Abstract

The study of male homosexuality in late Victorian and early twentieth-century Britain has received considerable attention in recent decades, though research of historical evidence is far from exhaustive. The problems facing the historian in this field are greater than the addition of new evidence to the historical lexicon. There are significant intellectual disagreements to contend with. In part, these contentious debates are symptomatic of the tensions arising between academic disciplines regarding their own traditions of approach to the ‘subject’ of the male homosexual. The notion that sexuality and homosexuality in particular were subjects within the remit of the historian has only gained credibility in the last 30 years. Much of the historiography in this field challenges the long-standing claims of disciplines such as sex psychology and the genetic sciences that sexuality belongs exclusively to the realm of scientific enquiry. However, the methodological and ideological approaches adopted by many historians engaging with sexual identity formations in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries make many of the studies in this field highly problematic as works of historical writing.

Keywords

Europe Nism Clarification Reformer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Weeks, J, 2000 Making Sexual History, Polity Press, Cambridge, p. 1.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    McIntosh, M, The Homosexual Role’, in Social Problems, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1968, p. 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 6.
    Kutchins, H, and Kirk, S, 1999, Making Us Crazy: DSM — the Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders, Constable, London, p. 57.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Weeks, J, ‘The Construction of Homosexuality’, in Seidman, S (ed.), 1996, Queer Theory/Sociology, Blackwell, London, p. 44.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Foucault, M, 1978, The History of Sexuality Volume I: The Will to Knowledge, Penguin, London, p. 101.Google Scholar
  6. 18.
    Halperin, D, ‘Sex before Sexuality: Pederasty, Politics and Power in Classical Athens’, in Duberman, M, Vicinus, M and Chauncey, G (eds), 1989, Hidden from History: Reclaiming the Gay and Lesbian Past, Penguin, London, p. 39.Google Scholar
  7. 24.
    Chauncey, G, 1995, Gay New York: The Making of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940, Flamingo, London, p. 12.Google Scholar
  8. 25.
    See Barber, S, and Clark, D, 2002, Regarding Sedgwick: Essays on Queer Culture and Critical Theory, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  9. 26.
    See Cocks, H, 2003, Nameless Offences: Homosexual Desire in the Nineteenth Century, I. B. Taurus, London. See also Cook, M, London and the Culture of Homosexuality, CUP, Cambridge, for contemporary analysis, languages and locations of ‘the closet’ in late nineteenth-century London.Google Scholar
  10. 28.
    Nottingham, C, 1999, The Pursuit of Serenity: Havelock Ellis and the New Politics, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, NL, pp. 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 29.
    Weeks, J, 1981, Sex, Politics and Society: the Regulation of Sexuality since 1800, Longman, London, p. 107 and elsewhere. Also Weeks, J, 1995 and Weeks, J, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 30.
    Oosterhuis, H, 2000, Stepchildren of Nature: Krafft-Ebbing, Psychiatry, and the Making of Sexual Identity, University of Chicago Press, London, Frontispiece.Google Scholar
  13. 42.
    See Symonds, J, 1896, ‘A Problem in Modern Ethics’, Privately Printed and Grosskurth, P (ed.), 1986, The Memoirs of John Addington Symonds, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  14. 43.
    Porter, R and Hall, L, 1995, The Facts of Life: The Creation of Sexual Knowledge in Britain, 1650–1950, Yale University Press, London, p. 163.Google Scholar
  15. 46.
    Davis, N, ’“Women’s History” in Transition: the European Case’, in Feminist Studies, No. 3, 1975, p. 90.Google Scholar
  16. 49.
    Connell, R, 2000, The Men and the Boys, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 23–31.Google Scholar
  17. 50.
    Cocks, H, 1998, The Sodomy Trial in English Culture, 1780–1889, University of Manchester Unpublished Thesis, p. 251.Google Scholar
  18. 53.
    See Sedgwick, E, 1994, Epistimology of the Closet, Penguin, London;Google Scholar
  19. Seidman, S (ed.), 1996, Queer Theory/SociologyGoogle Scholar
  20. Sullivan, N, 2003, A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  21. 54.
    Clark, A, 1997, The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the Making of the British Working Class, University of California Press, London, p. 225.Google Scholar
  22. 56.
    See Tosh, J, 2004, ‘Hegemonic Masculinity and the History of Gender’, in Dudink, S, Hagemann, K and Tosh, J (eds), 2004, Masculinity in Politics and War, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  23. 60.
    Sinah, M, 1995, Colonial Masculinity: The Manly Englishman and the Effeminate Bengali in the Late Nineteenth Century, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sean Brady 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sean Brady

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations