Advertisement

Families, Social Change and Diversity

Chapter
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter, alongside the previous one by Christine Skinner, aims to provide a wider context for the remainder of the book. Skinner has already outlined the current policy context in which social workers are operating, and we situate these developments in some competing theoretical explanations about the ‘changes’ occurring in contemporary UK households. We also aim to complement the policy perspective by locating developments in the context of family and demographic change.

Keywords

Domestic Violence Child Protection Dependent Child Household Structure Social Work Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beishon, S., Madood, T., Virdee, S. (1998) Ethnic Minority Families. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Boateng, P. (1999) Today Programme, Radio 4, 14 May.Google Scholar
  4. Burgess, A. (1996) Fatherhood Reclaimed. London: n. p.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, B. (1988) Unofficial Secrets. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  6. Cawson, P., Wattam, C., Brooker, S. and Kelly, G. (2000) Facing the Facts: The Prevalence of Child Maltreatment in the United Kingdom. London: NSPCC.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, L., Colclough, L. and Featherstone, B. (forthcomig) Listening to Mothers of Sexually Abused Children. Google Scholar
  8. Department for Education and Employment (1998) Meeting the Childcare Challenge. London: TSO.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Health (1995) Child Protection — Messages From Research. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  10. Exploring Parenthood (1997) Moyenda: Black Families Talking — family survival strategies. London: Exploring Families.Google Scholar
  11. Etzioni, A. (1993) The Parenting Deficit. London: DemosGoogle Scholar
  12. Family Policy Studies Centre (2000) Family Change: Guide to the Issues, Family Briefing Paper12. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
  13. Featherstone, B. (1997) ‘Introduction: crisis in the Western family’ in Hollway, W. and Featherstone, B. (eds) Mothering and Ambivalence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson, H. (2000) ‘Social Work, Individualization and Life Politics’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 31, pp. 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ford, R., Millar, J. (1997) ‘Private Lives and Public Responses: lone parenthood and future policy’ Foundations, July.Google Scholar
  16. Frazer, E. (1999) ‘Unpicking political communitarianism: A critique of the communitanian family’ in Jagger, G. and Wright, C. (eds) Changing Family Values. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in modem societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Giddens, A. (1999) The Reith Lectures: ‘Family’, http://www.bbc.co.uk.
  20. Giddens, A. (2001) The Third Way and its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gregg, P., Harkness, S., Machin, S. (I 999) ‘Child poverty and its consequences’, Findings, March, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Hill, M. and Jenkins, S. (1999) Poverty Among British Children, Working Paper 99–23, University of Essex.Google Scholar
  23. Home Office (1998) Supporting Families. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  24. Joseph Rowntree Foundation (1999) Monitoring Poverty. Google Scholar
  25. MacLeod, M. (2000) Opening Address, Centre for Care, Values and Welfare, Leeds, 12 May.Google Scholar
  26. Office of National Statistics (2000) Social Inequalities,. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  27. Office of National Statistics (2000) Social Trends. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  28. Phoenix, A. (1996) ‘Social constructions of lone motherhood: a case of competing discourses’ in Silva, E. (ed.) Good Enough Mothering: Feminist Perspectives on Lone Motherhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Ryan, M. (2000) Working with Fathers. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.Google Scholar
  30. Smart, C. and Neale, B. (1999) Family Fragments? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Scourfield, J. (2001) ‘Constructing Women in Child Protection Work’, Child and Family Social Work, 6, 1, pp. 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stacey, J. (1999) ‘Virtual social science and the politics of family values in the United States’, in Jagger, G. and Wright, C. (eds) Changing Family Values. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. The Lord Chancellor’s Department (1999) Report by the Advisory Board on Family Law: Children Act Sub Committee. The Women’s Unit: Working Women at the heart of Government, http/www.womens-unit.gov.uk
  34. Utting, D. et al. (1993) Crime and the Family. London: FPSC.Google Scholar
  35. Woodward, W. (2000) ‘Are we turning into a nation of loners?’, Guardian, 27 March.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nick Frost and Brid Featherstone 2003

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations