Advertisement

Policies in Early Childhood Education and Care: Potentialities for Agency, Play and Learning

  • Gunilla Dahlberg

Abstract

In recent years the institutionalization of childhood has accelerated dramatically, resulting in the rapid expansion of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). Consequently, as lifelong learning increasingly begins with the very young, ECEC is moving with comparable speed up the policy agenda of nation states, as well as within different international organizations, including the European Commission, the OECD, the World Bank and UNESCO.

Keywords

Early Childhood Lifelong Learning Daycare Center Early Childhood Curriculum Liberal Welfare State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bloch, M.N. (1992) ‘Critical Perspectives on the Historical Relationship between Child Development and Early Childhood Education Research’, in S. Kessler and B.B. Swadener (eds) Reconceptualizing the Early Childhood Curriculum: Beginning the Dialogue. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, John (2005) ‘Curriculum Issues in National Policy-Making’, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(2) 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brembeck, H.B., B. Johansson and J. Kampmann. (2004) Beyond the Competent Child. Exploring Contemporary Childhoods in the Nordic Welfare States. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burman, E. (1994) Deconstructing Developmental Psychology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cannella, G. (1997) Deconstructing Early Childhood Education. Social Justice and Revolution. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  6. Corsaro, W.A. (2003) We’re Friends, Right? Inside Kids Culture. Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  7. Corsaro, W.A. (2005) The Sociology of Childhood, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  8. Corsaro, W.A. and L. Molinari. (2005) I Compagni: Understanding Children’s Transition from Preschool to Elementary School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dahlberg, G., P. Moss and A. Pence. (2007) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education. Languages of Evaluation, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Dahlberg, G. and P. Moss. (2005) Ethics and Politics in Early Childhood Education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, B. (1989) Frogs and Snails and Feminist Tales: Preschool Children and Gender. Sydney: Allen & Unwin PTY Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G. (1992) ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’, October, 59, 3–7.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G. (1997) Essays Critical and Clinical. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  15. Esping-Andersen, G. (1995) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fendler, L. (2001) ‘Educating Flexible Souls: The Construction of Subjectivity through Developmentality and Interaction’, in K. Hultqvist and G. Dahlberg (eds) Governing the Child in the New Millennium, New York: Routledge, pp. 119–143.Google Scholar
  17. James, A., C. Jenks and A. Prout. (1998) Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lenz Taguchi, H. (2000) Emancipation och motstånd. Dokumentation och kooperativa läroprocesser i förskolan. (Emancipation and Resistance. Documentation and cooperative learning-processes in preschool). Doctorial dissertation. Stockholm: HLS-Förlag.Google Scholar
  19. Lind, U. (2005) ‘Identity and Power, “Meaning, Gender and Age”. Children’s Creative Work as a Signifying Practice’, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(3): 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Löfdahl, A. (2002) Förskolebarns lek — en arena för kulturellt och socialt meningsskapande. (Preschool Children’s Play — an Arena for Cultural and Social Construction of Meaning). Karlstad University Studies, 2002: 28.Google Scholar
  21. Lubeck, S. (1994) ‘Is Developmentally Appropriate Practice for Everyone?’ Early Education and Development, 2(2): 168–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mac Naughton, G. (2005) Doing Foucault in Early Childhood Studies. Applying Poststructural Ideas. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. New, R. (1993) ‘Italy’, in M. Cochran (ed.) International Handbook of Child Care Policies and Programs. Westport: The Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  24. Nordin-Hultman, E. (2004) Pedagogiska miljöer och barns subjektskapande. (Pedagogical Environments and Children´s Construction of Subjectivity). Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  25. OECD (2001) Starting Strong I. Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  26. OECD (2006) Starting Strong II. Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  27. Olsson, L. (2009) Movement and Experimentation in Young Childrens’ Learning: Deleuze and Guattari in Early Childhood Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Polakow, V. (2007) Who Cares for Our Children? the Child Care Crisis in the Other America. New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  29. Popkewitz, T.S. (2003) ‘Governing the Child and Pedagogicalization of the Parent. A Historical Excursus into the Present’, in M.N. Bloch, K. Holmlund, I. Moqvist and T. S. Popkewitz (eds) Governing Children, Families and Education. Restructuring Welfare. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Project Zero and Reggio Children (2001) Making Learning Visible. Children as Individual and Group Learners. Reggio Emilia: Reggio Children.Google Scholar
  31. Rinaldi, C. (2006) In Dialogue with Reggio Emilia. Listening, Researching and Learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schweinhart, L.J. and D.P. Weikart. (1997) Lasting Differences: The High/Scope Preschool Curriculum Comparison Study through Age 23. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.Google Scholar
  34. Strandell, H. (1994) Sociala mötesplatser för barn. Aktivitetsnivåer och förhandlingskulturer på daghem. (Social Places of Encounter for Children. Levels of Activity and Cultures of Negotiation in Day-Care-Centers). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
  35. Strandell, H. (1997) ‘Doing Reality with Play: Play as a Children’s Resource in Organizing Everyday Life in Daycare Centers’, Childhood, 4(4): 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sylva, K. and J. Wiltshire. (1993) ‘The Impact of Early Learning on Children’s Later Development’, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 1(1) 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor, A. and C. Richardsson. (2005) ‘Queering Home Corner’, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(2) 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weikart, D. (2000) Early Childhood Education: Need and Opportunity. UNESCO: Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gunilla Dahlberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gunilla Dahlberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations