Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Key Concepts ((KCS))

  • 89 Accesses

Abstract

Some organizations perform a scaled-down version of job evaluation in order to examine a few jobs; in some cases, an organization may only have a limited number of different jobs. In both cases, it may be desirable to simplify the process of job evaluation, and rather than using a standard point-factor methodology, the human resources department adopts what is known as a paired-comparison methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allender, H., ‘Self-Directed Work Teams: How Far is Too Far?’ Total Quality Management, September/October 1993, pp. 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, L., ‘Employee Communications on the Increase’, Involvement and Participation, November 1991, pp. 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R., The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in the American Corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. and Mohrman, S., ‘Quality Circles After the Fad’, Harvard Business Review, January-February 1985, pp. 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykodym, Nick, Simonetti, Jack L., Nielson, Warren R., and Welling, Barbara, ‘Employee Empowerment’, Empowerments in Organization, 2(3) (1994), pp. 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. and Waterman, H., In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-run Companies. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. and Brannick, M., ‘A Role and Expectancy Model of Participative Decisionmaking: A Replication and Theoretical Extension’, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 11(2) (1990), pp. 331–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P., A Theory of Coal-Setting and Task Performance. London: Prentice-Hall International (UK), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, Julie, ‘The Role of Beliefs about the Fairness of Wage Settlements in Wage Setting’, People Management, November 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, Steven E., Incomparable Worth: Pay Equity Meets the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hegewisch, Ariane, Gregory, Jeanne and Sales, Rosemary, Women, Work and Inequality: The Challenge of Equal Pay in a Deregulated Labour Market. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, J. E., McCalla, G. I., Collins, J. A., Kumar, V. S., Meagher, P. and Vassileva, J. I., ‘Supporting Peer Help and Collaboration in Distributed Workplace Environments’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, John P. and Heskett, James L., Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: Free Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael, The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soltani, Ebrahim, Gennard, John, Meer, Robert van der and Williams, Terry, Content Issues of HR-Related Performance Measurement: A Total Quality Management Approach. University of Strathclyde Report, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Duncan and Armstrong, Michael, Paying for Contribution: New Performance-related Pay Strategies. London: Kogan Page, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chingos, Peter T., Paying for Performance: A Guide to Compensation Management. Chichester: John Wiley, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, Gregory L. (ed.), Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Jim, Test Yourself: Test your Aptitude, Personality and Motivation and Plan your Career. London: Kogan Page, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Tom and Waterman, Robert H., In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-running Companies. Profile Business, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, Willa M., Problem Employee Management: Proactive Strategies for Human Resource Managers. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marczely, B., ‘Staff Development for a Healthy Self-concept’, Journal of Staff Development, 11(1) (1990), pp. 40–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, D. and Loucks-Horsley, S., ‘Five Models of Staff Development for Teachers’, Journal of Staff Development, 10(4) (1989), pp. 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Jonathan Sutherland and Diane Canwell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sutherland, J., Canwell, D. (2004). Pp. In: Key Concepts in Human Resource Management. Palgrave Key Concepts. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20464-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics