Skip to main content

Estratto

Le arterie coronarie sono convenzionalmente divise in 15 segmenti principali (+1 la cui presenza è variabile) secondo la classificazione dell’American Heart Association (AHA). [1]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51(4 Suppl):5–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kardos A, Babai L, Rudas L et al (1997) Epidemiology of congenital coronary artery anomalies: a coronary arteriography study on a central european population. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 42:270–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamanaka O, Hobbs RE (1990) Coronary artery anomalies in 126,595 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 21:28–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liberthson RR, Dinsmore R, Bharati S et al (1974) Aberrant coronary artery origin from the aorta: Diagnosis and clinical significance. Circulation 50:774–779

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maron BJ, Thompson PD, Puffer JC et al (1996) Cardiovascular prepartecipation screening of competitive athletes: a statement for health professionals from Sudden Death Committee (Clinical Cardiology) and Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee (Cardiovascular Disease in the Young), American Heart Association. Circulation 94:850–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Serota H, Barth III CW, Seuc CA et al (1990) Rapid identification of the course of anomalous coronary arteries in adults: the “dot and eye” method. Am J Cardiol 65:891–898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Post JC, van Rossum AC, Bronzwaer JG et al (1995) Magnetic resonance angiography of anomalous coronary arteries. A new goldstandard for delineating the proximal course? Circulation 92:3163–3171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vliegen HW, Doornbos J, de Roos A et al (1997) Value of fast gradient echo magnetic resonance angiography as an adjunct to coronary arteriography in detecting and confirming the course of clinically significant coronary artery anomalies. Am J Cardiol 79:773–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bunce NH, Lorenz CH, Keegan J et al (2003) Coronary artery anomalies: assessment with free-breathing three-dimensional coronary MR angiography. Radiology 227:201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmid M, Achenbach S, Ludwig J et al (2005) Visualization of coronary artery anomalies by contrast-enhanced multi-detector row spiral computed tomography. Int J Cardiol; [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  11. National vital statistics report (2004) October; 53(5)

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ross R (1993) The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature 362:801–809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Topol EJ, Nissen SE (1995) Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. Circulation 92:2333–2342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sones Jr FM, Shirey EK (1962) Cine coronary arteriography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 31:735–738

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Papaconstantinou HD, Marshall AJ, Burrell CJ (1999) Diagnostic cardiac catheterisation in a hospital without on-site cardiac surgery. Heart 81:465–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Morgan-Hughes G, Marshall A, Roobottom C (2003) Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography: Experience in a UK centre. Clin Radiol 58:378–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kopp A, Kıttner A, Heuschmid M et al (2002) Multidetector-row CT cardiac imaging with 4 and 16 slices for coronary CTA and imaging of atherosclerotic plaques. Eur Radiol 12:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast sub-millimetre multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenosis with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D’Eliseo A et al (2004) Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 25:1043–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al (2004) Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:2265–2270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al (2005) Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Heart 91:938–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK et al (2005) Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 × 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J 26:1978–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE et al (2005) Highly accurate coronary angiography with submillimetre 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 91:308–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S et al (2004) Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1230–1237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnosic accuracy of non-invasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood CR et al (1979) Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 91:350–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Grodin CM, Dyrda I, Pasternac A et al (1974) Discrepancies between cineangiographic and post-mortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization. Circulation 49:703–709

    Google Scholar 

  30. Blankenhorn DH, Curry PJ (1982) The accuracy of arteriography and ultrasound imaging for atherosclerosis measurement: a review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 106:483–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vlaodaver Z, French R, van Tassel RA et al (1973) Correlation of the antemortem coronary angiogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 47:162–168

    Google Scholar 

  32. Moselewski F, Ropers D, Pohle K et al (2004) Comparison of measurement of cross-sectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 94:1294–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E et al (2003) From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation 108:1664–1672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rioufol G, Finet G, Ginon I et al (2002) Multiple atherosclerotic plaque rupture in acute coronary sindrome: a three-vessel intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 106:804–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hangartner JR, Charleston AJ, Davies MJ et al (1986) Morphological characteristics of clinically significant coronary artery stenosis in stable angina. Br Heart J 56:501–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Falk E (1989) Morphologic features of unstable atherothrombotic plaques underlying acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 63(suppl):114E–120E

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Varnava AM, Mills PG, Davies MJ (2002) Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque vulnerability. Circulation 105:939–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nissen SE (2002) Application of intravascular ultrasound to characterize coronary artery disease and assess the progression or regression of atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 89:24–31B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Birgelen C, Klinkhart W, Mintz GS et al (2001) Plaque distribution and vascular remodeling of ruptured and nonruptured coronary plaques in the same vessel: An intravascular ultrasound study in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1864–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U et al (2004) Assessment of coronary remodelling in stenotic e nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:842–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A et al (2001) Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1430–1435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A et al (2004) Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1241–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al (2004) Detection of calcified e noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimiter multidetector spiral computed tomography. Circulation 109:14–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Esposito, A., De Cobelli, F., Del Maschio, A. (2006). Lo studio delle coronarie native. In: La TC multidetettore nella diagnostica cardiovascolare. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0516-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0516-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0509-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0516-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics