Advertisement

The United Kingdom Adapting to the European Union within a transformed world

  • David Allen
Part of the Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations book series (SID)

Abstract

The current structure and role of the FCO reflects a cumulative adjustment to change over a considerable period of time, although the pace of that change has quickened since Britain became a member of the European Union. In the last decade alone, the FCO has been faced with major international changes — the collapse of communism in Europe, the end of the Cold War international system, the widening and deepening of the European Union and the disintegration of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia — as well as a major domestic change — the election of a Labour Government in May of 1997, after a prolonged eighteen-year period of successive Conservative administrations.

Keywords

Foreign Policy Financial Time Public Diplomacy Downing Street Domestic Ministry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    See in particular; William Wallace (ed.) The Foreign Policy Process in Britain, (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1975)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    John Dickie, Inside the Foreign Office, (London: Chapmans, 1992)Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Michael Clarke, British External Policy-Making in the 1990s, (London: Macmillan for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 2.
    Simon Jenkins and Anne Sloman, With Respect, Ambassador: An inquiry into the Foreign Office, (London: BBC, 1985)Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    Ruth Dudley Edwards, True Brits: Inside the British Foreign Office, (London: BBC Books, 1994)Google Scholar
  6. 2.
    Laurence Martin and John Garnett, British Foreign Policy; Challenges and Choices for the 21st Century (London: Royal Institute for International Affairs/Pinter, 1997)Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    Martin Smith reports that the FCO was ‘thought by many to have had a new lease of life from membership (of the EU) after the shock of the decline of Empire’, Martin J Smith, The Core Executive in Britain (London: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1999) p. 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 5.
    Speech at Chatham House, London, 5 April 1995 cited in Hugo Young, This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair (London: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1998) p. 485.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    Rupert Cornwall, ‘Is being the Foreign Secretary still the best job in the Cabinet?’, The Independent, 19 March 1998Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    Lionel Barber, ‘Move over, Metternich’, Financial Times, 16 July 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Central Policy Review Staff, Review of Overseas Representation (London: HMSO, 1977).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    For an analysis of Mrs Thatcher’s role in foreign policy-making see in particular Christopher Hill, ‘United Kingdom: Sharpening contradictions’ in Christopher Hill (ed.) The Actors in Europe’s Foreign Policy (London: Routledge, 1996) pp. 71–7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Percy Craddock, In Pursuit of British Interests: Reflections on Foreign Policy under Margaret Thatcher and John Major (London: John Murray, 1997).Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Robert Preston and George Parker, ‘Cabinet Office to keep role as independent mediator’, Financial Times, 21 April, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    Andrew Parker ‘Cook moves to cut costs at Foreign Office’, Financial Times, 5 February 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 22.
    Peter Hain, The End of Foreign Policy? British Interests, Global Linkages and National Limits (London: Fabian Society, Green Alliance and Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2001).Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Nicholas Watt, ‘Hain seeks to end “nationalist” line on foreign policy’, Guardian, 23 January 2001.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    Peter Hennessy, The Hidden Wiring: Unearthing the British Constitution (London: Victor Gollancz, 1995) p. 251.Google Scholar
  19. 27.
    Lawrence Freedman, ‘The case of Westland and the bias to Europe’, International Affairs 63(1) Winter 1986–87, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 29.
    Andrew Schonfield, ‘The Duncan Report and its Critics’, International Affairs, April 1970, pp. 247–68.Google Scholar
  21. 30.
    Central Policy Review Staff, Review of Overseas Representation (London: HMSO, 1977).Google Scholar
  22. 31.
    Nicholas Henderson, Mandarin: The Diaries of an Ambassador, 1969–1982 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1994) p. 126.Google Scholar
  23. 33.
    For a general discussion of these issues see David Spence, The Role of British Civil Seyants in European Lobbying: the British Case’, in Sonia Mazey and Jeremy Richardson (eds) Lobbying in the European Community’ (London: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
  24. 33.
    Brian Bender, ‘Governmental Processes: Whitehall, Central Government and 1992’, Public Policy and Administration, 6, 1991, pp. 13–29: Alisdair Blair, ‘UK Policy Coordination during the 1990–91 Intergovernmental Conference’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, 9(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 34.
    See Donald Macintyre, ‘Making Europe more democratic will also make it too powerful’, The Independent, 19 March 1999.Google Scholar
  26. 37.
    Alisdair Blair, ‘UK Policy Coordination during the 1990–91 Intergovernmental Conference’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, 9 (2) July 1998, pp. 159–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 40.
    Mark Nicholson, ‘Edinburgh moves closer to European regions’, Financial Times, 5 December 2000.Google Scholar
  28. 47.
    Bruce Clark, ‘Women fill more than half the top diplomatic posts’ Financial Times, 25 March 1996. See also Ruth Dudley Edwards, True Brits, Chapter 6, pp. 97–108.Google Scholar
  29. 48.
    Robert Mauthner, ‘Diplomatic Disquiet’, Financial Times, 24 January 1994.Google Scholar
  30. 49.
    Richard Norton-Taylor, ‘Cook paves way for more mothers as top diplomats’, Guardian, 11 August 1998.Google Scholar
  31. 50.
    David Buchan, ‘FO to spend £56m on technology upgrade’, Financial Times, 28 November 1998Google Scholar
  32. 50.
    Caroline Daniel, ‘Whitehall logs on to electronic diplomacy’, Financial Times, 13 May 2000.Google Scholar
  33. 51.
    See Dan Jellinek, ‘Civil Surfers’, Guardian, 30 October 1997.Google Scholar
  34. 52.
    See Charles Carstairs and Richard Ware (eds) Parliament and International Relations, (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991) pp. 86–8.Google Scholar
  35. 53.
    See John Tusa, ‘A Dismal Volte-Face’, The Observer, 17 January 1999.Google Scholar
  36. 54.
    David Howell, ‘Britannia’s business’ Prospect, 15 January 1997, pp. 26–9.Google Scholar
  37. 57.
    Andrew Parker, ‘Cook seeks more Foreign office-industry ties’, Financial Times, 3 November 1998Google Scholar
  38. 57.
    David Buchan, ‘Embassies import help from the private sector to boost exports’, Financial Times, 15 February 1999.Google Scholar
  39. 58.
    Hugh Williamson, ‘Foreign Office may boost secondee scheme’, Financial Times, 28 June 2000.Google Scholar
  40. 59.
    Paul Brown and Ewan MacAskill, ‘BNFL pays to put own man in Tokyo embassy’, Guardian, 8 March 2000.Google Scholar
  41. 60.
    Andrew Parker, ‘A bright light to illuminate us all on European policy’, Financial Times, 6 July 1998.Google Scholar
  42. 62.
    See Philip Stephens, ‘Wrapped in a bigger map’, Financial Times, 24 March 1995Google Scholar
  43. 62.
    Martin Woolacott, ‘Jilted Britain looks for a new special relationship’, Guardian, 22 March 1995Google Scholar
  44. 62.
    Hugo Young, ‘There is a role elsewhere — but not without Europe’, Guardian, 30 March 1995Google Scholar
  45. 62.
    Ian Davidson, ‘A place in the world’, Financial Times, 29 March 1995.Google Scholar
  46. 63.
    Leyla Boulton, ‘Cook pledges move to “green” Foreign Office’, Financial Times, 27 February 1996.Google Scholar
  47. 64.
    John Kamfner, ‘Government to pledge “moral” foreign policy’, Financial Times, 12 May 1997Google Scholar
  48. 64.
    but see also Richard Norton-Taylor, ‘Ethical arms policy in Disarray’, Guardian, 24 June 1998.Google Scholar
  49. 66.
    This policy of emphasising the concept of a People’s Europe’ is critically evaluated by Peter Ludlow in his appraisal of the 1998 UK Presidency, see Peter Ludlow, ‘The 1998 UK Presidency: A View from Brussels’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(4), December 1998, pp. 573–83 but especially pp. 580–1. For a less critical view of the same UK Presidency see the article by Douglas Henderson on the same edition of the JCMS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 67.
    See Andrew Parker, ‘Think-tank to redefine “ethical” foreign policy’, Financial Times, 3 March 1999Google Scholar
  51. 67.
    Mark Leonard, ‘In the national interest’, Financial Times, 3 March 1999.Google Scholar
  52. 68.
    Stephen Castle, ‘Cook opens up a rival to Foreign Office’, Independent on Sunday, 1 March 1998.Google Scholar
  53. 69.
    John Kampfner, ‘Mandarins face scrutiny from Labour on Europe’, Financial Times, 31 January 1997.Google Scholar
  54. 70.
    Mark Turner, ‘Unscrambling the scramble for Africa’, Financial Times, 10 March 1999Google Scholar
  55. 70.
    Quentin Peel, ‘White man’s burden sharing’, Financial Times, 11 March 1999Google Scholar
  56. 70.
    Rupert Cornwall, ‘New entente cordiale as Africa is unscrambled’, The Independent, 12 March 1999.Google Scholar
  57. 71.
    See David Allen, ‘Who Speaks for Europe: The search for an effective and coherent external policy’ in John Peterson and Helene Sjursen (eds), A Common Foreign Policy for Europe?: Competing Visions of CFSP (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
  58. 72.
    David Buchan, ‘Cook to propose EU foreign policy committee’, Financial Times, 13 March 1999.Google Scholar
  59. 73.
    John Kampfner, ‘Call to share consular tasks’, Financial Times, 2 February 1998.Google Scholar
  60. 74.
    See Jon Hibbs, ‘Cook revitalises Foreign Office with a magic wand’, The Daily Telegraph, 16 July 1998.Google Scholar
  61. 75.
    Martin Bright, James Meek and Andy McSmith, ‘Our man in Moscow’s £80 million folly, Observer, 14 June 1998Google Scholar
  62. 75.
    Andrew Parker, ‘Foreign office wins fight on diplomats’ allowances’ and ’A fairer deal’, Financial Times, 9 December 1998.Google Scholar
  63. 76.
    Ian Black, ‘Cook to recruit 200 envoys in fight for global markets’, Guardian, 28 November 1998.Google Scholar
  64. 77.
    Tom Baldwin, ‘Cook declares trade war on Mandelson’, Daily Telegraph, 11 October 1998.Google Scholar
  65. 78.
    See Andrew Parker, ‘Ambassador to head trade body’, Financial Times, 12 March 1999.Google Scholar
  66. 80.
    See John Kampfner and Bernard Gray, ‘Cook makes pledge on human rights’, Financial Times, 13 May 1997.Google Scholar
  67. 81.
    Ewan MacAskill, ‘Hain backtracks on ethical foreign policy’, Guardian, 31 March 2000.Google Scholar
  68. 82.
    Andrew Parker and Jimmy Burns, ‘MP’s criticise weaknesses of “ethical” foreign policy’, Financial Times, 13 February 2000Google Scholar
  69. 82.
    Vikram Dood and Ewen MacAskill, ‘Labour drops “ethical” tag’, Guardian, 4 September 2000.Google Scholar
  70. 84.
    Robert Preston, ‘UK aims to take leading role at heart of Europe’, Financial Times, 2 October 1998.Google Scholar
  71. 85.
    Martin Walker, ‘The white race in arms?’, Guardian, 27 October 1998, p. 19.Google Scholar
  72. 86.
    See Robert Preston, ‘Cook finds European haven as squalls loom on economic front’, Financial Times, 27 August 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Allen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations