Advertisement

Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis vs. Ileo-Anal Pouch as the Surgical Treatment for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

  • Omer Aziz
  • Paris Tekkis

Keywords

Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Weighted Mean Difference Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis Restorative Proctocolectomy Female Sexual Dysfunction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W et al (1991) Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Cell 66:589–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambrose WL Jr, Dozois RR, Pemberton JH et al (1992) Familial adenomatous polyposis: results following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 35:12–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jagelman DG (1991) Ileorectal anastomosis: familial adenomatous polyposis. Hepatogastroenterology 38:535–537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Cosse JJ, Bulow S, Neale K et al (1991) Rectal cancer risk in patients treated for familial adenomatous polyposis: The Leeds Castle Polyposis Group. Br J Surg 79:1372–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heiskanen I, Jarvinen HJ (1997) Fate of the rectal stump after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:9–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tekkis PP, Heriot A, Gallagher M et al (2005) Phenotypic factors can predict the risk of proctectomy after total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): a multifactorial model. Dis Colon Rectum 48:613Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nugent KP, Phillips RKS (1991) Rectal cancer risk in older patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and an ileorectal anastomosis: a cause for concern. Br J Surg 79:1204–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bertario L, Russo A, Radice P et al (2000) Genotype and phenotype factors as determinants for rectal stump cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: Hereditary Colorectal Tumors Registry. Ann Surg 231:538–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu JS, Paul P, McGannon EA, Church JM (1998) APC genotype, polyp number, and surgical options in familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 227:57–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Debinski HS, Love S, Spigelman AD, Phillips RKS (1996) Colorectal polyp counts and cancer risk in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastroenterology 110:1028–1030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slors JF, den Hartog Jager FC, Trum JW et al (1989) Long-term follow-up after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis coli. Is there still a place for the procedure? Hepatogastroenterology 36:109–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gingold BS, Jagelman DG (1989) Sparing the rectum in familial polyposis: causes for failure. Surgery 89:314–318Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR et al (1995) Surgery for the teenager with familial adenomatous polyposis: ileo-rectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy? Int J Colorectal Dis 10:6–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tonelli F, Valanzano R, Monaci I et al (1997) Restorative proctocolectomy or rectum-preserving surgery in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: results of a prospective study. World J Surg 21:653–658, discussion 659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Church J, Burke C, McGannon E et al (2003) Risk of rectal cancer in patients after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: a function of available surgical options. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1175–1181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shepherd NA, Jass JR, Duval I et al (1987) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: pathological and histochemical study of mucosal biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol 40:601–607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Slors JF, Ponson AE, Taat CW, Bosma A (1995) Risk of residual rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal reconstruction with the double-stapling technique. Postoperative endoscopic follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:207–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoehner JC, Metcalf AM (1994) Development of invasive adenocarcinoma following colectomy with ileoanal anastomosis for familial polyposis coli. Dis Colon Rectum 37:824–828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Remzi FH, Church JM, Bast J et al (2001) Mucosectomy vs. stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: functional outcome and neoplasia control. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1590–1596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soravia C, Klein L, Berk T et al (1999) Comparison of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1028–1033, discussion 1033–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pemberton JH, Kelly KA, Beart RW Jr et al (1987) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: long-term results. Ann Surg 206:504–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio V et al (1991) Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg 161:90–95, discussion 95–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Welling DR et al (1989) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: comparison of results in familial adenomatous polyposis and chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 210:268–271, discussion 272–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soravia C, O’Connor BI, Berk T et al (1999) Functional outcome of conversion of ileorectal anastomosis to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 42:903–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kartheuser AH, Parc R, Penna CP et al (1996) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the first choice operation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a ten-year experience. Surgery 119:615–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Milsom JW et al (1993) Omission of temporary diversion in restorative proctocolectomy: Is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum 36:1007–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Galandiuk S, Wolff BG, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr (1991) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 34:870–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Everett WG, Pollard SG (1990) Restorative proctocolectomy without temporary ileostomy. Br J Surg 77:621–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Penna C, Kartheuser A, Parc R et al (1993) Secondary proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 80:1621–1623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zenilman ME, Soper NJ, Dunnegan D, Becker JM (1990) Previous abdominal colectomy affects functional results after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg 14:594–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bjork J, Akerbrant H, Iselius L et al (2001) Outcome of primary and secondary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:984–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Clark SK, Phillips RK (1996) Desmoids in familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 83:1494–1504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Penna C, Tiret E, Parc R et al (1993) Operation and abdominal desmoid tumors in familial adenomatous polyposis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177:263–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jones IT, Jagelman DG, Fazio VW et al (1986) Desmoid tumors in familial polyposis coli. Ann Surg 204:94–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Madden MV, Neale KF, Nicholls RJ et al (1991) Comparison of morbidity and function after colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 78:789–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van Duijvendijk P, Slors JF, Taat CW et al (2000) Quality of life after total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 87:590–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gunther K, Braunrieder G, Bittorf BR et al (2003) Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis experience better bowel function and quality of life after ileorectal anastomosis than after ileoanal pouch. Colorectal Dis 5:38–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    The Cochrane Collaboration (2001) Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.1.3. Uk:Update Software, 2001, The Chochrane Library, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S et al (2000) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Onkologie 23:597–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ko CY, Rusin LC, Schoetz DJ Jr et al (2000) Does better functional result equate with better quality of life? Implications for surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 43:829–835, discussion 835–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rodriguez SanJuan JC, Casanova Rituerto D, Martino Fernandez E et al (1992) Familial adenomatous polyposis: proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch versus rectal preservation (in Spanish). Rev Esp Enferm Dig 82:159–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rotondano G, Esposito P, Novi A et al (1997) Surgery for familial polyposis of the colon: a functional followup (in Spanish). Minerva Chir 52:1163–1167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Van Duijvendijk P, Slors JF, Taat CW et al (1999) Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 230:648–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Malafosse M (2003) Familial adenomatous polyposis: long term follow-up of patients after surgical treatment. Prognostic factors (in French). Bull Acad Natl Med 187:103–114, discussion 114–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vasen HF, van Duijvendijk P, Buskens E et al (2001) Decision analysis in the surgical treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a Dutch-Scandinavian collaborative study including 659 patients. Gut 49:231–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bruwer M, Stern J, Schmidt-Gayk H et al (1998) Effect of proctocolectomy on fluid balance: comparison of conventional ileostomy, ileorectal anastomosis and ileoanal pouch operation (in German). Z Gastroenterol 36:201–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Penna CP, Tiret E, Kartheuser AH et al (1992) Comparison of functional results of ileorectal and ileo-anal anastomoses in familial adenomatous polyposis: conversions of ileorectal anastomoses into ileo-anal anastomoses (in French). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 16:401–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Spagnesi MT, Tonelli F, Dolara P et al (1994) Rectal proliferation and polyp occurrence in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after sulindac treatment. Gastroenterology 106:362–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Steinbach G, Lynch PM, Phillips RK et al (2000) The effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med 342:1946–1952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vasen HF, van der Luijt RB, Slors JF et al (1996) Molecular genetic tests as a guide to surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis. Lancet 348:433–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omer Aziz
    • 1
  • Paris Tekkis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology Imperial College LondonSt. Mary’s HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations