Skip to main content

‘Heroines of Domestic Life’: Women’s History and Female Biography

  • Chapter
Writing Women’s History since the Renaissance
  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

By the mid-nineteenth century there were so many women engaged in historical writing they were becoming the subject of hostile reviews bemoaning their abundance.1 J. M. Kemble wrote in Fraser’s Magazine in 1885: ‘we [men] must plead to a great dislike for the growing tendency among women to become writers of history’.2 Underpinning this hostility was concern that women were ‘feminising’ history, at a time when it was reasserting its manliness through professionalisation. In spite of criticism, women engaged enthusiastically with historical writing throughout the nineteenth century, although the types of history women wrote were somewhat constrained by gender prescriptions stressing women’s essential domesticity.

Although history is one of the most useful studies which a woman can pursue, her powers of mind are hardly fitted to enter this field for the sake of instructing others …. And this point we strenuously maintain, that it is not that woman is, in ordinary cases, deficient in judgment, and she is carried away by their power. She feels keenly, and then decides promptly, instead of calmly weighing facts and deciding upon evidence. The very reasons which make the study of history beneficial to her, are the reasons dissuasive from her ever attempting to be an historian.

M. A. Stodart, Female Writers: Thoughts on their Proper Sphere and on their Powers of Usefulness, 1843

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Rohan Maitzen, ‘“This Feminine Preserve”: Historical Biographies by Victorian Women’, Victorian Studies, 38, 3 (1995): 371–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Natalie Zemon Davis, ‘“Women’s History” in Transition: The European Case’, Feminist Studies, 3, 3 /4 (1975): 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donna Dickenson, Margaret Fuller: A Woman’s Life (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1993), p. xvi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph W. Reed, English Biography in the Early Nineteenth Century 1810–1838 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alison Booth, ‘The Lessons of the Medusa: Anna Jameson and Collective Biographies of Women’, Victorian Studies, 42, 2 (1999): 260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony Fletcher, Gender, Sex and Subordination in England 15001800 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995), pp. 384.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitzi Myers, ‘Ruin or Reform: A Revolution in Female Manners’, Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture, 11 (1982): 200.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elizabeth Kowaleski-Wallace, Their Fathers’ Daughters: Hannah More, Maria Edgeworth, and Patriarchal Complicity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nancy Armstrong, Fiction: A Political History of the Novel (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barbara Miller Solomon, In The Company of Educated Women: A History of Women and Higher Education in America (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hannah More, Coelebs in Search of a Wife (Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1995), p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Veronica Webb Leahy, ‘Women Who Have Dared but Deterred Other Women: Hannah More and Beverly LaHaye’, in Ann C. Hall (ed.), Delights, Desires and Dilemmas: Essays on Women in the Media (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998), pp. 137–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hannah More, Hints towards forming the character of a young princess (London: T. Cadell & Davies, 1805), p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alison Plowden, Caroline & Charlotte, The Regent’s Wife and Daughter 1795–1821 (London: Sidgwick & Plowden, 1989), p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Katherine M. Rogers, ‘The Contribution of Mary Hays’,Prose Studies, 10, 2 (1987): 132.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mary Hays, Letters and Essays, Moral and Miscellaneous (London: T. Knott, 1793), p. iii.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elizabeth Hamilton, Memoirs of Agrippina, Wife of Germanicus (London: G. & J. Robinson, 1804), pp. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jane Rendall, ‘Writing History for British Women: Elizabeth Hamilton and the Memoirs of Agrippina’, in Clarissa Campbell Orr (ed.), Wollstonecraft’s Daughters: Womanhood in England and France 1780–1920 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996), p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mary Hays, Female Biography, or memoirs of illustrious and Celebrated Women of All Ages and Countries, Vol. 1 (R. Phillips: London, 1803), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jerry C. Beasley, ‘Politics and Moral Idealism: The Achievement of Some Early Women Novelists’, in Mary Anne Schofield and Cecilia Macheski (eds), Fetter’d or Free?: British Women Novelists 1670–1815 (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 1986), p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nancy Armstrong, Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. George L. Mosse, Nationalism and Sexuality: Respectability and Abnormal Sexuality in Modern Europe (New York: Howard Fertig, 1985), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robert A. Colby,’ “Rational Amusement”: Fiction vs. Useful Knowledge in the Nineteenth Century’, in James R. Kincaid and Albert J. Kuhn (eds), Victorian Literature and Society (Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 1984), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mrs John Sandford, Lives of English Female Worthies (London: Longman, 1833), p. x.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martha Vicinus, ‘Models for Public Life: Biographies of “Noble Women” for Girls’ in Claudia Nelson and Lynne Vallone (eds), The Girl’s Own: Cultural Histories of the Anglo-American Girl 1830–1915 (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1994), p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lucy Aitkin, ‘Memoir of Miss Benger’, in Elizabeth Ogilvy Benger, Anne Boleyn: Queen of Henry VIII (London: Longman, 1827), p. ix.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Deirdre David, Intellectual Women and Victorian Patriarchy (London: Macmillan, 1987), pp. vii-viii.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Hannah Adams, A Memoir of Hannah Adams (Boston: Gray & Bowen, 1832), pp. 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miriam Elizabeth Burstein,’ “The Reduced Pretensions of the Historic Muse”: Agnes Strickland and the Commerce of Women’s History’, Journal of Narrative Technique, 28 (1998): 220.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rosemary Mitchell, Picturing the Past: English History in Text and Image 1830–1870 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000), p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. A. Stodart, Female writers’ thoughts on their proper sphere, and on their powers of usefulness (London: Thames Ditton, 1842), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Anonymous, Select Female Biography, or Eminent British Ladies (London: John & Arthur Arch, 1821), p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Una Pope Hennessy, Agnes Strickland: Biographer of the Queens of England (London: Chatto & Windus, 1940), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cited in Mary Delorme, ‘“Facts, Not opinions”: Agnes Strickland’, History Today, 38 (1988): 47.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Alison Booth, ‘Illustrious Company: Victoria among other Women in Anglo-American Role Model Anthologies’, in Margaret Homans and Adrienne Munich (eds), Remaking Queen Victoria (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 72–7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. In Britain one of the first ‘patriotic’ or nationalist collections was published in the revolutionary year of 1848. See Elizabeth Starling’s Noble Deeds of Woman (London: Bohn, 1848).

    Google Scholar 

  37. An American supplement appeared several years later. See Jesse Clement’s Noble Deeds of American Women (Buffalo: Derby, 1851).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jeanne Moskal, ‘Gender, Nationality, and Textual Authority in Lady Morgan’s Travel Books’, in Paula R. Feldman and Theresa M. Kelley (eds), Romantic Women Writers: Voices and Countervoices (Hanover: University of New England Press, 1995), p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Katie Trumpener, Bardic Nationalism: The Romantic Novel and the British Empire (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997), p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ina Ferris, ‘Narrating Cultural Encounter: Lady Morgan and the Irish National Tale’, Nineteenth Century Literature, 51, 3 (1996): 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. See, for instance, Conrad, Perish the Thought, pp. 93–133; and Scott E. Caspar, ‘An Uneasy Marriage of Sentiment and Scholarship: Elizabeth F. Ellet and the Domestic Origins of American History’, Journal of Women’s History, 4 (1992): 10–35;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nina Baym, ‘Onward Christian Women: Sarah J. Hale’s History of the World’, New England Quarterly., 63, 2 (1990): 249–70;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nicole Tonkovich, Domesticity with a Difference: The Nonaction of Catherine Beecher, Sarah J. Hale, Fanny Fern and Margaret Fuller (Jackson: University of Mississippi Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Elizabeth Ellet, Women of the American Revolution, Vol. 1 (New York: Charles Scribner, 1852), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 Mary Spongberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spongberg, M. (2002). ‘Heroines of Domestic Life’: Women’s History and Female Biography. In: Writing Women’s History since the Renaissance. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20307-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics