Skip to main content

‘I’ll Want My Will Else’: The Changeling and Women’s Complicity with their Rapists

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: New Casebooks ((NECA))

Abstract

Sixteenth- and seventeenth-century English dramatists linked women’s sexual continence and their submission to the authority of their fathers and husbands not only to the well-ordering of family life, but to the preservation of social order.1 The ideal woman could be relied upon absolutely to protect these boundaries, and the age did have a model of such feminine purity, however unrealistic she must have seemed. Lucrece, wife of Collatine, victim of Tarquin’s lustful covetousness, was the English Renaissance’s archetypal pattern of the violated, yet virtuous woman. Her rape, available in Ovid and Livy (and in translations of their works), was versified by Shakespeare and Middleton, dramatised by Heywood, and echoed in plays throughout the Elizabethan and Jacobean periods, including Titus Andronicus, Valentinian, and Appius and Virginia.2 Lucrece was the model wife who took her own life rather than allow any doubt that her loyalty and her children belonged solely to her husband.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Middleton’s poem, ‘The Ghost of Lucrece’, was published in 1600. There were actually two dramatisations of Appius and Virginia. The first was an early Elizabethan interlude, the second is tentatively credited to John Webster and Thomas Heywood. See Leonard Tennenhouse, Power on Display: the Politics of Shakespeare’s Genres (New York, 1986), p. 111;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee Bliss, The World’s Perspective: John Webster and the Jacobean Drama (New Brunswick, NJ, 1983), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See James Sharpe, ‘The People and the Law’, in Barry Reay (ed.), Popular Culture in Seventeenth Century England (New York, 1985). Sharpe discusses popular enthusiasm for litigation in the Jacobean period and the tendency of British subjects to define their legal rights in terms of property holding and in contrast to the prerogative rights asserted by the Stuart monarchs. […]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Penelope Corfield discusses the economic pressures of the early seventeenth century in her essay, ‘Economic Issues and Ideologies’, in Conrad Russell (ed.), The Origins of the English Civil War (New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Perez Zagorin sketches out the influence of these pressures on the English social hierarchy in his preliminary chapter on ‘Social Structure and the Court and the Country’ in The Court and the Country: The Beginning of the English Revolution (London, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Perez Zagorin ‘Wealth, Inheritance and the Spectre of Strong Women’ in Still Harping on Daughters (New York, 1983) Lisa Jardine addresses some of the demographic and economic factors which placed stress on English views of female heirs to substantial estates (pp. 68–98).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edward Coke, The Institutes of the Laws of England (London, 1644), cap. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kathryn Gravdal, Ravishing Maidens: Writing Rape in Medieval French Literature and Law (Philadelphia, 1991), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, for example, Jardine, Still Harping; Kathleen McLuskie, ‘The Act, the Role and the Actor’, New Theatre Quarterly, 10 (1987), 120–30;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Phyllis Rackin, ‘Androgyny, Mimesis and the Marriage of the Boy Heroine on the English Renaissance Stage’, PMLA, 102 (1987), 29–41;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jean E. Howard, ‘Crossdressing, the Theatre and Gender Struggle in Early Modern Europe’, Shakespeare Studies, 39 (1988), 418–40;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laura Levine, ‘Men in Women’s Clothing’, Criticism, 28 (1986), 121–43;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stephen Orgel’s ‘Nobody’s Perfect or Why Did the English Stage Take Boys for Women?’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 88 (1989), 7–29;

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. W. Binns’s ‘Women or transvestites on the Elizabethan stage?’, Sixteenth Century Journal, 5 (1974), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Stevie Simkin

Copyright information

© 2001 The Editor(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burks, D.G. (2001). ‘I’ll Want My Will Else’: The Changeling and Women’s Complicity with their Rapists. In: Simkin, S. (eds) Revenge Tragedy. New Casebooks. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21397-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics