Working with Families who Neglect their Children



Current knowledge relating to child neglect points to the existence of a rather absurd paradox. On the one hand, child neglect has consistently been shown to have a markedly higher incidence rate than either physical or sexual abuse, and furthermore has been found to result in more profound developmental deficit than other forms of child maltreatment. On the other hand, however, child neglect is the most understudied and consequently the least understood type of child maltreatment. Given that so many children experience neglect of one sort or another, and that its outcomes can be profoundly harmful, there is an urgent requirement for practitioners and the decision-making forums to re-evaluate current practices and policies in relation to neglected children.


Sexual Abuse Child Abuse Child Welfare Family Support Attachment Style 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allweis, M. (1999) Neglect and AssessmentA Judicial Perspective. Conference Paper, Rochdale Area Child Protection Committee.Google Scholar
  2. Christensen, E. (1999) ‘The Prevalence and Nature of Abuse and Neglect in Children under Four: A National Survey’, Child Abuse Review, vol. 8, pp. 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Panfilis, D. and Salas, M. K. (1992) A Co-ordinated Response to Child Abuse and Neglect: A Basic Manual. US Department of Health and Human Services, DHHS Publications no. (ACF) 92–30362, pp. 1–66.Google Scholar
  4. Department of Health (DoH) (1999) Working Together to Safeguard Children. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  5. Doyle, C. (1997) ‘Emotional Abuse of Children: Issues for Intervention’, Child Abuse Review, vol. 6, pp. 330–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckenrode, J., Laird, M. and Doris, J. (1993) ‘School Performance and Disciplinary Problems Among Abused and Neglected Children’, Developmental Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Egeland, B. (1991) ‘A Longitudinal Study of High-Risk Families: Issues and Findings’, in R. H. Starr and D. A. Wolfe (eds), The Effects of Child Abuse and Neglect: Issues and Research. New York: Guilford, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
  8. Egeland, B., Sroufe, L. A. and Erickson, M. (1983) ‘The Developmental Consequences of Different Patterns of Maltreatment’, Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 7, pp. 459–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. English, D. J. (1998) ‘The Extent and Consequences of Child Maltreatment’, The Future of Children, vol. 8(1), pp. 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erickson, M. and Egeland, B. (1996) ‘Child Neglect’, in APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, ed. J. Brier, L. Berliner, J. A. Buckley, C. Jenny and T. Reid. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage, pp. 4–20.Google Scholar
  11. Fogarty, J. (1993) Protective Services for Children in Victoria: A Report by Mr Justice Fogarty. Health and Community Services Victoria, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  12. Gauthier, L., Stollak, G., Messe, L. and Aronoff, J. (1996) ‘Recall of Childhood Neglect and Physical Abuse as Differential Predictors of Current Psychological Functioning’, Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 20(7), pp. 549–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaser, D. and Prior, V. (1997) ‘Is the Term Child Protection Applicable to Emotional Abuse?’, Child Abuse Review, vol. 6, pp. 315–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iwaniec, D. (1995) The Emotionally Abused and Neglected Child: Identification, Assessment and Intervention. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. — (1997) ‘Evaluating Parent Training for Emotionally Abusive and Neglectful Parents: Comparing Individual Versus Individual and Group Intervention’, Research on Social Work Practice, vol. 7(3), 329–49.Google Scholar
  16. — (2000) ‘From Childhood to Adulthood: The Outcomes of a Twenty-Year Followup of Children who Failed to Thrive’, in D. Iwaniec and M. Hill (eds), Child Welfare, Policy and Practice: Issues and Lessons Emerging from Current Research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. — (2000) ‘Issues Emerging from Child Care Research: Post-Implementation of the Children Act 1989’, in D. Iwaniec and M. Hill (eds), Child Welfare, Policy and Practice: Issues and Lessons Emerging from Current Research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Iwaniec, D. and Sneddon, H. (2001) ‘Attachment Style in Adults who Failed-to-Thrive as Children: Outcomes of a 20-Year Follow-up Study of Factors Influencing Maintenance or Change in Attachment Style’, The British Journal of Social Work, vol. 31(2), pp. 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCord, J. (1983) ‘A Forty Year Perspective on Effects of Child Abuse and Neglect’, Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 7, pp. 265–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Main, M. and Goldwyn, R. (1984) ‘Predicting Rejection of Her Infant from Mother’sGoogle Scholar
  21. Representation of Her Own Experience. Implications for the Abused-Abusing Intergenerational Cycle’, Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 8, 203–17.Google Scholar
  22. Maslow, A.H. (1970) Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  23. Minty, B. and Pattinson, G. (1994) ‘The Nature of Child Neglect’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 24, pp. 733–47.Google Scholar
  24. Ney, P. G., Fung, T. and Wickett, A. R. (1994) ‘The Worst Combinations of Child Abuse and Neglect’, Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 18, pp. 705–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oliver, J.E. and Buchanan, A. H. (1979) ‘Generations of Maltreated Children and Multi-Agency Care in One Kindred’, British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 135, pp. 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pinkerton, J., Higgins, K., and Devine, P. (2000) Family Support, Linking Project Evaluation to Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  27. Polansky, N. (1992) ‘Family Radicals’, Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 14(1/2), pp. 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rose, S. J. and Meezan, W. (1993) ‘Defining Child Neglect: Evolution, Influences, and Issues’, Social Services Review, vol. 67, 279–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sroufe, L. A. and Fleeson, J. (1986) ‘Attachment and the Construction of Relationships’, in W. W. Hartup and Z. Rubin (eds), Relationships and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Stevenson, O. (1996) ‘Emotional Abuse and Neglect: A Time for Reappraisal’, Children and Family Social Work, 1, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. — (1998) Neglected Children: Issues and Dilemmas. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  32. Stone, B. (1998) ‘Child Neglect: Practitioners’ Perspectives’, Child Abuse Review, vol. 7, pp. 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Urquiza, A. J. and Winn, C. (1992) Treatment for Abused and Neglected Children: Infancy to Age18, US Department of Health and Human Services. The Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information, pp. 1–131.Google Scholar
  34. Wilding, J. and Thoburn, J. (1997) ‘Family Support Plans for Neglected and Emotionally Maltreated Children’, Child Abuse Review, vol. 6, pp. 343–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuravin, S.J. (1999) ‘Child Neglect: A Review of Definitions and Measurement Research’, in H. Dubowitz (ed.), Neglected Children: Research, Practice and Policy. London: Sage, pp. 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dorota Iwaniec 2003

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations