‘The “New Consensus” view of monetary policy: a new Wicksellian connection’, Intervention. Journal of Economics, 3, 263–78.
Fontana, G. and Palacio-Vera, A. (2007), ‘Are long-run price stability and short-run output stabilization all that monetary policy can aim for?’, Metroeconomica, 58, 269–98.
Hein, E. (2002), ‘Monetary policy and wage bargaining in the EMU: restrictive ECB policies, high unemployment, nominal wage restraint and inflation above the target’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 55, 299–337.
Hein, E. (2006), ‘Wage bargaining and monetary policy in a Kaleckian monetary distribution and growth model: trying to make sense of the NAIRU’, Intervention. Journal of Economics, 3, 305–29.
Hein, E. and Stockhammer, E. (2007), Macroeconomic policy mix, employment and inflation in a Post-Keynesian alternative to the New Consensus model, Department of Economics Working Paper no. 110, Vienna University of Economics & B.A.
Hein, E. (2008), Money, Distribution Conflict and Capital Accumulation. Contributions to ‘Monetary Analysis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hein, E. and Vogel, L. (2008), ‘Distribution and growth reconsidered — empirical results for six OECD countries’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 479–511.
IMF (2003), World Economic Outlook. Growth and Institutions, April, Washington, DC: IMF.
Kaldor, N. (1982), The Scourge of Monetarism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kalecki, M. (1954), Theory of Economic Dynamics, London: George Allen.
Kalecki, M. (1971), Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy, 1933–70, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kriesler, P. and Lavoie, M. (2007), ‘The New Consensus on monetary policy and its Post-Keynesian critique’, Review of Political Economy, 19, 387–404.
Lavoie, M. (1992), Foundations of Post Keynesian Economic Analysis, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Lavoie, M. (1995), ‘Interest rates in post-Keynesian models of growth and distribution’, Metroeconomica, 46, 146–77.
Lavoie, M. (1996a), ‘Monetary policy in an economy with endogenous credit money’, in Deleplace, G. and Nell, E. (eds), Money in Motion, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Lavoie, M. (1996b), ‘Horizontalism, structuralism, liquidity preference and the principle of increasing risk’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 43, 275–300.
Lavoie, M. (2006), ‘A Post-Keynesian amendment to the New Consensus on monetary policy’, Metroeconomica, 57, 165–92.
Logeay, C. and Tober, S. (2006), ‘Hysteresis and the NAIRU in the Euro area’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53, 409–29.
Moore, B.J. (1989), ‘The endogeneity of credit money’, Review of Political Economy, 1, 65–93.
Naastepad, C.W.M. and Storm, S.(2007), ‘OECD demand regimes (1960–2000)’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 29, 211–46.
Palacio-Vera, A. (2005), ‘The “modern” view of macroeconomics: some critical reflections’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 747–67.
Palacio-Vera, A., Martínez-Cañete, A. R., Márquez de la Cruz, E., and Pérez-Soba Aguilar, I. (2006), Capital Stock and Unemployment: Searching for the Missing Link, Working Paper no. 475, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
Palley, T. (2007), ‘Macroeconomics and monetary policy: competing theoretical frameworks’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30, 61–78.
Pasinetti, L. (1974), Growth and Income Distribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pasinetti, L. (1981), Structural Change and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pivetti, M. (1991), An Essay on Money and Distribution, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Rochon, L.-P. and Setterfield, M. (2007), ‘Interest rates, income distribution and monetary dominance: Post-Keynesians and the “fair rate” of interest’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30, 13–42.
Rowthorn, R.E. (1995), ‘Capital formation and unemployment’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 11(1), 26–39.
Rowthorn, R.E. (1999), ‘Unemployment, wage bargaining and capital-labour substitution’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 413–25.
Sawyer, M. (2002), ‘The NAIRU, aggregate demand and investment’, Metroeconomica, 53, 66–94.
Sawyer, M. (2006), ‘Inflation targeting and central bank independence: we are all Keynesians now! Or are we?’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 28, 639–52.
Seccareccia, M. (1998), ‘Wicksellian norm, central bank real interest targeting and macroeconomic performance’, in Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (eds), The Political Economy of Central Banking, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Setterfield, M. (2004), ‘Central banking, stability and macroeconomic outcomes: a comparison of New Consensus and Post-Keynesian monetary macroeconomics’, in Lavoie, M. and Seccareccia, M. (eds), Central Banking in the Modern World. Alternative Perspectives, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Setterfield, M. (2006a), ‘Is inflation targeting compatible with Post Keynesian economics?’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 28, 653–71.
Setterfield, M. (2006b), Macroeconomics Without the LM Curve: An Alternative View, Paper presented at the 9th Post Keynesian Conference 2006, Kansas City.
Smithin, J. (2007), ‘A real interest rate rule for monetary policy?’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30, 101–18.
Sraffa, P. (1960), Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stanley, T.D. (2004), ‘Does unemployment hysteresis falsify the natural rate hypothesis? A meta-regression analysis’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 18, 589–612.
Stockhammer, E. (2004), ‘Is there an equilibrium rate of unemployment in the long run?’, Review of Political Economy, 16, 59–77.
Stockhammer, E. (2008), ‘Is the NAIRU a Monetarist, New Keynesian, Post Keynesian or Marxist theory?’, Metroeconomica, 59, 479–510.
Stockhammer, E., Hein, E. and Grafl, L. (2007), Globalization and the effects of changes in functional income distribution on aggregate demand in Germany, Department of Economics Working Paper no. 114, Vienna University of Economics & B.A.
Stockhammer, E., Onaran, Ö, and Ederer, S. (2009), ‘Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro area’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 139–59.
Wray, L.R. (2007), ‘A Post Keynesian view of central bank independence, policy targets, and the rules versus discretion debate’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30, 119–41.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Eckhard Hein and Engelbert Stockhammer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hein, E., Stockhammer, E. (2009). A Post Keynesian Alternative to the New Consensus Model. In: Fontana, G., Setterfield, M. (eds) Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-29166-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-29166-9_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-27763-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29166-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)