Abstract
The Labour government embraced the report wholeheartedly. The New Zealand Medical Journal reported within two weeks of its publication that the government intended to implement the recommendations that directly concerned the agencies under its control and follow up those directed at other parties.1 This included restructuring ethical committees, setting up a patient advocate and health commissioner system to protect patients’ rights, developing consent procedures, improving medical teaching and initiating a national screening programme.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Wendy Savage, A Savage Inquiry: Who Controls Childbirth, Virago, London, 1986; see also Jo Murphy-Lawless, Reading Birth and Death, Cork University Press, Cork, 1998, p. 197, fn.
Melva Firth, Letter to the Editor, Auckland Star, 27 September 1988.
Anna Watson, Letter to the Editor, Auckland Star, 26 September 1988.
W. Llewellyn, Letter to the Editor, Auckland Star, 30 September 1988.
New Zealand Ministry of Health, A Brief Narrative on Maori Women and the National Cervical Screening Programme, Ministry of Health, Wellington, 1997, pp. 15–16.
Joan Austoker, Editorial, ‘Gaining Informed Consent of Screening,’ BMJ, vol. 19, 1999, pp. 722–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Linda Bryder
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bryder, L. (2010). New World, Better World? Implementing Cartwright. In: Women’s Bodies and Medical Science. Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-25110-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-25110-6_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58915-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25110-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)